Love the Duffster. His idea to make ground zero the execution site for the perps is the best idea yet. As he said it takes a minimum of weeks to plant the charges for proper demolition. When Silverstein said they decided to 'pull it', no one asked the obvious question, why was Bldg. 7 already prepared for demolition?

Saw a video at whatreallyhappened.com of John Kerry confronted by 9/11truth and he admitted that bldg. 7 was a controlled demolition.

Rumsfeld slipped up at one time and said a missile hit the pentagon.

Bush said they used explosives in WTC 1 & 2 in this 35 sec. video clip ( http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hC6b6oQIyuw&feature=player_embedded) where he is defending the use of torture to get information from Gitmo detainees. NIST still claims to this day that explosives were not used despite the hundreds of eyewitnesses and video capturing the sights and sounds of explosions. There is no political advantage for NIST to lie. So why are they lying and who are they protecting?

The controlled demolitions is where they made their greatest mistake.

Thanks for the post TigerAngel!

I believe it was the late Christopher Story who wrote that 30,000 people not 3,000 perished in that attack. I'm not sure if Story's writing has been 'sanitized' since his death so am working with memory which may be faulty as far as specific source.

Yes, konane, he did report that. If the 3000 number is accurate, then there were many fortunate people that morning who managed to evacuate. The number is probably accurate because all missing persons reports that day would have been cross-checked with the possibility of being a WTC victim.