Search

3.086 / 5.000 To create a tracking system using rhythmic mathematics, similar to a musical pattern,Reply
hello=The need for a system to apply 27 musical patterns (where each note indicates whether the number will be equal to, lower than, or higher than the last draw) to filter the 1,000 Pick3 combinations was identified. The implementation of this system works as follows: Each pattern (0-repeat, 1-lower than, 2-higher than) is applied position by position relative to the last Pick3 draw. For each position, sets of valid numbers are generated: only those equal to, lower than, or higher than
Oct 27, 2025, 3:36 pm - dr san - Lottery Discussion Forum

So if you find a winning formula, it's considered fraud?Reply
A system has a value if it keeps you in a budget. After trying all manner of things over the last 20+ years I agree there is no magic formula. I also play the PA pick 3, the one that had the 666 fix ... so the fairly is sometimes in question, but the results are random enough. The one combo I play is nothing more than a best guess, and when it hits, is purely coincidental. No disillusionment here. No trapping or wheels either... I could just as easily play a QP and have the same chance o
Oct 20, 2025, 7:22 am - hypersoniq - Lottery Discussion Forum

You Can't Lose If You Don't PlayReply
As an occasional Clown, I here and now admit that I have down voted a few of your posts. Only the ones in which you proclaimed yourself the Greatest I know most of those posts followed receiving the wrath of a few of the folks here on LP. This time I up voted your post. I have not worked on Pick 3 in a very long time. Once upon a time, I created quite a few Excel files that filtered Pick 3 by just about every Idea presented here on the Forum. Shout out to Winsulosum for creating a file
Oct 7, 2025, 10:35 pm - AllenB - Lottery Discussion Forum

because in lotteries the more you study, the more difficult it becomes to predict the next drawReply
There is not the need to study the data as much IF you learn to write proper back tests for whatever systems you work with. At the very least, any system would need to be profitable OVER TIME... and I have yet to back test a system that was, even on the pick 3. I even ran a back test once on a raspberry pi that back tested every single replacement strategy. It ran through 10 billion iterations and took days... the result was a replacement list that exactly matched the most frequent follower for
Aug 14, 2025, 12:00 am - hypersoniq - Lottery Discussion Forum

Lottery Post for the Hobbyist and Serious Lottery PlayerReply
If you claim you have some edge on pick 3 drawings, show us the profit/loss statements. Even though I haven't won, my system is impeccable. I am the Lotterologist! The greatest lottery player on earth!!!!
Aug 11, 2025, 2:32 pm - Lotterologist - Lottery Discussion Forum

Lottery Post for the Hobbyist and Serious Lottery PlayerReply
I'm not negative, I'm realistic. If you were a subatomic particle you would be an electron because it has a negative charge. Pick 3 cannot be beat by employing any kind of system or strategy. As Norman Vincent Peele, author of The Power Of Positive Thinking , used to say, Can't is just the word can with a t on the end.
Aug 10, 2025, 11:59 pm - Lotterologist - Lottery Discussion Forum

Following up on the (now locked) Neural Net Lottery Picker thread — the backtest problemReply
Markov chains seemed like an interesting approach. I put this to followers as that seemed to be the most straight forward application... get a distribution of the numbers (all of them) that followed the last draw and present the distribution list, sorted by frequency descending... this is literally the layout of the transition probabilities for each state transition (draw). Even though, like the lottery, Markov Chains are memoryless and only depend on the last state, lottery data does not even d
Jun 27, 2026, 12:40 pm - hypersoniq - Lottery Discussion Forum

Is there any method or system that can an predict the first digit that will fall in Pick 3Reply
Had this type of the odds are debates many times and usually both sides are saying the same thing but expressing it differently. Some divide the number of outcomes by the number of chances and others divide the number chances by the number of outcomes and get a percentage. In the first example 1000 divided by 2 equals 500 to 1. In the second, 2 divided by 1000 equal .002 which is the inverse of 500 to 1. Most standard calculators have a inverse 1/x button. If we put in 500 and hit the 1/x b
Feb 21, 2026, 1:13 am - Stack47 - Lottery Discussion Forum

Looking Back - Looking ForwardReply
Any new plans or new strategies going into 2026? Moving the two python scripts (classifying hot/cold/neutral and first order Markov chain of followers) into a fully functional GUI for windows and android. Any lottery lessons learnt in 2025? System development is more fun than playing Biggest single win in 2025? $500 on pick 3, once on each system.
Dec 31, 2025, 11:59 pm - hypersoniq - Lottery Discussion Forum

Most statistics show frequency in relation to past draws, but what if we calculated the frequenciesReply
...your posts are the antithesis of everything I know to be true in relation to the Lottery. One day soon, I'm gonna start hitting 4 to 5 numbers on Pick 6 games, and there shall be sustainable consistency. I will learn how to post images here to show my winnings. But even now, I can show sustainable consistency of hitting 2 to 3 numbers right on the regular. Keep in mind, Dr. San, the lottery games are designed by human minds. You have to look at it as a business generating revenue, not a p
Nov 24, 2025, 11:59 am - Ney1 - Lottery Discussion Forum