From Powerlineblog.com concerning media leaks of top secret information.  Looks like they've waded into deep stink they may not be able to backstroke out of.

First link, Professor John Eastman's testimony is very complete and worth the time to read. 

Yesterday OpinionJournal posted Professor John Eastman's testimony

http://www.opinionjournal.com/federation/feature/?id=110008511 .

before a hearing conducted by the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence. In his testimony Professor Eastman addressed the media's criminal liability under the espionage laws for publishing classified information. It's a subject that's close to my heart; I devoted the Standard column "Exposure"

http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/006/631lksqg.asp

to it. Professor Eastman's testimony is consistent with, though more expansive than, my analysis. Professor Eastman comments on the

http://www.opinionjournal.com/extra/?id=110008320

by New York Times executive editor Bill Keller defending the Times's exposure of the NSA monitoring program. As Professor Eastman addresses Keller's letter, the baloney meets the grinder. (Thanks to Hugh Hewitt.) http://hughhewitt.com/

Posted by Scott at 07:07 AM

http://powerlineblog.com/archives/014406.php