Welcome Guest
( Log In | Register )
The time is now 4:25 am
You last visited January 22, 2017, 4:15 am
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)

"Islamist Challenge to the U.S. Constitution


Blog entry quoted below links to a hugely worthwhile article about a creeping, well funded assault on our Constitution in an attempt to elevate Shari‘a law above both US Constitutional and individual state laws.  Hey it worked in Europe so why not here??

"The Islamist Challenge to the U.S. Constitution

"David Kennedy Houck reveals how serious the challenge to the U.S. Constitution by Muslim groups has already become. From the Middle East Quarterly, [ http://www.meforum.org/article/920 ]with thanks to DFS:

First in Europe and now in the United States, Muslim groups have petitioned to establish enclaves in which they can uphold and enforce greater compliance to Islamic law. While the U.S. Constitution enshrines the right to religious freedom and the prohibition against a state religion, when it comes to the rights of religious enclaves to impose communal rules, the dividing line is more nebulous. Can U.S. enclaves, homeowner associations, and other groups enforce Islamic law?

Such questions are no longer theoretical. While Muslim organizations first established enclaves in Europe,[1] the trend is now crossing the Atlantic. Some Islamist community leaders in the United States are challenging the principles of assimilation and equality once central to the civil rights movement, seeking instead to live according to a separate but equal philosophy. The Gwynnoaks Muslim Residential Development group, for example, has established an informal enclave in Baltimore because, according to John Yahya Cason, director of the Islamic Education and Community Development Initiative, a Baltimore-based Muslim advocacy group, "there was no community in the U.S. that showed the totality of the essential components of Muslim social, economic, and political structure."[2]

Baltimore is not alone. In August 2004, a local planning commission in Little Rock, Arkansas, granted The Islamic Center for Human Excellence authorization to build an internal Islamic enclave to include a mosque, a school, and twenty-two homes.[3] While the imam, Aquil Hamidullah, says his goal is to create "a clean community, free of alcohol, drugs, and free of gangs,"[4] the implications for U.S. jurisprudence of this and other internal enclaves are greater: while the Little Rock enclave might prevent the sale of alcohol, can it punish possession and in what manner? Can it force all women, be they residents or visitors, to don Islamic hijab (headscarf)? Such enclaves raise the fundamental questions of when, how, and to what extent religious practice may supersede the U.S. Constitution.

Don't fail to read it all.

Entry #233


Comment by shalini - April 2, 2006, 9:02 pm
konane, on another note..glad to see jill carrol heading home. and all the b.s. about her actually meaning what she said...you don't have to be a rocket scientist to figure that the poor woman said it under duress. prisoners on both sides are being mistreated. no one side is any better than the other on that accord....atleast the americans didn't decapitate their poor prisoners!
konaneComment by konane - April 2, 2006, 10:06 pm
Very happy to have you commenting again, Shalini!! Hope you and your family are all well!

Yes Jil Carroll was reciting pure BS to get out alive .... only gullible, stuck-on-stupid leftist would buy into her original statement.

You must be a Lottery Post member to post comments to a Blog.

Register for a FREE membership, or if you're already a member please Log In.