Welcome Guest
Log In | Register )
You last visited December 4, 2016, 5:20 pm
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)

N.D. LOTTERY: Board supports two extra games

North Dakota LotteryNorth Dakota Lottery: N.D. LOTTERY: Board supports two extra games
North Dakota gamblers may have their pick of two additional lotteries next year, which offer smaller prizes and less daunting odds than the more widely played Powerball game.

A state advisory board agreed Tuesday to support North Dakota's entry into the Hot Lotto and Wild Card 2 lotteries. Both are operated by the Multistate Lottery Association of West Des Moines, Iowa, which runs Powerball.

The association already has approved North Dakota's request to sell Powerball tickets and state officials hope the game will get under way by April 2004.

Chuck Keller, the state's interim lottery director, said representatives of states that offer the Hot Lotto and Wild Card 2 games will decide later whether North Dakota is allowed to join.

Powerball is played in 24 states, including Montana, South Dakota and Minnesota. Wild Card 2 is sold in Idaho, Montana and South Dakota; Hot Lotto is played in Iowa, Minnesota, Montana, New Hampshire, South Dakota and West Virginia.

The odds of winning the Powerball jackpot, which has a minimum amount of $10 million, are about 120.5 million to one, according to the lottery association.

Hot Lotto has a minimum grand prize of $1 million, with odds of 10.9 million to one. The odds of winning Wild Card 2's minimum top prize of $100,000 is 1.35 million to one. All three games also have lesser prizes, with shorter odds.

Last November, North Dakota voters agreed to change the state Constitution to allow the state to participate in multistate lotteries.

During the Legislature, some lawmakers argued the state should take part in the Powerball game only. However, a proposal to limit lottery participation to Powerball was defeated, and lottery rules now being drafted also include the two smaller games.

A five-member advisory board, headed by Rep. RaeAnn Kelsch, R-Mandan, is reviewing the proposed rules. During a meeting Tuesday, its members agreed that North Dakota should seek entry into the Hot Lotto and Wild Card 2 games.

"One of the things that I have been told by people is, we want to have a couple of other games where our chances are better," Kelsch said.

"People are going to look at those and say, 'Well, I'm going to play Powerball,'" Kelsch said. "But I'm also going to play these, and make it a little bit more entertaining."

AP

We'd love to see your comments here!  Register for a FREE membership — it takes just a few moments — and you'll be able to post comments here and on any of our forums. If you're already a member, you can Log In to post a comment.

5 comments. Last comment 13 years ago by CASH Only.
Page 1 of 1

United States
Member #379
June 5, 2002
11296 Posts
Offline
Posted: August 27, 2003, 7:04 am - IP Logged

I'm all for ND getting into Hot Lotto.

    Avatar

    United States
    Member #434
    June 30, 2002
    675 Posts
    Offline
    Posted: August 27, 2003, 8:48 am - IP Logged

    Nice to see that it's pretty much official. I'm sure you are very happy today CASH.


      United States
      Member #379
      June 5, 2002
      11296 Posts
      Offline
      Posted: August 28, 2003, 11:18 am - IP Logged

      smd:                                                                                                        I don't think MUSL has officially "approved" ND selling Hot Lotto.  Remember that all three US neighbors of ND offer HL.

        Avatar

        United States
        Member #434
        June 30, 2002
        675 Posts
        Offline
        Posted: August 29, 2003, 5:01 am - IP Logged

        I don't see why MUSL wouldn't approve them.


          United States
          Member #379
          June 5, 2002
          11296 Posts
          Offline
          Posted: August 29, 2003, 7:04 am - IP Logged

          smd:                                                                                                      MN, MT, and SD each border ND; the three states would lose some HL play to ND.                                                                                  However, if DE or DC were to consider HL, there would be "no" opposition because DE and DC do not border any HL states.