GOP takes page from Dems' playbook

Published:

Updated:

denver and the west

Colorado GOP takes page from Dems' playbook on soft money

Jessica Fender
The Denver Post
04/27/2010 01:00:00 AM MDT    

Republican operatives have started duplicating the political fundraising and organizational structure that catapulted state Democrats to power in 2004 and has helped keep them there since.

A PowerPoint presentation obtained by The Denver Post details the formation for Republicans of an outside-the- party umbrella organization called Common Sense Colorado, which hopes to direct $10 million to loosely affiliated conservative political groups.

A network of at least a half-dozen entities has taken shape in the past 16 months. And while there are no records with the secretary of state's office showing what they've raised so far, the presentation puts that total at $702,000 from a handful of corporate and industry donors, with prospects for $8.8 million.

The documents describe a "formal structure that controls all soft money efforts in Colorado" that's overseen by "political managers, business executives and attorneys to ensure full compliance."

But the lawyer who's helping establish the mass of nonprofit corporations and 527 political advocacy groups said the entities tied to Common Sense Colorado are just the tip of the conservative, soft-money iceberg.

"This is just one set of entities. This is 10 percent overall of what people are doing out there," said Jon Anderson, a lawyer with Holland and Hart and former chief legal counsel to Gov. Bill Owens. "There are a ton doing this sort of thing. There are so many entities out there that are being formed because of people's general dissatisfaction with government right now."

What works for Democrats . . .

The "Colorado Model" is widely credited as the source of the Democrats' recent success in the state and has been exported to liberal groups across the country.

Common Sense Colorado's presentation points out the control Republicans have lost since 2002: two U.S. Senate seats, two U.S. House seats, the governorship, the state treasurer's office, the secretary of state's office, and the state House and Senate.

Republicans were stunned in 2004 — a banner year for the GOP in the presidential election and elsewhere — when Colorado Democrats took back control of the state House and Senate for the first time in more than four decades.

Two years later, Democrat Bill Ritter reclaimed the governor's mansion for his party, giving the Democrats control of the governorship and both houses of the legislature for the first time in nearly half a century.

Then, just before the 2008 election, the liberals' model came to light, revealing a scheme where a high-powered board directed millions to a network of advocacy, get-out-the-vote, outreach and media groups. In 2006, the Democratic alliance marshaled at least $16 million to a web of 37 diffuse organizations, records show.

The organized effort with a decentralized structure allowed for control by key politicos without providing an obvious target for political opponents and their lawsuits.

It was completely new, said author and former Republican state Rep. Rob Witwer.

"It was a better political mousetrap, and it was perfectly allowed under the rules," said Witwer, who co-authored the book "The Blueprint: How the Democrats Won Colorado (and Why Republicans Everywhere Should Care)" with journalist Adam Schrager. "Now that the model is well-known, I think people are impressed with the simplicity and the innovation of the model."

"The poor voters"

Informed of the Common Sense Colorado model outlined in the presentation, Mark Grueskin, an attorney at Isaacson Rosenbaum PC who represents Democratic causes, said: "If this is their way to organize, so be it. There are still constraints, and they still have to operate within the law."

Republican political analyst Katy Atkinson said her side would be crazy not to borrow a page from the Democrats' playbook. She pointed out that with both sides funneling money through soft-money back channels, voters have a less clear view of who is influencing elections.

"You really feel for the poor voters. Every time they get a chance, they vote for campaign finance reform thinking they're going to get big money out of politics," Atkinson said. "They end up with more big money in politics — you just don't know where it is."

It's unclear who sits on the board of Common Sense Colorado. Anderson declined to give details.

The group's overall goal is $10 million, with half going to the gubernatorial race and $4 million headed to the statehouse races, according to the presentation.

Targeting legislature control

In Common Sense Colorado's crosshairs are six state House seats and four state Senate seats, enough to flip control in the chambers. And the biggest target in terms of proposed spending — a planned $800,000 — is sitting Senate Majority Leader John Morse, D-Colorado Springs.

The largest donor as of April 14 — the most recent date listed in the presentation — is the oil and gas industry, weighing in at $500,000. The industry is targeted for $5 million of the group's fundraising prospects.

Since January 2009, Anderson has established a series of mostly c4 nonprofit corporations, named after their tax-exempt status with the Internal Revenue Service. Four of the six have formed since December. In at least two cases, the entities' objectives appear to align with oil and gas interests.

Nonprofit corporations The Centennial Project and Colorado First both have as their goals "promoting public policy that strengthens affordable and reliable energy sources," according to secretary of state files. Other entities seek to "promot(e) public policy that strengthens strong business and a growing economy."

Entry #2,189

Comments

Avatar Todd -
#1
The one thing I hope the Republicans never copy is the Democrat's lying about their true intentions and ideology during the campaign. I'M SO SICK AND TIRED of seeing Democrats running as "centrists" and "moderates" -- and then once they win, morphing back into their true forms of liberals and progressives. That's how the disastrous government health care and stimulous happened.

Don't get me wrong, all politicians lie. That comes with the territory. However, a little lie here or there, or a broken campaign promise here or there is one thing -- but completely misrepresenting your principles is a completely different animal. That is unforgiveable.
Avatar konane -
#2
Agree with Todd. My gut says this and future election cycles are going to be determined by independent voters whether it's TEA Party members or others with no affiliation. People are tired of chameleons.

Post a Comment

Please Log In

To use this feature you must be logged into your Lottery Post account.

Not a member yet?

If you don't yet have a Lottery Post account, it's simple and free to create one! Just tap the Register button and after a quick process you'll be part of our lottery community.

Register