Welcome Guest
( Log In | Register )
The time is now 10:54 am
You last visited December 18, 2017, 9:44 am
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)

"Despite plan, not a single fire boom on hand on Gulf Coast at time of oil spill

Published:

"Despite plan, not a single fire boom on hand on Gulf Coast at time of oil spill

By Ben Raines

May 03, 2010, 12:09PM

Source Al.com

"If U.S. officials had followed up on a 1994 response plan for a major Gulf oil spill, it is possible that the spill could have been kept under control and far from land.

The problem: The federal government did not have a single fire boom on hand.

View full size (AP Photo/U.S. Coast Guard, Petty Officer 1st Class Justin Sawyer)This April 28, 2010 image made from video released by the Deepwater Horizon Response Unified Command, shows an in situ burn in the Gulf of Mexico, in response to the oil spill after the explosion on the Deepwater Horizon. The "In-Situ Burn" plan produced by federal agencies in 1994 calls for responding to a major oil spill in the Gulf with the immediate use of fire booms.

But in order to conduct a successful test burn eight days after the Deepwater Horizon well began releasing massive amounts of oil into the Gulf, officials had to purchase one from a company in Illinois.

When federal officials called, Elastec/American Marine, shipped the only boom it had in stock, Jeff Bohleber, chief financial officer for Elastec, said today.

At federal officials' behest, the company began calling customers in other countries and asking if the U.S. government could borrow their fire booms for a few days, he said.

A single fire boom being towed by two boats can burn up to 1,800 barrels of oil an hour, Bohleber said. That translates to 75,000 gallons an hour, raising the possibility that the spill could have been contained at the accident scene 100 miles from shore.

"They said this was the tool of last resort. No, this is absolutely the asset of first use. Get in there and start burning oil before the spill gets out of hand," Bohleber said. "If they had six or seven of these systems in place when this happened and got out there and started burning, it would have significantly lessened the amount of oil that got loose."

In the days after the rig sank, U.S Coast Guard Rear Admiral Mary Landry said the government had all the assets it needed. She did not discuss why officials waited more than a week to conduct a test burn. (Watch video footage of the test burn.)

At the time, former National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration oil spill response coordinator Ron Gouguet -- who helped craft the 1994 plan -- told the Press-Register that officials had pre-approval for burning. "The whole reason the plan was created was so we could pull the trigger right away."

Gouguet speculated that burning could have captured 95 percent of the oil as it spilled from the well.

Bohleber said that his company was bringing several fire booms from South America, and he believed the National Response Center discovered that it had one in storage.

Each boom costs a few hundred thousand dollars, Bohleber said, declining to give a specific price.

Made of flame-retardant fabric, each boom has two pumps that push water through its 500-foot length. Two boats tow the U-shaped boom through an oil slick, gathering up about 75,000 gallons of oil at a time. That oil is dragged away from the larger spill, ignited and burns within an hour, he said.

The boom can be used as long as waves are below 3 feet, Bohleber said.

"Because of the complexity of the system and the obvious longer production time to build them, the emphasis is on obtaining and gathering the systems," he said.

Bohleber said his company has conducted numerous tests with the Coast Guard since 1993, and it is now training crews on the use of the boom so workers will be ready when they arrive.

"We're arranging for six to be shipped in. We keep running into delays. Hopefully, they will be here by Wednesday to be available for use on Thursday. Bear in mind, two days ago, we thought they would be here today."

http://blog.al.com/live/2010/05/fire_boom_oil_spill_raines.html

Entry #1,786

Comments

1.
sully16Comment by sully16 - May 3, 2010, 9:45 pm
Let's see what happens during hurrican season.
2.
MADDOG10Comment by MADDOG10 - May 3, 2010, 9:47 pm
Maybe they couldn't get the tele-prompter to say " Lets Go " instead of "we're slow Joe " Either way this was an accident waiting to happen. The pied piper's first responce was to say " BP " would be paying for the clean up. What he meant to say was we'll take care of this and you'll be paying for it....
3.
jarasanComment by jarasan - May 3, 2010, 9:50 pm
17 years isn't enough time for the Feds or for them to mandate it.   The one thing that they coulda' done that would have been "GOOD" they failed again. This whole episode highlights bureaucratic crap and failures of Clinton Bush and GANGSTAPUPPETOTUSPOS.
4.
konaneComment by konane - May 3, 2010, 10:25 pm
Thanks Sully! I don't even want to think about it. Wonder how environmentalists are going to view their 'green' president now?

I'm stupefied that our treasury has been so looted we didn't have what was needed where it could be implemented. Guess we're too busy minding everyone else's business to take care of our own.
5.
konaneComment by konane - May 3, 2010, 10:26 pm
Thanks Maddog! Puppets definitely need something to tell them what to say when. Too busy basking in the glow at the press dinner ......... to be bothered.
6.
konaneComment by konane - May 3, 2010, 10:30 pm
If Clinton didn't know both GW and Cheney did know the type equipment needed. If we ever once had a fire boom where is it now?

Lots of people 'asleep at the switch' on this one.

You're right .... EPIC FAIL.

You must be a Lottery Post member to post comments to a Blog.

Register for a FREE membership, or if you're already a member please Log In.