Search

Should a winning system be posted on the LP?Reply
States aren't interested in winning lottery systems, what concern some states are vendors claiming their systems are such with no proof. I remember reading an LP news story about a mid-western state banning a company doing business within its boarders because of such claims. I don't claim to have a winning system although I have gotten lucky a few times using what I have. I'm always on the look out for something that might work better.
Nov 3, 2013, 4:40 pm - RJOh - Lottery Systems Forum

How are you creating your lotto system ?Reply
Sometimes its what people perceive that wins. I've bought state of the art software from several vendors and most just give endless charts,graphs and tons of numbers, but hardly any winners. I think a lot of the systems in the lottery market started out from ideas and trial and error. Not every sytem works for every state. If there is a rigid structure then there is no room for improvement. I think these systems are great and this is what this site is all about! And, I agree with CW4 to go outsi
Oct 11, 2011, 11:04 am - lakerben - Lottery Systems Forum

Lottery SystemReply
That may not be your intentions but lately some players after sharing their systems with some of the newer members were told the the truth about how worthless their systems were. Older members usually just say Thanks for sharing and let it go at that. Truth is, if even commercial lottery systems and software preformed as most players expected and vendors guaranteed lotteries would be out of business. Instead, they're making more profit every year.
Jun 26, 2011, 10:53 am - RJOh - Lottery Systems Forum

has anyone ever won big using a GH systemReply
Ever wonder why all those claims by software vendors about their software winning big in the past only worked for one person per lottery in spite of the fact that they have thousands of users? Each lottery drawing only has one set of winning numbers and if any software was really picking the best numbers to play for a particular drawing then those numbers would be the same for all its users. Some software may be helpful for analyzing past drawing histories but when it comes to picking numbers t
Jun 20, 2005, 4:35 pm - RJOh - Lottery Systems Forum

Lottosync 1.8 Free predictions newsletterReply
PA Cash5 (5/39), PA Match6 (6/49), MUSL Powerball (5/53 + 1/42)3 number demo of 1.8? sounds interesting. 3 numbers right in the powerball with powerplay pays $14, $21, $28 up to $35... I only play one ticket now, adding another woud be no big deal.If, over the life of the demo (30 draws? 20 draws?) it is right enough to cover 1/2 the cost of synch 1.8, I will break my own rule and buy a copy of synch1.8... you will have succeeded where ALL other vendors have failed... I never did spend a dime on
Jul 31, 2004, 9:14 am - hypersoniq - Lottery Systems Forum

Busting the Keno Bank!Reply
I have played all NY games over the years and am still on the losing track. Pick 10 is like a stepchild as it is not promoted and does not have a large following, as the other games have. The cut off time to buy tickets is same as the evening pick 3/4, which is 7:30 PM. The results for the pick3/4 are drawn on TV-ch 7 at 7:40 PM and at 8:00 PM at the lottery vendors, however, the pick 10 results are not available till after 9:00 PM, and there is not a set time. This is very strange and create
Feb 22, 2005, 12:19 am - js1237 - Lottery Systems Forum

Gail Howard softwareReply
Quote: Originally posted by BobP on July 15, 2004 ... select 24 numbers get two, three or four right. Select 36 numbers get three or four right sometimes five.Can't you do that with any software?Taking Lottery Director for an example because I'm most familiar with it. Other software users are certainly welcome to give other examples.Just taking 24 numbers from two of LD's automatic pick lines. 12 numbers from the Current Wins Line (a.k.a. hot ).12 numbers from the Single Index Line (a.k.a. ove
Jul 16, 2004, 11:31 pm - CDEX - Lottery Systems Forum

Best Pick-5 and 6 Lottery SoftwareReply
Quote: Originally posted by Greg on January 15, 2004 In my view, the trick is NOT whose software you are using. Rather, the trick is HOW you utilize the software's FEATURES, that is, the information or data the software presents. All lottery software basically has the same features with rare exception (although they might present the data in a slightly different way).A lottery player skilled at interpreting data, forecasting (not predicting) data, and using common strategies adeptly is going to
Feb 9, 2004, 10:52 am - Andrew - Lottery Systems Forum

How To Play and Win The Pick3 LotteryReply
Sorry, but I've been really busy for the last few weeks and thought I would respond to the topic on Walshs' systems or ebooks. I speak from experiecne since I purchased both the Pick 3 and Pick 4 from him. The real beauty of the system(s) is you can back test from today until 1980 and the results will look awesome. But then try to apply the same logic to the draws going forward and it's a whole new ballgame. I can basically take most any system out there and back test it and make it fit a
Jun 28, 2010, 5:51 pm - majakman - Lottery Systems Forum

Gail Howard softwareReply
OK, that does clarify it.In your message:> I was reffering to the data I generated> with my program on Florida Lotto 6/53.> They seem not to be typical rates.> I wanted your comment on that.Below is your data from the earlier message. I think this is what you are referrint to.> My proposed results are:>> Matching 0 of 24: 0 (wosre than 0,62)> Matching 1 of 24: 2 (worse than 3,72)> Matching 2 of 24: 7 (worse than 8,57)> Matching 3 of 24: 8 (worse than 9,67) or 0,83
Jul 18, 2004, 5:09 pm - CDEX - Lottery Systems Forum