Search

There is no Math when it come to winning.Reply
I liked the structure in your post Ricky. I find much truth to it; and truth to the RNG draws the officials use to conduct most games also. I've commented on the RNG stuff b4, and I'm sure they know that players like us are trying to use math to crack the code. I find it entertaining challenging to study the stats of math for the games I play. But without knowing what, how and when the officials conduct the draws, for the Public winning numbers, it remains difficult. As someone earlier said in t
Jun 27, 2009, 3:43 pm - L J1 - Mathematics Forum

Predicting number patterns?Reply
OK everyone go to my blogs I have now altered my sheet to allow you to see the patterns go to the ID columns look down it yellow is the normal color I use in here but I have now highlighted some patterns for you to study as I am fed up with hearing there is no pattern, the lines have different colors for you to Identify some of the patterns all the colors contain the lines with the numbers the lines in yellow contain the empty cells ID mark 1 the column to the right I am sure seeing is believing
Apr 27, 2009, 4:08 pm - billybouy - Mathematics Forum

Looking the mathematic formula or a good program summingReply
John, You perfectly right when writing about the to numberous possibilities about sums , particulary with a game that has 70 numbers in its field. So like any lottery game you have to see the best pattern to increase your odds. So why i do bet mostly not exceeding 6 numbers which worth 1,000.$ for a perfect match 6/6 or 25.$ for a 5/6 , still not bad to refund oftently what you spend in tickets, my average being 5 tickets a day. Here the cost is 1.$ by play and a coupon afford you to play
Feb 4, 2009, 10:02 am - rayal - Mathematics Forum

How many of you if you had the time will study Probability just for funReply
Don't we study probability right here at lottery post? Figuring out what the probabilities of what the next drawings numbers are.
Jul 23, 2008, 6:58 pm - JAP69 - Mathematics Forum

Where did you learn coding?Reply
I am surprised (and amused) that so many people learned by self-study. I had a VIC-20, too. Massive 3583 bytes of free memory.
Dec 11, 2007, 5:03 am - time*treat - Mathematics Forum

Chaos-Order DualityReply
I've come across something interesting. It's more like a stumble and take notice while theorizing. It relates to a theory/discovery I made quite a number of years ago, about 15-18 years. I have a non-published copyrighted text that shows the relationship between electric charge and gravitational charge. The name of the text is, It's About Time... It all makes sense now with my study in combinatorics and chaos-order duality. It might explain why particles decay, why gravity was and still is the
May 10, 2007, 11:24 am - JADELottery - Mathematics Forum

The Pick 3 Benford MatrixReply
Well, I dont want to take this study too far ofcourse, however, I think there is a relationship. One reason why there was 66.6% hit rate with sums 10-19, is that there are more combos in this range than 0-9 and 20-27 range. Although, I have no mathematical factual basics, I believe that the end digits 0-5 are most likely. Therefore, Im thinking skips 11-15 are more likely than skips 16-19. Well probably because of something you said before. If something has been out 2-9 draws, then the further o
Feb 3, 2007, 10:41 pm - WSN1 - Mathematics Forum

Star powerReply
Unlike many cultural traditions which treat science and religion as antithetical to each other, the Hindu tradition encourages the study of physics and metaphysics both for a comparative understanding of the true nature of the cosmic mystery surrounding and pervading the universe http://www.hindunet.org/hindu_history/ancient/mahabharat/mahab_sarasvat.html
Dec 7, 2006, 1:40 pm - Blackapple - Mathematics Forum

Combinatorial SymmetryReply
I don't know anything about a book, Combinations for Dummies, or anything like that. I know a little bit about combinatorics, and do some research and study in the areas of Mathematics and Physics in general and any other subheadings that might be related.
Nov 14, 2006, 2:32 am - JADELottery - Mathematics Forum

Excel VS. VBReply
well, the bad news is that the routine may be too long for me to post here, but the good news is I just saved a bunch of money... umm... the routine is easy to understand. You basicallydim numbers(999) as integer <--- there is an automatic 0 spacefor cellsrow = 1 to (whatever) if cell(cellrow, column).value < > then number(cell(cellrow,column).value) = _ number(cell(cellrow,column).value) +1 end ifnext cellrowfor digits = 0 to 999 cells(output_row + digit
Nov 25, 2005, 1:08 pm - time*treat - Mathematics Forum