Search

Pick 3 + Pick 4 System: Core Fusion ParticlesReply
mng822 - Thanks for the info. You got some backtesting speed. There's no right way to backtest. As Bobp mentioned, there are many different ways to backtest. Best to spend some time before spend some money. Take time and test all variables; mid to eve, eve to mid, mid to mid, eve to eve. Then hold it for few days vs a week vs 24hrs. From each of the tests you'll get different hits. Which ever produce more hits say; eve to eve, hold the combos it for 72hrs, will most likely repeat for next week.
Jun 20, 2011, 3:19 am - diamondpalace - Lottery Systems Forum

Fresh Start.."Be where the action is"!!5/16/11Reply
Test for VA NC SC GA FL NY DC NJ 440 400 839 784 875 042 599 559 Test for KY IL TN FL IN OH 177 117 843 942 618 041 751 265 I am trying to see if I can narrow states. In my backtesting it is working but sometimes it may take 3 days.
Jun 15, 2011, 12:01 pm - win4life - Pick 3 Forum

i'm so excited i stumble across this today please readReply
nice finding im excited 4 u to be able to predict or hit u have to adopt to various ways which u will find out do more researching, backtesting and look for trends so when the opportunity presents its self u execute its lotto remember that good luck
Jun 13, 2011, 8:09 pm - thegee - Pick 3 Forum

Pick-3 Scientific calculator methodReply
Another idea i came up with is take the last draw (438) and get the total. Example:999-438 =561. Then do the +111,-111. Or get the total 561 and invert with your calculator. 561 inverted or one over key =.001782531. Possible picks 001 178 825 531. Mirror: 556 623 370 086. I did some backtesting and its promising. I'm going to try on paper for tomorrows NM P3. last draw 970, so 999-970= 029. 029 inverted = 034482759. 034 403 482 842 759, Mirrors :589 958 937 397 204.
May 29, 2011, 9:31 pm - lakerben - Lottery Systems Forum

Interest In Backtesting and Simulating Lottery SystemsReply
I'd like to express thanks to the 23 (out of 31 on May 24, 2011) for taking the time to respond to the Poll positively. Unfortunately, as you have witnessed I'm sure, this topic is not easy to pursue when there is a concerted effort to thwart it by a vocal minority who appear to have some vested interest motivating them. I don't have the time or will to deal with such dissonance at this time. What I hope is that you have enough interest in this area to pursue the links provided in my other th
May 24, 2011, 10:01 am - jimmy4164 - Mathematics Forum

Does Mathematical Innumeracy foster superstitions and support the belief in them?Reply
You've started some lottery/math threads and I've started a few of my pseudo-science threads, along with a few other threads begun recently involving forum-topic-appropriate discussion possibilities, but mostly they haven't taken off like rockets. That's true. Witness the ridiculous responses to my recent attempts to introduce backtesting of lottery systems - not conducive to a successful launch. One would think that those who believe systems can be designed to beat the lottery odds would w
May 24, 2011, 8:51 am - jimmy4164 - Mathematics Forum

Backtesting and Simulating Lottery SystemsReply
Jimmy I thought this post was about Backtesting and Simulating Lottery Systems but I will refrane from posting on your post. RL
May 13, 2011, 12:43 pm - RL-RANDOMLOGIC - Mathematics Forum

Four to Six day rule for Pick -3Reply
backtesting in Georgia: 3/1 thru 4/26 11 misses....48 hits...7 double hits within the 4 to 6 day range.
Apr 27, 2011, 5:59 am - wcminor - Lottery Systems Forum

Backtesting and Simulating Lottery SystemsReply
RL, I'm noticing in F10 you didn't block any numbers and set the 0/1 for 4,5,6,7,8,9,0. Is that just for backtesting or a good setup to play? Looking at these, I see I have a lot to learn about the sidebar filters. Great Job my friend!
Apr 11, 2011, 2:36 pm - garyo1954 - Mathematics Forum

Backtesting and Simulating Lottery SystemsReply
Jimboo-boo!!!!! Thought you resolved this on page 1 when you said, Anyone who would accept the results of a Mone Carlo Simulation didn't need to see it in the first place, and all those who need to see the results, would not accept them! This is no time to get all fuzzy and warm and waffly. Either you don't need to see the results, or you would not accept the results once you see them. The baquette that caused your train wreck came after you made the grandiose proclamation, I was plann
Apr 9, 2011, 11:54 am - garyo1954 - Mathematics Forum