Welcome Guest
( Log In | Register )
The time is now 7:51 pm
You last visited May 22, 2017, 7:05 pm
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)

Two New Benghazi Whistleblowers Come Forward, Reveal Why Ambassador Stevens Was in Libya


Two New Benghazi Whistleblowers Come Forward, Reveal Why Ambassador Stevens Was in Libya



stevens-obama-clintonNews is breaking that could be devastating to both Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama. It seems that Ambassador Chris Stevens trip to Libya may have been a planned buyback of Stinger Missiles from Al Qaeda linked terrorists. These missiles were originally issued to these Al Qaeda groups by the State Department according to the whistleblowers. PJ Media is reporting:

More whistleblowers will emerge shortly in the escalating Benghazi scandal, according to two former U.S. diplomats who spoke with PJ Media Monday afternoon.

These whistleblowers, colleagues of the former diplomats, are currently securing legal counsel because they work in areas not fully protected by the Whistleblower law.

According to the diplomats, what these whistleblowers will say will be at least as explosive as what we have already learned about the scandal, including details about what really transpired in Benghazi that are potentially devastating to both Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton.

The former diplomats inform PJM the new revelations concentrate in two areas — what Ambassador Chris Stevens was actually doing in Benghazi and the pressure put on General Carter Ham, then in command of U.S. Africa Command (AFRICOM) and therefore responsible for Libya, not to act to protect jeopardized U.S. personnel.

Stevens’ mission in Benghazi, they will say, was to buy back Stinger missiles from al-Qaeda groups issued to them by the State Department, not by the CIA. Such a mission would usually be a CIA effort, but the intelligence agency had opposed the idea because of the high risk involved in arming “insurgents” with powerful weapons that endanger civilian aircraft.

Hillary Clinton still wanted to proceed because, in part, as one of the diplomats said, she wanted “to overthrow Gaddafi on the cheap.”

This left Stevens in the position of having to clean up the scandalous enterprise when it became clear that the “insurgents” actually were al-Qaeda – indeed, in the view of one of the diplomats, the same group that attacked the consulate and ended up killing Stevens.

To read the full story at PJ Media, click here…

Entry #553


JAP69Comment by JAP69 - May 23, 2013, 9:02 am
I read and or posted about a buyback of weapons from the insurgents. Maybe executive order or action for the funds. Where the weapons were to go after that I do not know.

My speculation is the weapons may have been supplied to Libyan insurgents.
sully16Comment by sully16 - May 23, 2013, 12:46 pm
The plot thickens
Jill34786Comment by Jill34786 - May 23, 2013, 2:04 pm
I have also heard that this deal went sour which is why in the eyes of our Government...especially Hillary Clinton that Ambassador Stevens was disposable.
This entire debacle will only get more interesting going forward and will not stop until our poor excuse of a commander in chief gets implicated.
MADDOG10Comment by MADDOG10 - May 23, 2013, 8:51 pm
I'll be so happy when the ICE finally melts and he's left stranded on the Berg. Couldn't happen to a nicer guy in my estimation...   He's a twisted sister just like the rest of the party...!
rdgrnrComment by rdgrnr - May 23, 2013, 10:58 pm
One thing Americans are known for is never leaving a man behind.
Unfortunately, Obozo doesn't hold that promise in very high regard.
He'll leave everybody behind to die if it conflicts with his getting his sleep for a fundraiser in Vegas the next day.
I mean he's a busy guy, know what I'm sayin'?
jarasanComment by jarasan - May 23, 2013, 11:30 pm
A crime, is a crime, is a crime, the statute of limitations is like 12 years for this treasonous stuff.

You must be a Lottery Post member to post comments to a Blog.

Register for a FREE membership, or if you're already a member please Log In.