Casey Anthony Found Not Guilty*Shock

Published:

Updated:

I'm shocked that the jury found tot mom not guilty! The evidence was huge. Maybe they shouldn't have gone for the death penalty and that was the problem for the jury. So, if she didn't murder her 2 year old daughter then who did?

Post your thoughts here.

Entry #329

Comments

Avatar TigerAngel -
#1
Question? If your 2 year old daughter was missing, how long would you wait to call 911? 30 minutes? One hour? How about never? After 31 days it was the grandmother that called 911 and said her granddaughter has been missing for 31 days!
Avatar tiparker119 -
#2
TigerAngel.....Casey just won the LOTTERY today.....she will go on to write book, have movie made.....appear on every show and magazine...and never serve a day for the death of her 2 y/o baby that she killed...I would not be surprise is she and Baez run off into the sunset together to make millions off the death of the precious little girl...I agree with you, there was so much evidence and what was the jurors thinking..??? May CayLee Rest In Peace...!!!
Avatar Tenaj -
#3
That is our criminal justice system. The jury was not allowed all the information, like we did. I'm sure they would have found her guilty in some way connected to what happened to Kaylee.

Boy will the jury be shocked when they hear it now.    I was not shocked at the verdict after watching the circus in the courtroom that was suppose to be a trial. That's the way the system works.

But I am shocked that she was not charged with not reporting her child missing and lying about her whereabouts. Surely that is a crime.
Avatar time*treat -
#4
She has been charged (according to one news story I read) with lying about certain matters. Those carry separate penalties, to be decided later.
Avatar TigerAngel -
#5
She was found guilty only on the four counts of lying to the police. These are misdomeanors that could be sentenced one year in prison for each so 4 yrs. but, she will prolly go free (for time served)Thurs. morning at 9am when the judge will sentence her in court on live TV.
Avatar Tenaj -
#6
I was confused about why wasn't she charged with "not reporting a missing child" after they found out there was not a nanny. But now that I think about it I understand why she wasn't charged with that. The state went for Murder so her not reporting the child missing was just part of the evidence. wow
Avatar TigerAngel -
#7
Apparently this was not heard by the jury, I can't imagine why. The woman sent home with Casey when she got out on bail had this to report. Casey said, "Look at my tatoo, I got it in memory of Caylee". The baby's body had not been found yet but she was talking about her in the past tense!!
Avatar CashWinner$ -
#8
I was shocked too! I agree, the State of FL should not have gone for the death penalty. However, they way both sides were presented, I respect the jury's decision.
RIP Caylee Anthony...So sad.......
Avatar paradisenow -
#9
The jury should have Casey babysit their children..... the female OJ ..... lesson kill your child, lie and freedom ,,,,,RIP Caylee
Avatar CARBOB -
#10
You can not convict anyone, if the evidence does not connect them to the crime. Not one bit of evidence they presented connected her to the crime. The autopsy did not determine how the child died, big factor, in my opinon. Sad yes, but the jury must use the evidence presented. After watching one week of the trial, my friend and I agreed, there would not be a 1st degree conviction.
Avatar Tenaj -
#11
"Zanny" is slang for Zanax. Hence, "Zanny, the Nanny"
Avatar Rick G -
#12
The fact that there is so much disagreement on the decision is an indication that the prosecution did not make its case. Those who followed the trial via TV news think she should have been found guilty. Those who followed the actual trial daily think the jury came to the right decision.

There is no room for uncertainty when it comes to life imprisonment or death penalty. The blame lies squarely on the police investigators for not solving the crime and the state for rushing to prosecute the crime with a weak case. The jury did what it was supposed to do.

Comparing it to the OJ case, many thought he was guilty as well. However investigators did not focus on OJ's son Jason who was also a prime suspect. Some suspect that OJ took the fall to protect his son.

The problem investigators have is pre-judgment and tunnel vision. They tend to build a case around a suspect rather than the facts. In this case did they look as closely at George Anthony?

Avatar jarasan -
#13
It is so refreshing when the talking heads all are eating $h1t today. They convicted her before the trial was over.   They reap what they sow. How many people have been wrongfully convicted? A lot. This has been the biggest TV circus of circle jerk I have ever seen, disgusting and they should STFU. If she IS guilty then she'll get hers one way or another, you can book it.

Everyday just here in the US 4 to 5 kids "disappear" why aren't they all searching for them?????????????????? Get a life Geraldo and your cronies, pathetic miserable fake Puerto Rican Jerry Rivers POS. sensationalist punk just go away please!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Avatar TigerAngel -
#14
Thanx everyone for your comments.
Avatar addai1516 -
#15
Trust the justice sysytem casey . The media was against her they found her guilty b4 the jury presided .. If you had watch how the trial went you will not hate Casey Anthony. I was watching NBC dateline and i noticed that a lot of issues was not available to the public media . Many mishaps may convinse u that the her parents look more guilty than her ..   The jury did their job.. George Anthony seems like the murderer according to him he seen her body in the swimming pool and picked her up and it was accident. wow !!

Post a Comment

Please Log In

To use this feature you must be logged into your Lottery Post account.

Not a member yet?

If you don't yet have a Lottery Post account, it's simple and free to create one! Just tap the Register button and after a quick process you'll be part of our lottery community.

Register