Welcome Guest
( Log In | Register )
The time is now 12:18 pm
You last visited January 24, 2017, 12:09 pm
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)

Rep. Issa: US Waged Possible 'Cover-Up' in Benghazi

Published:

Rep. Issa: US Waged Possible 'Cover-Up' in Benghazi

       
Image: Rep. Issa: US Waged Possible 'Cover-Up' in Benghazi 
     

            Sunday, 05 May 2013

            By Greg Richter

 
 
 
 
   
  •                  
  •            
  •        
  •    
   
                             Rep. Darrell Issa of California charged on Sunday that the  Obama administration made a political decision to deny that terrorists were  responsible for the Sept. 11, 2012 attack on the U.S. diplomatic mission in  Benghazi, Libya.
"We can't find a classified reason for it. We can't  find a diplomatic reason for it," said the Republican, appearing on CBS' "Face  the Nation."
Issa’s House Oversight and Government Reform Committee  will begin hearings on Wednesday to find out whether there was a cover-up by the  Obama administration of the attack that resulted in the death of U.S. Ambassador  Chris Stevens and three other Americans.

 Gregory  Hicks, who was second in command at the Benghazi mission, will testify along  with Mark Thompson, acting deputy assistant secretary for counterterrorism, and  Eric Nordstrom, diplomatic security officer and former regional security officer  in Libya.
"I thought is was a terrorist attack from the get-go," Hicks  was quoted as telling investigators. "I think everybody in the mission thought  it was a terrorist attack from the beginning."
But U.N. Ambassador Susan  Rice appeared on five Sunday morning news shows five days later blaming the  attack on a spontaneous protest that erupted after a similar protest in Egypt.  The Egyptian protest was blamed on an anti-Muslim video made in the United  States.
Prior to Rice’s appearance on "Face the Nation" at that time,  Libya's newly elected president Mohamed Magarief had just told host Bob  Schieffer that the attack was caused by terrorism.
For Rice to  immediately contradict him was a "loss of face" in his own country and  throughout the world, Hicks said. "The net impact of what has transpired is the  spokesperson of the most powerful country in the world has basically said that  the president of Libya is either a liar or doesn't know what he's talking  about.
"My jaw hit the floor as I watched this," Hicks told  investigators. "I've never been as embarrassed in my life, in my career, as on  that day. I never reported a demonstration; I reported an attack on the  consulate. Chris' last report — if you want to say his final report — is 'Greg,  we are under attack.'"
"You can't insult a foreign leader in a greater  way than happened literally here just those few days later," Issa told Schieffer  on Sunday.
That slap in the face caused Magarief to delay approval of a  request by the U.S. to put FBI investigators on the ground in Benghazi, Issa  said.
"If you tell him he's wrong, that it's not terrorism, what a  surprise that you have a hard time getting FBI to the crime scene," he said. "If  anything, we may have compromised our ability to know what really happened there  as far as catching the culprits, because more weeks went by with no FBI on the  ground."
Hicks said he was known by people in the State Department, yet  was never told Rice would appear on television and deny that an attack had taken  place. Had he known in advance, he could have told her she was wrong, he  said.
And Beth Jones, acting assistant secretary for near-eastern  affairs in the State Department didn't seem like she wanted to talk either,  Hicks recalled.
Issa called the episode a "fatal error" to the U.S.  relationship with Libya for at least a period of time. "And we can't find the  purpose."
Issa said that the reason for the possible cover-up is likely  because requests for additional security had been ignored by the State  Department. "But it does seem like it's bigger than that."
There was a  mentality, he said, that everyone had to pretend things were safe, that the war  on terror was over. That may have caused people to say it couldn't be called  terrorism, "because then the war on terror is back alive."
He said the  war on terror is very much alive, "whether it's Chechen nationals that come  here, or it's what's going on in Syria. It's al-Qaida around the world."
One of the issues Issa's committee will focus on is why talking points were  changed in the days after the attack.
State Department spokesperson  Victoria Nuland had expressed fear that the talking points would be used by  members of Congress to criticize the State Department for not paying attention  to agency warnings about the need for more security, according to Schieffer. 
"We know one thing," Issa responded. "The talking points were right,  and then the talking points were wrong."
Then-Secretary of State  Hillary Clinton should have been "on the same sheet of music with the Libyan  government," Issa said, "and she wasn't."
Hicks himself hasn't been  given access to the classified report, Issa said, so his assertions that the  report is wrong are based on the public report.
Issa called the State  Department's probe "questionable" in that it clearly meets the statutory  requirement to do an investigation, but "it doesn't answer any real questions,  or place blame on people who were involved in this failure."
He  described the effort by the Obama administration "a misinformation campaign at  best, and a cover-up at worst."

Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com  http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/RepIssa-Cover-Up-Benghazi/2013/05/05/id/502828?s=al&promo_code=13607-1#ixzz2ST2cHXEY Urgent: Should Obamacare Be Repealed? Vote Here Now!

Entry #528

Comments

This Blog entry currently has no comments.

You must be a Lottery Post member to post comments to a Blog.

Register for a FREE membership, or if you're already a member please Log In.