- Home
- Premium Memberships
- Lottery Results
- Forums
- Predictions
- Lottery Post Videos
- News
- Search Drawings
- Search Lottery Post
- Lottery Systems
- Lottery Charts
- Lottery Wheels
- Worldwide Jackpots
- Quick Picks
- On This Day in History
- Blogs
- Online Games
- Premium Features
- Contact Us
- Whitelist Lottery Post
- Rules
- Lottery Book Store
- Lottery Post Gift Shop
The time is now 12:13 am
You last visited
April 26, 2024, 12:13 am
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)
Mystical numbers versus 'luck' or statistics
Published:
Morning blogsters:
I'm sitting here waiting for sunup to crank up the jalopy and head off on a minor sabbatical for a few days. But waiting gets me musing, so I think I'll muse on screen.
When I came to LP almost a year ago I watched the threads a while, but I was here for a specific reason... the same reason anyone comes to LP. I wanted to find out how to win the lottery.
I posted a thread, https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/109482?q=Rip+Snorter explaining what circumstances led me to it.
I also submerged myself in every aspect of number behavior I could concieve of. I refused to disbelieve anything unless I saw for myself it wouldn't work.
I think I'm coming right along toward getting it figured out. The predictions pages seem to be holding fast, still getting enough hits on the predictions to keep me imaginary money ahead.
It's taken me a year of submersion in the numbers and trying crazy things to discover for a certainty that it can be done, knowing fairly well what numbers are going to hit on a given day. I believe you can do it, anyone can do it, and that most of you can do it a lot more easily than I did, because hopefully you are smarter than me.
The first step is in believing those numbers aren't random and that you are the person to figure out how they work. The second step is not believing almost anything anyone else pronounces about how numbers work. Including me.
If you keep an eye on the prediction statistics and see Rip Snorter begin to fade, it was all a fluke and everything I'm saying now is BS. But if there continue to be more imaginary dollar successes than failures it ought to serve as proof to you that some dumb old country boy in New Mexico figured out a way to understand enough about number behavior to beat the odds a bit.
If you want to try it you can follow my thought processes and the testing I've done, the things I've tried right through this blog..... they're all back there, crazy and unlikely, but maybe they'll help.
Or, if you see me going belly up on the prediction statistics, go back up to the mathmatics forum and lottery systems forum and hope for the best.
But my guess is if you want to figure out how numbers work you are going to need a Premium Membership. LP is good, but not good enough unless you have the tools Todd provides to allow you to use LP as a launchpad.
Best to you, blogsters. Good luck.
Jack
Comments
Also sometimes those prediction cycles go between different games so if one type isn't working then go to another and try your hand at that one for perhaps a pleasant surprise.
Whatever game you're working on at the time, the very best of luck to you. Perhaps your getting away will be the breath of fresh air break that's needed to come back full force.
Thanks konane.
J
So far as I can discern in retrospect, the downside of LP lies in the certainties of so many good people who, in an effort to help others, are quick to pronounce what is and what is not 'true' based upon their own beliefs and experiences.
We all come here to learn, but that quickly changes and we (think we) are teachers.
If the numbers can't be predicted or understood the most efficient use of anyone's time is the QP. But, if a person believes there's a means of understanding or predicting number behavior there's only one measure of success in the veterans: prediction history and personal prediction statistics based on wager amounts/win-losses. The bottom line.
If a person predicting has a negative total in the summation, if the wager amounts are larger than the wins, he/she has no business giving advice to anyone about how numbers behave. Maybe, neither does anyone else, but certainly not people who have a history of losing more than they've bet in their predictions.
But of course, they do and they will because they've come to see themselves as 'experts', despite the fact they should be on the learning side of the equation.
We're blessed with enormous brains, we humans. The universe evidently provided us the egos to help us find ways to avoid using those enormous brains.
We aren't teachers. We're learners until there's someone around here who understands things well enough to put the profit/loss on the positive side and keep it there. Then the person who can do that needs to go find something else to learn.
J
Would sure be nice if there were!!!!!!
It sure would be nice if it did!!!
Post a Comment
Please Log In
To use this feature you must be logged into your Lottery Post account.
Not a member yet?
If you don't yet have a Lottery Post account, it's simple and free to create one! Just tap the Register button and after a quick process you'll be part of our lottery community.
Register