Search

New breakthrough prediction systemReply
Any RNG program would just give you results similiar to a quick pick at a lottery terminal. Trying to find the pattern of randomness is pointless. There is no pattern of randomness . That's why it's called random. Do me a favor. Take a bunch of ping pong balls without numbers. Put them in a large clear jar. Take the jar and watch the balls while you shake it. Then tell me as you are watching the balls how it is possible to predict the order that these balls are bouncing with a computer progra
Sep 16, 2003, 12:31 pm - Thomas Covenant - Lottery Systems Forum

New breakthrough prediction systemReply
What is the cardinal sin with wanting a system that only picks one ticket for a drawing? Quick Pick players do it all the time... so do those who play their own significant personal numbers.win or lose ( I do agree with secret4777's signature phrase 100%), a system that could take a look at info from past drawings (trends, etc...) and throw out it's best guess (which is all systems do anyway) would only set you back the cost of one ticket... not 30...if it was wrong.I think I'm finally getting t
Sep 13, 2003, 11:14 am - hypersoniq - Lottery Systems Forum

Mega Millions Drawing 9/5/03Reply
Quote: Originally posted by Bug on September 09, 2003 I bet if both you guys send your picks to Todd, and he posts them. We will never be able to tell what is a QuickPick and what is from a System. you don't think that i am going to share my jackpot with todd do you?i like todd alot, but no piggy-backing visiondude to the mutha load. thats why i don't give out my numbers pre-drawing.but you are right. to the naked eye (lol), quick pick numbers look the same right alongside system n
Sep 9, 2003, 11:19 pm - visiondude - Jackpot Games Forum

New breakthrough prediction systemReply
Quote: Originally posted by hypersoniq on September 09, 2003 I don't mean to misrepresent myself... I'm as dumb as a stump...( maybeiamfinallybuyingintoacertainVISION...oneshotdoneandletfatetakeoverbutwithalittle help )(1) if you are dumb as a stump and i have zero mathematical skills, then i am at the root of the problem with my one little quick pick (lol). but then again, at the root of every problem lies a giant oak tree. (i dunno. i just make stuff up as i go along)(2) coming ov
Sep 9, 2003, 10:51 pm - visiondude - Lottery Systems Forum

DreamsReply
Dowser my opinion on the Kreskin Method is that instead of using a computer to choose numbers randomly, you are using your mind as a random number generator. I have discover this on my own as a way to choose quick picks. As far as dreams, the mind free spiinning numbers , astrology I say hogwash. Statistical data combined with probability in a systematic way I find to work. Quik picks are needles in haystacks. I know people have won from them playing pick 3, but if tracked win verses loss it is
Aug 20, 2003, 3:11 am - FUJITA - Lottery Discussion Forum

Forming a Trust... any links to info?Reply
It has been done before... seems like the best way to remain anonymous...District of ColumbiaThe winner of the December 11, 1999 Powerball drawing has formed a trust to claim the prize. Although the lottery has checked out the winner as required by law and rules, the $24,463,084.04 lump sum prize is being claimed by a trustee. The Lottery confirmed that the winner is from Maryland, is at least 18 years old, and is not a DC lottery employee. Trustee H. Dean Bouland says his client has not quit hi
Jul 17, 2003, 8:26 am - hypersoniq - Lottery Discussion Forum

Seeing patterns where none existReply
Good I'll quit right now......... I'm ahead. Pay up baby face ! Seriously, you are frustrating but I think it's fascinating that someone of your obvious abilities could have escaped any interest in math or probability. At first I thought you were putting us on. Now, I think its funny. It does bother me that in a Forum full of inexperienced players.......and there are many....that they will waste there chances on quick-picks. I'm talking about pick 3/4 . Hell....I do quick picks on everything el
Jul 12, 2003, 3:17 pm - Prometheus1 - Lottery Discussion Forum

Math and probability help or not ?Reply
Quote: Originally posted by Prometheus1 on July 06, 2003 If, one day you buy a quick pick with 123 on it and someone advises you exchange it because 123 had just come in that order the last 2 days in a row, do it. The odds are the same each day ofcourse and anything is possible, but probability says your chances are almost nill. Chances not odds. Let me see I'm following you P. Because 123 came up the 2 previous draws, chances are, it won't come out the third draw. So therefore, any of
Jul 6, 2003, 3:37 pm - askjeeves - Lottery Discussion Forum

New Lotto Cheatah awesome win performanceReply
Anybody who reads RGL newsgroup frequently sees Cheeta posting the subsequent bashing of his sw by the regular members, who were also the people he was up against in that competition. Seems to me he's trying to get newbies to buy, but the lotto old timers know what a joke it is. It's basically a RNG {random number generator} if you're going to play picks of RNG, you might as well play a quick pick. If you're going to spend $15-20 a game, you should be educating yourself on number selection t
Jun 22, 2003, 12:03 pm - Rebeckah - Lottery Systems Forum

How long do you bet your numbers?
I usually pick fresh numbers for each game. I play 4 games twice a week. Usually Five bucks a game. (PowerBall, Mega Millions, MD Lotto, PA Super Six*) I combine my own picks and quick picks for each game. Sometimes I get lazy and play the same numbers again. Or sometimes I just have a good feeling about the numbers I already have. I always toss the old cards when I have filled out new ones.Often I play the same set of numbers in all four games.I hope you enjoy this poll and it has not already b
Jun 14, 2003, 6:45 pm - Dowser - Jackpot Games Forum