Comments

LiLSpeedy - Apr 25, 2014, 12:09 pm

#1

Jumping on the band wagon can prove to be quite embarrassing. Now repubs are running like roaches when the lights are turned on in the middle of the night.

rdgrnr - Apr 25, 2014, 1:04 pm

#2

Dam* straight the Republicans are repudiating him.
That's the difference between the parties.
Democrats will continue to support a fellow Democrat no matter what he does.
Even if he's a rapist.

lilluv - Apr 25, 2014, 4:05 pm

#3

They know the word racist is already written all over theirs faces and foul mouth.;)

LiLSpeedy - Apr 25, 2014, 9:29 pm

#4

The repubs condemned what Bundy said, but still supports him. What a freaking hypocrite.

CARBOB - Apr 26, 2014, 6:10 am

#5

@Speedy-lilluv- do either of you understand the difference between right and wrong. Their are mitigating circumstances in the Bundy case. Unlike Democrats, Republicans do not support someone based on the color of their skin.

LiLSpeedy - Apr 26, 2014, 10:45 am

#6

A hypocrite is a hypocrite Carbob. Stop making excuses for offensive racist remarks. And repubs do look at skin color. You are fooling yourself if you believe that nonsense.

CARBOB - Apr 26, 2014, 12:54 pm

#7

Then the entire Democratic party must be hypocrites. All the ones who voted for Obama, even the ones who voted multiple times and in multiple states, are hypocrites. Even you are a hypocrite for the remark about Whites stereo-typing Black women, when you knew all the time, the right answer.

LiLSpeedy - Apr 26, 2014, 1:39 pm

#8

You know for yourself that some Whites have a stereotype about everyone that is non-white, including Black women. A lot of this mentality stems from unwanted dominance that was prevalent during slavery.

rdgrnr - Apr 26, 2014, 9:38 pm

#9

The truth is starting to come out about the New York Times editing Bundy's remarks to fit their agenda.
We shoulda known.

LiLSpeedy - Apr 26, 2014, 10:53 pm

#10

I read what Bundy said. He was an idiot for saying it. No one can make slavery sound good. No one.

rdgrnr - Apr 26, 2014, 11:28 pm

#11

The NYTimes did some creative editing to change the real meaning of what he was saying.
Nothing new, they do it all the time, like all the liberal media does.

LiLSpeedy - Apr 27, 2014, 1:41 am

#12

He said it and tried to explain it and made it worse.

rdgrnr - Apr 27, 2014, 11:52 pm

#13

You fell for the NYTimes story.
Because you wanted it to be that way too.
Too bad it was a lie.

LiLSpeedy - Apr 28, 2014, 12:55 am

#14

You go with your theory, and I will go with mine. Now everybody is happy.

rdgrnr - Apr 29, 2014, 1:05 pm

#15

You don't have a theory, you have a phony story from the NYTimes that fits your agenda.

LiLSpeedy - Apr 29, 2014, 9:29 pm

#16

You are Assuming again.

Post a Comment

Please Log In

To use this feature you must be logged into your Lottery Post account.

Log In

Not a member yet?

If you don't yet have a Lottery Post account, it's simple and free to create one! Just tap the Register button and after a quick process you'll be part of our lottery community.

Register