Welcome Guest
( Log In | Register )
The time is now 1:52 am
You last visited August 19, 2017, 1:16 am
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)

"Open-Borders DOJ vs. America


"Open-Borders DOJ vs. America
MICHELLE MALKIN |  Source Townhall.com 

"The Obama administration's lawsuit against Arizona, officially unveiled on Tuesday, is an affront to all law-abiding Americans. It is a threatening salvo aimed at all local, county or state governments that dare to take control of the immigration chaos in their own backyards. And it is being driven by open-borders extremists who have dedicated their political careers to subverting homeland security policies in the name of compassion and diversity.

The Justice Department's Civil Rights Division, headed by Assistant Attorney General Thomas E. Perez, took the lead in prepping the legal brief against Arizona. The son of immigrants from the Dominican Republic, Perez is a far-left lawyer and activist who worked for the late mass illegal alien amnesty champion Ted Kennedy and served in the Clinton administration DOJ. While holding down a key government position there in which he was entrusted to abide by the rule of law, Perez volunteered for CASA de Maryland -- a notorious illegal alien advocacy group funded through a combination of taxpayer-subsidized grants and radical liberal philanthropy, including billionaire George Soros' Open Society Institute (not to mention more than $1 million showered on the group by Venezuelan thug Hugo Chavez's regime-owned oil company, CITGO).

Perez rose from CASA de Maryland volunteer to president of the group's board of directors. Under the guise of enhancing the "multicultural" experience, he crusaded for an ever-expanding set of illegal alien benefits ranging from in-state tuition discounts for illegal alien students to driver's licenses. CASA de Maryland opposes enforcement of deportation orders, has protested post-9/11 coordination of local, state and national criminal databases, and produced a "know your rights" propaganda pamphlet for illegal aliens depicting federal immigration agents as armed bullies making babies cry.

In 2006, CASA de Maryland threatened to protest at the schools of children whose parents belonged to the pro-immigration enforcement group Minuteman Project -- and then headed into the Montgomery County, Md., public schools to recruit junior amnesty protesters who were offered school credits for traveling with CASA de Maryland to march on Washington.

As a former Maryland resident, I got to see Perez's militant friends and colleagues in action. I watched CASA de Maryland President Gustavo Torres (who met with President Obama last week) complain that motor vehicle administration officials have "absolutely no right to ask for people's Social Security number or immigration status to get a driver's license." I stood among CASA de Maryland grievance-mongers who shouted, "No license, no justice! No justice, no peace!" while playing the race card against naturalized Americans and legal immigrants who opposed the illegal alien welfare state.

Perez himself derided secure-borders citizen activists as "xenophobes," but denied painting the grassroots immigration enforcement movement as racist. Questioned by GOP Sen. Jeff Sessions during his Obama DOJ confirmation hearing last year about the illegal alien rights guide produced by CASA de Maryland, Perez grudgingly stated that "the Civil Rights Division must not act in contravention to valid enforcement actions of our federal immigration laws." But "act(ing) in contravention" is exactly what the Civil Rights Division is doing in spearheading the challenge to Arizona's valid enforcement actions of our federal immigration law.

Perez, Attorney General Eric Holder and the rest of the open-borders DOJ team have invoked a "preemption" doctrine based on the U.S. Constitution's supremacy clause to attack Arizona's anti-illegal immigration measure and oppose local and state enforcement of federal immigration laws. Never mind that the Arizona law was drafted scrupulously to comply with all federal statutes and the Constitution.

You gotta love Obama's fair-weather friends of the Constitution. When a state acts to do the job the feds won't do, Obama's legal eagles run to the Founding Fathers for protection. When, on the other hand, left-wing cities across the country pass illegal alien sanctuary policies that flagrantly defy national immigration laws and hamper cross-jurisdiction enforcement, the newfound federal preemption advocates are nowhere in sight."


Entry #2,006


sully16Comment by sully16 - July 7, 2010, 1:13 pm
TREASON. He needs to removed asap, This is beyond anything one could imagine. I never would have believed that I would live to see the day where our leaders would refuse to keep us safe.
The same government doing everything possible to hamper the worlds largest enviromental disaster cleanup.
The same government that is refusing to fund a space program, is now trying to fund the muslim countries so they can have a space program.
konaneComment by konane - July 7, 2010, 1:39 pm
Thanks Sully! Information was out there prior to the election but the sheeple did what they told by the boob tube and look where it's got us all. There are none so blind as those who refuse to see.
Rick GComment by Rick G - July 7, 2010, 3:00 pm
The DOJ has become nothing but the legal arm of the rotating WH crime syndicate. It is not a Dept. of Justice because it ignores most crimes, esp. the major ones. Can anyone tell me what "Justice" they have served in the last 10 years? [insert cricket cacophony here]

Very Orwellian how everything is getting turned upside-down. I wish he hadn't written '1984' (the instruction manual).
konaneComment by konane - July 7, 2010, 3:15 pm
Thanks Rick! I actually think they were a bit more effective under Bush but did let many things go by the wayside.

They must equate convoluted thinking to thinking outside the box as if seeing things from a higher cause or greater scope of viewing the situation. However, both you and I do lots of conceptual outside the box thinking and believe we agree on one thing that you have to have a box as a beginning point. They seem to have misplaced theirs.
Rick GComment by Rick G - July 7, 2010, 5:44 pm
The Bush Justice Dept. spent most of its time justifying torture and warrant-less wiretapping. Different players, same endgame.
Comment by GASMETERGUY - July 7, 2010, 5:55 pm
Rick, the "torture and warrant-less wiretapping" you mentioned was against those who would bring us harm. Obama is going after those who would keep us safe.

Different players, different enemies.
konaneComment by konane - July 7, 2010, 10:29 pm
Thanks Rick!   With the current regime laws are an ever changing landscape dependent upon the whim of the moment. Maybe I walked through a door saying 'Twilight Zone' and didn't realize it.

konaneComment by konane - July 7, 2010, 10:36 pm
Thanks Gasmeterguy! Yes I agree different players, different enemies. When it's intimated that if someone disagrees with the current regime then you might be put on a watch list ...... makes me uncomfortable. Free speech seems under assault as it was during Empress Hillary's reign of politically correct re-education.

What about all the rabid leftists who labeled Bush as all kinds of things during his term? It's doubtful they got on anyone's list.
sully16Comment by sully16 - July 7, 2010, 11:38 pm
I had to go tho work or I would have listed everything, thats got me irked.
emilygComment by emilyg - July 8, 2010, 12:06 am
Disgusting. Shame.
konaneComment by konane - July 8, 2010, 9:31 am
Thanks Sully! Likely TEA Party members have a list of the same grievances.
konaneComment by konane - July 8, 2010, 9:34 am
Thanks Em! Yes it is. We're old enough to have seen how it was years ago and compared to now it's two different worlds.

You must be a Lottery Post member to post comments to a Blog.

Register for a FREE membership, or if you're already a member please Log In.