Welcome Guest
Log In | Register )
You last visited December 6, 2016, 3:06 am
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)

State cuts lottery winner's benefits

Topic closed. 106 replies. Last post 5 years ago by dopey7719.

Page 8 of 8
52
PrintE-mailLink
time*treat's avatar - radar

United States
Member #13130
March 30, 2005
2171 Posts
Offline
Posted: March 11, 2012, 11:28 am - IP Logged

 GE hasn't paid their fair share of taxes.

Companies that produce goods and services that the public wants ... should have their "fair share" of extortion determined by bureaucraps that produce nothing but waste, fraud, and abuse? No No

In neo-conned Amerika, bank robs you.
Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms should be the name of a convenience store, not a govnoment agency.

    dopey7719's avatar - Lottery-049.jpg
    Midlands, SC
    United States
    Member #69698
    January 14, 2009
    303 Posts
    Offline
    Posted: March 11, 2012, 7:31 pm - IP Logged

    Here is my problem who criticize people like this woman for still taking food stamps. That measly $200 a month she is getting in assistance, she paid for it in the $250,000 plus in taxes she paid. At that rate she will recoup her money in about 100 years or so. The other guy who started all of this he paid about $1.2 million in taxes so it will be several lifetimes before he gets his money back. 

    They are some of the biggest taxpayers in the country, they should be getting thank you letters from people. I bet half the people complaining about them are either living off their tax money they paid or have family members that are through some sort of social program. 

    Considering she won a million dollars initially and only got $700,000 before taxes, she was already in my opinion taxed an extra $300,000 right off the bat so her real taxes were closer to $600,000. If you win $500 on a scratch off ticket you get $500 and you don't pay taxes so I don't understand why when you win large amounts it gives them the right to effectively steal back almost half of the money. 

    The same politicians showing fake outrage over this are the same ones that pass large tax breaks for corporations and their buddies so they pay virtually no taxes. For example if you own 10 Subway restaurants you get no tax break and pay your full taxes, but if you are an auto plant or something else like that, you pay virtually no taxes. That does not seem fair now, does it?

    The problem with Amanda Clayton and the other guy is that they are poor and uneducated and don't know how to fight back and call people out on their hypocrisy. 

    In summation, I don't necessarily think they should be taking the assistance, but it is being paid out of their money, not yours or anyone elses.

    Thank you!  I think she is getting slaughtered over this...and I hate to say it but I kind of feel sorry for her.  I agree with everything you said above.