Search

Neural Net Lottery PickerReply
Hi Hathor202. I cannot send you a program, as it is blocked by the administration. You have few posts.
Dec 22, 2020, 1:22 am - Miha69 - Mathematics Forum

Backtesting and Simulating Lottery SystemsReply
...a lot of those attempts rely on nuances easily corrected by the lottery administrations if the systems worked... Many of those nuances are just the natures of the game and there's nothing lottery administration can or would do to change them and still have an honest game. For example in Ohio 649 game, 50% of the winning combinations have 2 or more adjacent numbers while only one third of PowerBall and MegaMillions have them, so avoiding those types of combinations might give a PB or MM
Apr 13, 2011, 12:39 pm - RJOh - Mathematics Forum

Mathematics and the LotteryReply
According to my state, 26.3% goes to the main fund ('profit'), 1.4% goes to secondary programs (unclaimed prizes), 5% goes to retailer commissions, 4.4% goes to lottery administration, and 62.9% goes to players in the form of prizes. But obviously that is overall, not for Pick 3. I have never encountered a store reluctant to pay any amount. They are not even charged for packs of scratch-offs until at least 70% of the pack has been sold, or 45 days has passed after activating it. To my knowled
Sep 8, 2013, 4:28 pm - LottoMetro - Mathematics Forum

What Does It Take To Win (Mathematically Speaking?)Reply
From a strictly practical perspective the lottery administration is doing a sufficient job if players can't predict the results of future draws to gain advantages over other players. If anyone anywhere is able to do that they've kept it well hidden. A few repeated jackpot winners are around and one of them has a PHD in math. If she has anything more than a a luckier streak than other players she doesn't admit to it and she hasn't been in the news lately. Some of her wins were high value scratche
Mar 18, 2011, 10:04 am - JosephusMinimus - Mathematics Forum

Mathematics and the LotteryReply
I am not sure that it is cheaper. IT is not cheap, often it is not buying but renting software and paying repairs or changes. Real drawings requiring more paper? That you can automize like they did with the entire administration everywhere. Hardly anything still works on paper even if that is cheaper. Finally they often use more employees on systems that are set with too hard restrictions. Nobody knows anything. Drawings are always behind closed doors. If people are allowed to watch, there are
Feb 4, 2014, 12:26 pm - SergeM - Mathematics Forum

I Believe hitting lottery is all mathematics-- I can prove it!Reply
Badger: Mouse over Forums on the blue drop-down Menu bar at the top of the page. Scroll down to the bottom of the list, and click on Help (under LotteryPost Administration ). This brings up the Help forum. The tenth item down is entitled, Posting an Image in a Forum Message, Blog Entry, or for your Avatar. Click on the title, and follow Todd's instructions.
Sep 25, 2009, 6:38 pm - jim695 - Mathematics Forum

What Does It Take To Win (Mathematically Speaking?)Reply
JosephusMinimus, You said, From a strictly practical perspective the lottery administration is doing a sufficient job if players can't predict the results of future draws to gain advantages over other players. If anyone anywhere is able to do that they've kept it well hidden. It must have slipped your mind, because fairly recently, it's been claimed and well publicized: For the record, I win between $500.00 to $1000.00 per year more then I spend. I play between 25 and 35 times a year
Mar 18, 2011, 3:38 pm - jimmy4164 - Mathematics Forum