Welcome Guest
Log In | Register )
You last visited December 3, 2016, 8:56 pm
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)

Editorial criticizes N.J. Lottery privatization proposal

New Jersey LotteryNew Jersey Lottery: Editorial criticizes N.J. Lottery privatization proposal

Privately run lottery faces long odds

Home News Tribune
Feb. 2, 2008

Give [New Jersey] state Senate President Richard J. Codey credit for trying.

Responding to the governor's assurance that he is open to ideas for solving the state's long-term budget woes, Codey, D-Essex, floated the notion of leasing the state's lucrative lottery. The way Codey figures it, the lottery might be worth billions upfront, and it might even produce some ongoing cash for the state if it is able to negotiate for a cut of the profits with whatever private entity takes over the lottery's operation.

The proposal was typical Codey: designed to appeal to voters but also seemingly intended to make the governor's own plans more palatable. Codey reasoned that the lottery income would not take the place of the governor's proposal for steep and rapid toll hikes, but it might make the hikes less drastic.

The devil, of course, is in the details.

For one thing, any proposal to privatize the lottery would have to be approved by voters, since the lottery's revenue is constitutionally dedicated to senior citizen and educational programs.

Far more serious is the fact that, while leasing the lottery might provide billions of dollars immediately, the state presumably would have to run without at least a portion of the nearly $1 billion the lottery pumps into its budget each year. Indeed, while Gov. Jon S. Corzine welcomed the idea, his office also cautioned that the lottery was efficiently run and that it seems unlikely a private company would be able to generate much more income than the state does, which means any money the state might get back would be reduced.

That doesn't mean the Legislature ought not take a look at the idea, especially given the governor's single-minded solution. But the Legislature needs to proceed cautiously and deliberately - and to consider the long-term costs as well as the short-term gains.

In the meantime, the history of the lottery suggests how dangerous government spending is. The lottery received voter approval on the promise that its proceeds would pay for all sorts of wonderful programs for children and senior citizens. The money may indeed have gone to those causes, but it also has become money crucial to the state's bottom line: what was sold as frosting is in fact the cake.

The lesson is that, in most cases, the government finds a way to spend all the money that is available to it; and, because legislators keep their jobs by providing things to voters, the tendency is to spend more and save less.

The error both the governor and the Senate president are making as they troll for ways to raise huge amounts of capital is in assuming that more money will get us out of this mess. More money may, in fact, be necessary. But more money, without some disciplined reassessment of how the state spends and saves the money it has, will eventually get us back to where we are now — only with fewer assets and fewer tricks up our sleeves.

Home News Tribune

We'd love to see your comments here!  Register for a FREE membership — it takes just a few moments — and you'll be able to post comments here and on any of our forums. If you're already a member, you can Log In to post a comment.

2 comments. Last comment 9 years ago by LckyLary.
Page 1 of 1
spy153's avatar - maren

United States
Member #28409
December 15, 2005
1198 Posts
Posted: February 7, 2008, 7:51 am - IP Logged

Maybe this site will reach many more people that make the difference in these decisions., Or help to influence the ones that make the decisions.  After all, LP is the seventh site on google results of the word "lottery."  And as research confirms, if you're not part of the top ten, you're not part of "it" at all.  The more places this gets posted and read, the better your odds of getting the word out. 

voir-vous dans mes reves!Cool


    United States
    Member #10720
    January 23, 2005
    933 Posts
    Posted: February 8, 2008, 8:42 pm - IP Logged

    Upside: a privatized Lottery probably can't be shut down when nj fails to produce a budget on time.

    Downside: whoever owns it or whatever might decide that computerized drawings are better for their bottom line or make other unwelcome changes like adding 50 more balls to the Pick-5 or increasing the takeout to 99 percent.