Yep,
Rag mags are pretty much on target with their articles. Seen many of them come to be.
Sometimes rag mags pull out the truth faster than internet sites.

The social security number was an issue from the very beginning. Why has it taken this long to go mainstream (and I use that term loosely with The Globe)?

Journalists in their ranks are overwhelmingly Democrats.
It is sheer torture for one of them to say a disparaging word about ANY fellow Democrat but ESPECIALLY Obama. TORTURE!
And they KNOW they will be ridiculed, ignored and ostracized by other news sources and their fellow Democrat reporters for letting something be known to the public that could in anyway be deleterious to their hero, the President.
But the byline in papers like the Globe is frequently something innocuous like "Globe Staff" or "Staff Reporter" or some phony nom de plume to protect anyone connected to the story from retribution from their liberal "friends."
That's why these stories are often broken by the tabloids.
And they HATE that. Heh,heh,heh,heh,heh...

Is that one of Murdoch's papers? Is that why he stepped down?

Just read CT's blog that is absolutely proof beyond a shadow of a doubt of the propaganda machine that has evolved over the years. It has been hammered by facts, truth, and the internet etc. and slowly but surely we will get back to being honest with each other, and getting back some of our freedoms we've lost.

Yes, I agree.

ABSOLUTELY...! Agreed....!