Welcome Guest
( Log In | Register )
The time is now 8:56 pm
You last visited August 18, 2017, 7:49 pm
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)

U.S. Dist Judge: Sec 1021 of NDAA unconstitutional


Chris Hedges Defeats Imprisonment For Speech (NDAA SEC 1021)



A Victory for All of Us: by Chris Hedges

U.S. District Judge Katherine Forrest, in a 68-page opinion, ruled Wednesday [May 16, 2012] that Section 1021 of the NDAA was unconstitutional. It was a stunning and monumental victory. With her ruling she returned us to a country where—as it was before Obama signed this act into law Dec. 31—the government cannot strip a U.S. citizen of due process or use the military to arrest him or her and then hold him or her in military prison indefinitely. She categorically rejected the government’s claims that the plaintiffs did not have the standing to bring the case to trial because none of us had been indefinitely detained, that lack of imminent enforcement against us meant there was no need for an injunction and that the NDAA simply codified what had previously been set down in the 2001 Authorization to Use Military Force Act. The ruling was a huge victory for the protection of free speech. Judge Forrest struck down language in the law that she said gave the government the ability to incarcerate people based on what they said or wrote. Maybe the ruling won’t last. Maybe it will be overturned. But we and other Americans are freer today than we were a week ago. And there is something in this.

The government lawyers, despite being asked five times by the judge to guarantee that we plaintiffs would not be charged under the law for our activities, refused to give any assurances. They did not provide assurances because under the law there were none. We could, even they tacitly admitted, be subject to these coercive measures. We too could be swept away into a black hole. And this, I think, decided the case.


Entry #816


time*treatComment by time*treat - May 21, 2012, 9:41 am
Be sure to read the second half of the article. Twice.
Comment by GASMETERGUY - May 21, 2012, 8:35 pm
Our government has made several attempts to arrest dissenters. The first was the Alien and Seditions Act under John Adams. The second was during WWI under Woodrow Wilson. Several people served many years in jail for opposing America entering that war.

Now we have this attempt. What part of the First Amendment do our leaders not get?

You must be a Lottery Post member to post comments to a Blog.

Register for a FREE membership, or if you're already a member please Log In.