Pelosi To Receive Baby-Killing's Highest Award Named After The Racist Margaret Sanger

Published:

Updated:

It's a well known and documented fact that Democrat Margaret Sanger started Planned Parenthood to kill black babies for her own racist agenda.

And very fittingly, Planned Parenthood is now giving Nancy Pelosi the Sanger Award, the highest honor in all of the baby-killing industry for her dogged determination and devotion to the cause. Nobody supports killing babies quite as energetically as Nancy. She loves it. 

http://thoughtfulwomen.org/2014/02/04/abortion-loving-pelosi-receives-award-named-racist/

I've never been ashamed to say that I'm a Catholic.

But I'm ashamed to say that this baby-killing hag claims to be one.

God help us.

Entry #831

Comments

Avatar sully16 -
#1
There's an award named after Margaret Sanger?
Everyday just brings just a little more sadness, just keeps getting heaped on.
Avatar MADDOG10 -
#2
Meanwhile Pelosi is at home gloating over her award. Should have been given to her boss also..
Avatar Candlelight777 -
#3
Yeh, this is a very disturbing issue that breaks my heart. Unless there is an extreme medical event that has taken place in a late term pregnancy, allowing a late term abortion for any other reason is in my eyes unjust and cruel behavior. Nancy and the president both are a disgrace to me when it comes to this matter and many in their own party disagree on late term abortion because it is so far reaching. I don't even agree with midterm abortion which republicans support as well for reasons such as rape that i find unacceptable and a disgrace as well. While no doubt the dems who support late term abortion have the most blood on their hands, republicans who support midterm abortion have blood on their hands as well. Wrong is wrong when it results in taking a life where a major medical event was not present for doing so.
Avatar Drenick1 -
#4
These monsters and those who patronize them want to make it legal to end a life right up until birth and yet they all complain about cruelty to animals and saving some unknown fish in California.
Avatar rdgrnr -
#5
Sully, I agree.
Avatar rdgrnr -
#6
DOG,
Roger that. He voted to allow killing them after a botched abortion when the baby was laying there with his arms outstretched waiting for the loving touch of his mother.
Avatar rdgrnr -
#7
CL77,
I didn't mention late-term abortion.
I'm talking about all abortion.
And I'm against ANYBODY, Republican, Democrat, Liberal or Conservative, ANYBODY who kills babies or supports killing babies or votes for people who support killing babies, they ALL have blood on their hands.
Every other political issue in this country is secondary to the killing of innocent babies.
First we stop killing babies and then we proceed with everything else.
We are awash in the blood of over 50 MILLION butchered babies in this country.
And the bloodthirsty, Godless Democrats want more.
Avatar rdgrnr -
#8
Drenick,
They do the work of their father. They work to complicate. They try to spread chaos and confusion as much as possible. They create problems and then volunteer to be the solution. It's all mumbo jumbo straight from the pits of hell. They even pervert the Word of God to achieve their ends (as our troll does). We fight against Evil.

The Word of God says:
For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.
-Ephesians 6: 12
Avatar Candlelight777 -
#9
CL77,
I didn't mention late-term abortion.
I'm talking about all abortion.
And I'm against ANYBODY, Republican, Democrat, Liberal or Conservative, ANYBODY who kills babies or supports killing babies or votes for people who support killing babies, they ALL have blood on their hands.
Every other political issue in this country is secondary to the killing of innocent babies.
First we stop killing babies and then we proceed with everything else.
We are awash in the blood of over 50 MILLION butchered babies in this country.
And the bloodthirsty, Godless Democrats want more.
***************************************************************************************************************************************

Why is it then we only hear about the democrats when you voice your outrage week after week regarding abortion, yet not one word of outrage towards your own party over the same issue Ridge

my My MY!!!.....the political hypocrisy Ridge
Avatar rdgrnr -
#10
@Candlelight
You're not serious, right?
You do know the historical perspectives of both parties regarding the abortion issue, do you not?
And did you not see my mention of Republicans in the post you quoted?
And now you call me a hypocrite?
Is the REAL Candlelight coming out to play now?
Avatar Candlelight777 -
#11

Ridge, the difference between you and me isn't how we feel about abortion, the difference is i call out both party's for their hand in abortion, you want to only make it about democrats while putting on blinders and turning your head the other way when it comes to republicans. You want to cherry pick and your track record on the matter speaks for itself. In this blog you state your against all forms of abortion and anyone who supports it, then you follow up with stating "You do know the historical perspectives of both parties regarding the abortion issue, do you not?"...are you now trying to excuse and sugar coat the undeniable fact that still stands and that is that republicans support midterm abortion? but according to you your against all forms of abortion, yet it seems you are still trying to muster up some form of acceptability for the republicans role in midterm abortion based on historical perspectives. Perspectives are one thing, actions is another. I certainly don't think all republicans support it nor do i think all democrats support abortion, but according to you and your blanket statements all democrats are baby killers which in turn means, according to your standards, that you support baby killers as well because your a republican and your party supports midterm abortion. Stereotyping suddenly takes on a different view when you look at it that way now doesn't it Ridge...because you are a republican yet don't support abortion. Shouldn't the blame be on those in your party who support it, not those who oppose it such as yourself? my point precisely.

Not all democrats are pro choice and surprise surprise not all republicans are pro life. Many republicans, and those numbers are growing everyday unfortunately, are members of the Republicans For Choice and The Wish List to name a few that are out there which represents a larger group of republicans who are pro choice and pushing for it's support. To name a few pro choice politicians, Senator Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) , Senator Mark Kirk (R-Illinois), Senator Susan Collins (R-Maine), Rep Shelly Moore Capital (R-West Virginia), Rep Rodney Frelinghuysen (R-NJ), Rep. Kay Granger (R-Texas) and so on and so on....these are a few examples of the expanding republican party that is pro choice. Some of these do not support "government funding" of abortion, but they do support pro choice.

Historical perspectives are unfortunately changing and have been for awhile Ridge. Glossing over your own party's part in this and sweeping it under the rug is only enabling your own party to not be accountable for their OWN actions and opening the door wider for this shift in the republican party towards pro choice. Republicans need to get their own party in order when it comes to abortion and I pray they will... because right now they have no grounds to be pointing fingers and the growing shifting positions on abortion within their own party is in question.

Post a Comment

Please Log In

To use this feature you must be logged into your Lottery Post account.

Not a member yet?

If you don't yet have a Lottery Post account, it's simple and free to create one! Just tap the Register button and after a quick process you'll be part of our lottery community.

Register