Welcome Guest
Log In | Register )
You last visited December 4, 2016, 5:20 pm
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)

Scientific Games wrote parts of N.C. lottery law

North Carolina LotteryNorth Carolina Lottery: Scientific Games wrote parts of N.C. lottery law

A company that hopes to land the multimillion-dollar contract to run North Carolina's gambling operation used a link to House Speaker Jim Black to have the new lottery law written to its liking.

Alan Middleton, vice president of Scientific Games, wrote to Black's office, saying he wanted to write a law that excluded other companies. Middleton had an inside connection to the speaker's office, according to hundreds of pages of e-mail messages, memos and other documents released by Black's office Thursday at the newspaper's request.

The company's connection to Black was through Meredith Norris, who was the speaker's unpaid political director and also was on the company's payroll.

Gov. Mike Easley signed the bill, which used Middleton's words, into law Aug. 31.

One key part of the law — a section that Middleton provided — requires state officials to "investigate and compare" the business practices, reputations, civil litigation, criminal records and other background information of potential lottery vendors.

Another part guided by Middleton gives state officials leeway in choosing a vendor. It specifies that lottery commissioners shall "award the contract to the responsible lottery vendor who submits the best proposal that maximizes the benefits to the State."

Scientific Games, based in Alpharetta, Ga., is one of the nation's largest lottery companies. It also pointed out problems associated with GTECH Holdings of Rhode Island, its chief rival. Those include a conviction of a former top employee for kickbacks and investigations in several states and countries. GTECH has said those problems involve former employees.

Middleton wrote to Black's office that the changed language his company wrote "protects" the state from other vendors "trying to break (into) the market that have questionable backgrounds."

The changes, he wrote, also "may further tighten some existing companies that have checkered past and current issues."

GTECH spokeswoman Angela Geryak Wiczek said Thursday that her company did not know about Scientific Games' involvement in writing the law and described the provisions as "unusual."

The records obtained by News & Observer of Raleigh show that Scientific Games, got access to the speaker's office through Norris, who arranged at least one dinner with Black and Middleton at a Raleigh restaurant.

She also helped Middleton recruit House and Senate members for a yacht outing along the Seattle waterfront during a legislative conference days before the final lottery vote. It is not clear from the records which legislators, if any, took the two-hour cruise.

The newspaper said Black, Middleton and Norris could not be reached for comment Thursday.

The state is in the early stages or choosing a vendor or vendors to handle the instant ticket and lotto numbers games for the $1.2 billion-a-year state lottery, expected to begin within a year.

Scientific Games' efforts also included the Senate. Middleton wrote in a memorandum to Black's staff lawyer that he provided the same language governing contract awards to the Senate, and it was adopted in that version of the bill.

The leading Senate lottery sponsor, Tony Rand, D-Cumberland, said Thursday that he couldn't recall how the language ended up in the Senate version. He said his staff may have spoken with Middleton, although he did not.

"It's something I would approve of having in there, you know, maximizing the benefit to the state and that kind of thing," Rand said.

AP

We'd love to see your comments here!  Register for a FREE membership — it takes just a few moments — and you'll be able to post comments here and on any of our forums. If you're already a member, you can Log In to post a comment.

2 comments. Last comment 11 years ago by CASH Only.
Page 1 of 1
Avatar
Sparta, NJ
United States
Member #18331
July 9, 2005
1977 Posts
Offline
Posted: October 14, 2005, 10:21 am - IP Logged

Nothing new here. Advocates often have a hand in the way laws are written. I hope no one actually thinks an elected official knows anything about law! At the state level, there is seldom a staff to write laws, it is usually drafted by some group who has an interest in the end product. A long time ago, in a far away land - called Oklahoma - I was part of an advocate team that wrote a law. I even hand carried the master product between Senators offices for sign off, then brought it back to the "author" for submission. It is how things happen in the real world.

Cheers

|||::> *'`*:-.,_,.-:*''*:--->>> Chewie  <<<---.*''*:-.,_,.-:*''* <:::|||

I only trust myself - and that's a questionable choice


    United States
    Member #379
    June 5, 2002
    11296 Posts
    Offline
    Posted: October 31, 2005, 7:05 pm - IP Logged

    I wonder if that means NC won't be allowed to offer certain types of games. Supposedly the Match 6 format cannot be offered through GTech terminals.