Welcome Guest
( Log In | Register )
The time is now 9:33 pm
You last visited January 16, 2017, 7:47 pm
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)

More explosions than most of us heard about

Published:

Lots of "extra" places listed.

So what "plane" hit Capitol Hill, etc.?

Entry #439

Comments

1.
Rick GComment by Rick G - October 18, 2010, 8:12 am
There are so many eyewitness accounts and videos of explosions preceding the collapses that it boggles the mind that NIST could not find any evidence of it. That's why NIST should be the first to be brought up on charges. The "pancake theory" has been totally debunked.                        

An interesting tidbit...the govt paid $50 million to investigate Clinton's WH sexcapades but only $600,000 to investigate 9/11.
2.
ToddComment by Todd - October 18, 2010, 9:30 am
Oy. All these conspiracy theories have been debunked long ago.

@Rick G: The Clinton investigation cost so much because in that case there was Bill Clinton and his political machine fighting the government in court, which I'm sure you're aware is very expensive. If he did not fight the investigation, it would not have cost so much. The dead terrorists could not fight the government, resulting in much lower costs. However, that being said, I rather doubt that the entire 9/11 investigation cost a mere $600,000. Maybe that's $600,000 per page of the book they published.
3.
time*treatComment by time*treat - October 18, 2010, 12:42 pm
Yeah, Rick, you know the gov't would *never* get their info wrong, or lie to us.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/1559151.stm
(note one of the 'dead terrorists' is a commercial airline pilot)
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/02/03/nyregion/03suit.html?_r=1
(air quality at ground zero is perfectly fine, it's only ever used for driving to church on Sundays -- you betcha)

You must be a Lottery Post member to post comments to a Blog.

Register for a FREE membership, or if you're already a member please Log In.