Show me the video recordings of the Pentagon plane crashing

Published: September 11, 2010, 7:31 pm

At every debate I have with friends about the 9/11 coverups, I end my statements asking them to show me the video evidence of a 767 flying into the Pentagon. All I hear are crickets chirping.

1: Video camera confiscated form atop the Hilton looking at the Pentagon.

2: Video camera confiscated from a fixed location looking at the highway where the supposed plane flew over.

3: Video camera confiscated form a mom and pop store pointed at the Pentagon.

4: And the best of them all......The top of the line video cameras strategically placed all around the Pentagon. Those video cameras have to be state of the art, yet what is the public presented?.....4 fuzzy, lousy pictures that don't resemble anything close to a 767.

If there is nothing to hide, why not show the American people the recordings, and let independent experts analyze them to make sure they weren't tampered with, in case they phtoshopped a plane in it.

Wouldn't you think the deceivers would like to once in for all shut all those conspiracy nuts up, by presenting the evidence?

Show me the videos, and If it shows a plane going into the Pentagon, and it's been verified by independent and reliable sources that the recordings weren't doctored, then I'll shut the heck up.

Even If I did see a plane going into the Pentagon, Id still have my reservations as to whether it was a deliberate act by devious entities, only because of the plethora of questions that still remain unanswered in other areas concerning the general events of that day, But at least I would be somewhat satisfied to see the videos. We all know that will never happen. And that to me is all I need to know to prove to myself that it was staged.

Entry #309

Comments

Rick G - Sep 11, 2010, 8:53 pm

It's the withholding of information that has plagued the investigation from the start. If the confiscated videos showed that an airplane struck the Pentagon then all those videos would have been available on 9/11. How many hundreds of times did they replay the WTC plane strikes that day? Why not the Pentagon attack as well?

In order for a 767 to impact only 10 ft. above ground level, the engines would have gouged and torn up the lawn. Lawn was unmarked. I'll go with what Rumsfeld let slip...a missile hit the pentagon. Aimed right at the accounting office that was investigating the $2.3 Trillion that Rumsfeld had described to Congress as "mis-placed" on Sept. 10th.

joker17 - Sep 11, 2010, 9:33 pm

Wow Rick, you're blowing my mind...ha ha ha.....I thought I read a lot material but you've defintely done your homework. Never knew about the 2.3 trillion routine. I'm also glad you brought up the coverage of the twin tower and how the Pentagon didn't even have one short length video. That was what I was thinking to add to the points I was making, but I got distracted by something. Great Point!

And one of the core engine part they found was not nearly the size of a 767's core. It was more like a smaller single engine.......like maybe a drone? The pics they provide looks more like a very sleek craft, rather than a large 767, 6 stories high at the top of the tail fin. Not to mention the many pilots who were veterans, clearly point out that the maneuvers the pilot would've taken to make their target is not only unrealistic, but next to impossible, especially at those high speeds.ed

I've seen computer animated simulations of the exact flight path the supposed jet took, and the last minute maneuvers do look hard to accomplish. Other evidence points to the shape of the hole, like a tunnel was carved in the building and showed certain columns weren't affected deeper within, which also confirms the 3-dimensional shape of the object to a reasonable degree. More like a torpedo with wings.......OH......ain't that a drone?

Show me the video recordings of the Pentagon plane crashing

Comments

Post a Comment

Please Log In

Not a member yet?