All of Ryans plans and ideas need to be debated and voted on in congress to go anywhere. Same goes for Romneys financial plans.
The same goes for Obamas ideas on financial reform.
We have congress involved here on these financial issues.

They're going for the "what do you two disagree on" angle, forgetting/ignoring that back in the old days, the person who became your V.P. was the one who got the second-highest number of votes for President (i.e., your nearest competitor).

Washington Post.
Those two words should bring to mind these two words - caveat emptor.
Everything they say is agenda driven.
They are in-the-tank.
It's all piffle.

Paul Ryan NEVER met a spending Bill since he has been in Congress since 1998 that he would not vote"YEA" on to help Republicans who controlled Congress and wrote those bills for 8 straight years from 1998-2006 to more than double the national debt and spend more tax payer money in just 8 years than all Presidents before George W. Bush combined in over 200+ years.

If that were true, you'd be voting for him, boobio.