Time to overthrow the Supreme court.

Well, I guess this won't be good enough either. Leaving his vacation, where he actually took the 'portable' version of the White House with him anyway, to come back and handle up on some things directly. Time to stir things up a bit since we're already headed down this 'dark alley'...much pun intended. At this point in Bush's presidency, he'd already taken some (407) vacation days compared to Obama's (125). I've been trying to find that clip with Obama looking into the camera and saying, "Now watch this drive!" after speaking on the Iraq issues.

Oh, wait a minute...that was Bush. My bad. I have challenge for all the haters out there. Next time you see a group of bicyclists on a ride, or even just one and they have on a 'helmet', just holler out and tell 'em they look like sissies just like the President with those helmets on. Better yet, go tell a police officer that patrols on a bicycle and wears a helmet. Dang it! I just Googled 'Bush with helmet on pics' and found some nice ones!

See: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/4756054.stm

Hmmmm, I don't think Obama fell off his bike, either. No wonder Bush couldn't efficiently run this country! Hell, he could barely ride a bike!!!! LMAO!!!! Yeah, even Rush tried to fix it all up and talk about how they, as kids, fell off their bikes, too. Big difference there, Rush, when you're on a smooth, paved road...and a grown man. My point is this: next time you're ready to harp on Obama, be sure to do a similar search and find Bush's 'equivalent' because it's there...and prolly much, much worse. I'm stirring it up, today, and I have a BIG spoon.

Lucky Loser - one of the reasons I left my party after a lifetime - they always blame past administrations for problems. I would rather they fixed the problems.   

You seem to bring up Bush often. He's been gone a long time - it's Obama's ship now.

Emily, Obama took over a ship that was already sunk, okay. I know that's not what you're trained to 'know' but, it's true. The numbers don't lie from when Bush took office, after Clinton, and what the numbers looked like, financially, after Bush. Then, there was the stock market...it was horrible. However, I under your faction for desiring to side step truth in order to uphold what you deem fit. The day that you're able to openly slam folks on both sides will be a day of liberation for you and your friends but, I doubt that'll happen openly. It'll be private as I've learned from my own friends and it's kind of funny how they do it. Until then, you're a prisoner of your people...no trying to brain wash you, or, reverse psychology here. Just truth. When you're afraid to think for yourself, you're already dead in the water. I have yet to see any articles posted of (R)'s and how they do wrong things everyday in any of your blogs...not a one. Ninety-nine percent of the time, Obama is the headline and I mean nearly everyday.

Hey, it's your blogs and prerogative. But, that's not merely disagreeing with a man's policies. Chuck Hagel is a (D) and he's not on the front page everyday. John Kerry, Holder, and the cabinet list goes on. Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama.......can you hear me now? None of you have poker faces. In terms of bringing up Bush, you actually sound just like Rush and Sean Hannity. When THEY want to talk about Bush in a positive comparison as opposed to Obama, it's cool and they entertain it to the fullest. But, when a (D) or (I) calls in with numbers/information that counters their agendas, they always say, "I don't wanna talk about Bush!!" or "We're not talking about Bush, okay, he's been out of office for years now!!!" I can show you a transcript if you'd really like proof of this, okay.

So, please Emily, don't come to me with this argument ever again...with respect to you, okay. You allow me to post in your blog and I honestly appreciate that by being very respectable when I write. I'm pretty sure you don't hate truth like the others do and I take no issue with you on reasonable stands for what you believe in. In all honesty, (D)'s and (I)'s are nowhere near as rambunctious as lots of (R)'s in their thoughts, actions, or beliefs. There are lots of great conservatives and I know this. These are the 'free-thinkers' not afraid to call it like it really is. One of these days a (D), the one you hate the most, just might be the one helping you in some way and it's refreshing to know that THEY prolly won't even know who they're really helping. Yeah, that's some well-seasoned food for thought right there from my special blend.

Why not bring up Bush? Repubs dig up Reagan all the time, besides Bush is the most recent.