Welcome Guest
Log In | Register )
You last visited December 10, 2016, 9:06 pm
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)

Arkansas woman loses bid for $1M lottery ticket picked from trash

Topic closed. 87 replies. Last post 5 years ago by pick4master.

Page 5 of 6
51
PrintE-mailLink
Avatar
charlotte, nc
United States
Member #108516
March 26, 2011
53 Posts
Offline
Posted: May 2, 2012, 7:17 pm - IP Logged

That is what the lady that found the ticket get she shouldn't have said anything, however i feel like she should have to give the ticket up she didn't spend her $10 for it and the cashier

In the store was wrong for telling the original ticket holder that the ticket was a non winner.

    grwurston's avatar - 144
    Let's Go Rangers!!!
    bel air maryland
    United States
    Member #90251
    April 24, 2010
    4882 Posts
    Online
    Posted: May 2, 2012, 8:07 pm - IP Logged

      IMPORTANT INFORMATION: This ticket is a bearer instrument. Anyone possessing a winning ticket may claim the prize. Valid only for date(s) shown. Winner must claim the prize within 182 days of the drawing. All winners, tickets and transactions subject to Maryland State Lottery Agency Regulations and State law.

      TO CLAIM A PRIZE: Present this ticket to any Maryland State Lottery ticket agent. Validated winning tickets valued to $600 are eligible for INSTANT PAYOFF. Validated winning tickets higher than $600 will be paid by check after claim is filed. Void if torn or altered.

      As exactly written on the back of all lottery tickets.  I believe the first two sentences are quite clear. Case closed.

    "You can observe a lot just by watching." Yogi Berra, Hall of Fame baseball player.

    The numbers will tell you what numbers to play. Pay attention to the numbers.

    Don't just think outside the box, crush it.

      Cletu$2's avatar - Lottery-050.jpg
      S.E.Iowa
      United States
      Member #120504
      December 21, 2011
      534 Posts
      Offline
      Posted: May 2, 2012, 8:34 pm - IP Logged

        IMPORTANT INFORMATION: This ticket is a bearer instrument. Anyone possessing a winning ticket may claim the prize. Valid only for date(s) shown. Winner must claim the prize within 182 days of the drawing. All winners, tickets and transactions subject to Maryland State Lottery Agency Regulations and State law.

        TO CLAIM A PRIZE: Present this ticket to any Maryland State Lottery ticket agent. Validated winning tickets valued to $600 are eligible for INSTANT PAYOFF. Validated winning tickets higher than $600 will be paid by check after claim is filed. Void if torn or altered.

        As exactly written on the back of all lottery tickets.  I believe the first two sentences are quite clear. Case closed.

      I Agree!  Iowa & Illinois tickets say the same thing.Iowas tickets are worded a little differently,though.Both states allow you one year from the drawing date to claim your prize.Iowa requires that you be 21 to purchase a ticket,Illinois allows 18 year old to buy tickets.I'm assuming that Arkansas has similar wording on the back of its tickets.

      When I was a boy I was told that anybody could become President; I'm beginning to believe it. ~Clarence Darrow

      There ought to be one day - just one - when there is open season on senators. ~Will Rogers

        xmasbaby's avatar - Lottery-011.jpg
        New Member
        Los Angeles
        United States
        Member #57567
        January 10, 2008
        14 Posts
        Offline
        Posted: May 2, 2012, 8:43 pm - IP Logged

        LL,   

        Ridge, Sully and I agree that the Judge was wrong by awarding Ms. Duncan the winnings.  I feel if Mrs. Jones(the lady that found the ticket) loses her appeal Ms. Duncan(the lady that threw the ticket away) should do the right thing and split it with the lady that found the ticket.  If it wasn't for Mrs. Jones the ticket would still be in the trash.

        Hurray! No One could have said it better!  Thank you!

        Xmas BabySmiley Santa

          Lucky Loser's avatar - bucks
          Texas
          United States
          Member #86154
          January 30, 2010
          1649 Posts
          Offline
          Posted: May 2, 2012, 9:03 pm - IP Logged

          "Naw, I have to disagree with EVERYBODY HERE."

          Who's the EVERYBODY HERE you're disagreeing with?

          Everybody who posted before you (including me) had the same opinion you do.

          Yeah, I wrote this the wrong way...my mistake. For now, I'm gonna say this: I'd like to first see if the ticket was scanned, and, then displayed as a loser. There is a record of whether or not that ticket was scanned...and where. If it was the scanner's fault, then I certainly feel the original purchaser is entitled to the winnings...and should split it with the trash diver. If it wasn't for her diving, the ticket would, in fact, be long gone and a total loss by now.

          If it was simply misread by the purchaser, and thrown away, then she should receive nothing regardless if she spent her money on the ticket. This is something a player should check, double check, and then re-check before discarding. Should be interesting...


          L.L.


            time*treat's avatar - radar

            United States
            Member #13130
            March 30, 2005
            2171 Posts
            Offline
            Posted: May 3, 2012, 2:26 am - IP Logged

            @ time treat

             

             

             

            Lol here come the spell check police, There were a few other miss spellings in that post and thet's the only one you point out? You're getting soft.

            Never said anything about the spelling.

            'Found the idea that people still expect the courts to be consistent laughable, though.

            Your try at deflection is what's soft.

            In neo-conned Amerika, bank robs you.
            Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms should be the name of a convenience store, not a govnoment agency.

              time*treat's avatar - radar

              United States
              Member #13130
              March 30, 2005
              2171 Posts
              Offline
              Posted: May 3, 2012, 3:32 am - IP Logged

              Does that mean she will get a different Judge the next time around?

              Usually they get a different judge each round, but there have been cases where the same judge heard the case (argued from a different angle) on appeal.

              In neo-conned Amerika, bank robs you.
              Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms should be the name of a convenience store, not a govnoment agency.

                Avatar
                Kentucky
                United States
                Member #32652
                February 14, 2006
                7322 Posts
                Offline
                Posted: May 3, 2012, 9:29 am - IP Logged

                Yeah, I wrote this the wrong way...my mistake. For now, I'm gonna say this: I'd like to first see if the ticket was scanned, and, then displayed as a loser. There is a record of whether or not that ticket was scanned...and where. If it was the scanner's fault, then I certainly feel the original purchaser is entitled to the winnings...and should split it with the trash diver. If it wasn't for her diving, the ticket would, in fact, be long gone and a total loss by now.

                If it was simply misread by the purchaser, and thrown away, then she should receive nothing regardless if she spent her money on the ticket. This is something a player should check, double check, and then re-check before discarding. Should be interesting...


                L.L.


                Doesn't anybody actually look at the numbers on the ticket?

                I've cashed tickets I thought matched 2 numbers and found out I matched 3 numbers and matched 8 playing Ten-Oh when thought I matched 7. Cashed tickets I thought matched 3 numbers but only matched 2, but at least I knew I had some of the numbers and won something. If I tried to cash a ticket I thought won something and it said "sorry not a winner", I would recheck the ticket against the results.

                The reason we read about all the scams is because some players are to lazy to check the results. They hand thousands of dollars worth of unsigned tickets to clerks every day. Even the woman that won twice on the same day handed a clerk $2 million worth of unsigned tickets to be checked. Basically this judge award the money to a player for being extraordinarily stupid.

                  savagegoose's avatar - ProfilePho
                  adelaide sa
                  Australia
                  Member #37136
                  April 11, 2006
                  3301 Posts
                  Offline
                  Posted: May 3, 2012, 10:40 am - IP Logged

                  i see women tear up losing scratchers into little itty bitty peices when they toss em out. now there is someone who definately doesnt wasnt someone picking up their lost ticket.I feel the dumpster diver deserves a little  something.

                  as the whoe mess would never have benn  out there if it wasnt her effort. man if i was the winner/ purchaser id prob hand over half, just  to be that someone special that  stands for justice. cuz i sure as hewck couldnt live with myself knowing i thought it a loser. but then ther lotto scanner needs to be smashed as well. i guess if i was the judge i would order lotto to fix its scanners and [pay both ladies.

                  2014 = -1016; 2015= -1409; 2016 JAN = -106; FEB= -81; MAR= -131; APR= - 87: MAY= -91; JUN= -39; JUL=-134; AUG= -124; SEP = -123; OCT= -84  NOV=- 73 TOT= -3498

                  keno historic = -2291 ; 2015= -603; 2016= JAN=-32, FEB= +12 , MAR= -86, APR = -77. MAY= -48, JUN= -29, JUL=-71; AUG = -52; SEPT= -43; OCT = +56 NOV = -33 TOT= -3297

                    Avatar
                    New Member

                    United States
                    Member #127529
                    May 3, 2012
                    1 Posts
                    Offline
                    Posted: May 3, 2012, 10:58 am - IP Logged

                    I find it interesting the store where it was bought 1st tried a lawsuit, when that didn't work this other lady joined in.  Do you think maybe they all know each other and and all are trying to split the money....HMMMMMMMMMMMM

                      Lucky Loser's avatar - bucks
                      Texas
                      United States
                      Member #86154
                      January 30, 2010
                      1649 Posts
                      Offline
                      Posted: May 3, 2012, 11:42 am - IP Logged

                      Doesn't anybody actually look at the numbers on the ticket?

                      I've cashed tickets I thought matched 2 numbers and found out I matched 3 numbers and matched 8 playing Ten-Oh when thought I matched 7. Cashed tickets I thought matched 3 numbers but only matched 2, but at least I knew I had some of the numbers and won something. If I tried to cash a ticket I thought won something and it said "sorry not a winner", I would recheck the ticket against the results.

                      The reason we read about all the scams is because some players are to lazy to check the results. They hand thousands of dollars worth of unsigned tickets to clerks every day. Even the woman that won twice on the same day handed a clerk $2 million worth of unsigned tickets to be checked. Basically this judge award the money to a player for being extraordinarily stupid.

                      Very good points here and I dig people that call it like they see it. We all have a responsibility to personally, and thoroughly, check our tickets against the official results. Also, here's something else lots of people may not know: A winning lottery ticket sounds a certain way if it's, in fact, a winner upon being scanned. If it's a not a winner, it'll read the bar code, pause, and then just "BEEP". A winning ticket will be read, paused, then the machine will begin to print the prize amount.

                      Now, this is only for tickets ran back through the actual ticket printer...not the scanner only. I think I know why so many people throw away winning scratch-off tickets, too. Some of these tickets provide so many different ways to win that players simply overlook a win because it's hard to interpret it. Some players forget to scratch the whole ticket...leaving a prize amount completely untouched. Others read the symbols wrong and think they've lost when actually, they've won. 

                      Lots of room for error and this is why players should pay very close attention to what they're doing.


                      L.L.

                        Avatar
                        new york
                        United States
                        Member #123017
                        February 11, 2012
                        124 Posts
                        Offline
                        Posted: May 3, 2012, 2:27 pm - IP Logged

                        i really hope this gets turned on appeal because this will set a very dangerous precedent.

                          Avatar
                          ozone park
                          United States
                          Member #57042
                          December 15, 2007
                          274 Posts
                          Offline
                          Posted: May 3, 2012, 4:45 pm - IP Logged

                          Not saying anything is just as bad if not worse. Usually the cover-up is worse than the actually crime or mistake that was made from the onset. And we still do not know how this all came about. They never said if the woman said it or if it was just public information that made people aware of the circumstances in this case. But either way, if in fact their was an attempt to validate the ticket and the machine gave false information out, it is not the ticket holders responsibility that the machine malfunctioned. I find that hard to believe but anything is possible. But if the woman threw  the ticket out and never tried to validate the ticket and than someone comes along and takes the tickets out of the garbage, for second chance drawings I believe that it is the persons who found the ticket and either way the store owner/employee has nothing to do with this no matter what the circumstances were.. This only goes to show you, sign all tickets, winners or losers to at least protect your interest if the ticket is for a larger prize or even first prize monies. The reality for people to become instant millionaires is more of a reality now than ever before.


                            United States
                            Member #123632
                            February 25, 2012
                            156 Posts
                            Offline
                            Posted: May 3, 2012, 10:53 pm - IP Logged

                            Has anyone considered the amount of money that was spent by the lottery itself on read out scanners that simply do not work? What is the use of having read out scanners if they dont work? Would anyone buy a toilet seat that doesnt work a faucet a garage door anythin in this frinkin world if it doesnt work. This whole eposode began because the lottery installed read out scanners that simply do not work? It makes you wonder if you've ever thown away a winning ticke in the past.

                            This whole strory began when a women threw away a ticket that "the LOTTERIES READ OUT SCANNER" claimed was a loser. It said "SORRY NOT A WINNER" what kind of bull is that? So I check my ticket the scanner says its not a winnr I throw it away someone else goes through the trash find it and turns it in. And I am out everything all becaus of the "LOTTERYS READ OUT SCANNER" Wow thank you lottery people who created this whole scenrio in my life. How can I ever thank you.

                             

                            Either have machines that work or stop spending money on faulty machines. That is a waste of money.

                             

                            Or simply do a Solomon and split the baby in half

                             

                            Split the money between the two women and be done with it.

                            Its not the womans fault that the scanner the lottery so invested in do not work and its not the womens falt who found the ticket.

                             so just split it and bedone with it.

                            Again whats the use of having scanners if they dont work?

                             

                            they're useless.

                              Bigheadnick's avatar - badluck
                              Taunton, Ma
                              United States
                              Member #123005
                              February 11, 2012
                              136 Posts
                              Offline
                              Posted: May 4, 2012, 12:37 am - IP Logged

                               @ time treat ---  I keep forgetting to quote

                               

                              My mistake then, I thought you were isolating the word because I spelled it wrong. Back to my point and you disagreeing with it then. Yes the courts should be consistent. I think as Americans we have the right to expect as much. Most legal arguments all come down to consistency. This is the whole concept behind arguing case law. You cant say 1+1 = 2 on tuesday then say it equals 6 on friday. Sure you don't think it's realistic of me to expect but I do. And if we just laugh and don't call foul when judges contradict eachother then a piece society will crumble. Not to be dramatic about it  or anything...

                              Scratchies for the win!

                              We are in a two-party dictatorship. You want change ? Vote third partyThumbs Up