I do not even have to read the article to give an answer from my viewpoint.
UNIONS

The article was all typical leftwing-loon propaganda anyway, JAP. We all know the truth. Union thugs who want to live like royalty and want the other half of the state to pay for it, that's what's dividing the state. The half that are paying the tab are sick of it.
Walker will beat the recall handily and Romney will carry the state in November.
That's how mad the good, decent people in Wisconsin are.
The state has gone from blue to red because of union-thug greed and corruption.

Comment by rdgrnr - Today, 5:40 pmThe article was all typical leftwing-loon propaganda anyway
________________________________________
Glad I did not read it. Just finished a nice dinner and I really would not want to projectile vomit it up.
Thanks for the warning.

It's funny to hear the NY Times call Wisconsin "politically divisive". Because it is anything BUT politically divisive. It is clearly NOT divisive -- the public has clearly spoken (through their votes) that they do not want unions to destroy the economy, and despite the massive pressure being exerted by the unions, the people want to keep their new governor, who is diluting the power of the oppressive unions and putting more power in the hands of the people.

But to the NY Times, it is "divisive" because all of the sudden they are realizing what most of us realized a long time ago -- that their extreme liberal views of not in the mainstream of America. They are calling it "divisive", just as anyone who thinks they are smarter than everyone else tries to find somewhere else to place the blame -- other than themselves.