The NY Times actually put this story out. A little behind the times on this one or are they using it as a lead story for some reason.
Preppin the masses with a national publication.

Maybe Barry's gonna start blaming the last 4 years on VJ now instead of Bush if she's been the one actually running the country while he's been out vacationing and golfing.
Maybe he's gonna come out saying he's got better ideas than hers for the next 4 years.
Yeah, that's the ticket!
"I tried it HER way and it didn't work!"
"Now I'm gonna do it MY way!"
"The NEW IMPROVED hopey-changey-thingy!"
"Yes we can!"
"I am the ONE I've been waiting for!"

He knew that " Hope and Change " thingy didn't work, so, they devised a new slogan " Forward ", And I'm hoping he'll be true to his words this time and go straight out the door...! >>>>   FORWARD...!

With respect, you guys are reading this wrong. It is intended as a positive article showing that Obama employs a strong-willed woman with ultimate leadership position within his administration.

Of course, the vast majority of normal people reading this will see what is plainly on the surface: that Obama lacks management skills and employs a bunch of half-witted, power-hungry imps.

But you guys are not the ones who the article is aimed toward. It is aimed toward younger, mainly single working women who generally lean left. This article actually makes them feel good about Obama, because he employs somebody they can identify with, and who makes them feel good about their own station (and immediate goals) in life.

The vast majority of voters have already made up their minds as to whom they are voting for. Articles you see published by the NY Times before election day will not be geared toward the masses, but instead toward individual niche categories of people who can be swayed, or whom must be cemented in place -- lest they go for Romney.

Wow! Todd schooling the dumb and ignorant of Lottery Post!
You go Todd!
I respect you more for telling more truth in the above post than the 3 you admonished have in ALL of theirs!
You da Man Todd!

That may be true, Todd, but in the dog-eat-dog world of Chicago politicians, (and given that my scenario was pure fantasy) I don't think he'd hesitate to throw her under the bus for one second if he found it politically expedient and Michelle allowed it.

And some women (maybe a lot) I've known, single and married, don't always fall into that group-think mold and may sometimes harbor just a little resentment for domineering women like VJ and the wicked witch of abortion, Sebellius.

But then too, my logic may be skewed by associating with mostly patriotic, conservative, freedom-loving women. My encounters with Democrat women were usually just physical, conducted in the throes of a drunken stupor and as brief as possible (I can't take all the yappin' and begging me not to leave afterwards).

But I see what you're saying.

Are your sheep "wimmins" Democrat Hillbilly Holler Dweller?