Search

Your first numbers system you playedReply
Great idea!The first system I ever used was called the Quick Pick system. ;-)Seriously though, every system I've ever used has involved both some type of logic, plus some degree of randomness . My theory is that since lottery machines are mechical, there is truly no way to make the drawings perfectly 100% random, yet they are still largely random.My theories have always looked at previous drawings, as few as 10 and as many as 200, and have been based on either hot or cold numbers during that
Oct 23, 2001, 7:04 am - Todd - Lottery Discussion Forum

Does anyone know the culprit?Reply
If there's one thing I've seen that works with the lottery, it's people who have FUN doing it. Those people tend to be the luckiest , in my opinion.The way to have the most fun is to try out some different styles of play, and see which one fits your personality best. Some people latch on to one set of numbers their whole life. Others will try a set of numbers for a time, then switch to a different set of numbers. Some people pick different numbers each time, based on whatever makes them happy.
Aug 31, 2001, 5:40 pm - Todd - Lottery Discussion Forum

TODD/BILLYLOCO-WHATS WRONG WITH THIS PICTURE?Reply
yea..our lotto last night was 03-05-09-19-39-46ummm....One of the great prognosticators and I have noticed it too....is that systems seemed to work better the last week of the month..Many times I can hit 3 days in a row in the last week of the month and then it dies out...I know a lady who buys 10-$1 straight/box quick pick on the cash-3 every mid-day and every evening---Results..she averages hitting 2 straight boxes for $290 and 1-50 cent box for $40 every week...Now there is a strategy that ma
Jun 17, 2001, 12:51 pm - Guest - Lottery Discussion Forum

Great article about 1980 Pennsylvania riggingReply
The Pennsylvania Lottery has offered several oddball lotto games, beginning in the mid-1980s. The current regular game, Super-6 Lotto, has a 6-of-69(!!) matrix, with THREE plays for a dollar; however, for those of us who prefer to pick OUR numbers, two of each three games are AUTOMATICALLY quick-picked ! There has been some talk of a joint Ohio-Pennsylvania lotto game. Let's change Super-6 to a 6-of-67 game, two plays for $1, OPTIONAL quick picks, a $5 prize for matching three numbers, and m
Jun 1, 2001, 5:59 am - Guest - Lottery Discussion Forum

Ohio needs Big Game (or Powerball)Reply
RJOh, you have some good points. The 1:450 or so chance of winning a prize as small as FIVE DOLLARS is ridiculous. (Don't ask me why the new 6/49 Michigan Millions also has this token $5 prize.) One other major fault with the Ohio Lotto game is this Kicker - it's not just Quick Pick-only , but, you MUST play the unrelated Lotto in order to play Kicker. If you want to win $100K in Ohio, you should try Buckeye 5. But, the biggest beef I have with your 6/49 is the different way of computing cas
May 14, 2001, 11:18 am - Guest - Lottery Discussion Forum

payments?Reply
I don't play much New York Lotto because the prize pool is ONLY 40% sales. NY Take Five is a better game, but, you need to be a solo winner to get a six-figure prize. I live in Westchester County, so I often play Powerball, and, occasionally, Connecticut Classic Lotto . As for the Big Game, I prefer going to New Jersey because of the much-improved Pick-6 Lotto (over the bogus number version). It's a nicer drive to Massachusetts, but, MA refuses to offer a cash option in its Megabucks and M
Apr 26, 2001, 8:45 am - Guest - Lottery Discussion Forum

Missouri pick 4: Filters 2024Reply
This irks my nerve. I told my oldest son, don't chase, just play a couple of theories that do work in the pick 4. Now, Missouri been on some head bopping playing lately. Yet, some things stay the same. Thanks to Dr65 She no longer post , she posted to play the 0 to 9 theory one day, and I been stuck on it since, because it works. Not just for Missouri, try it in other states. I haven't checked other states, because, I do not play online, so, I would only look at this theo
Feb 6, 2024, 11:38 pm - MzDuffleBaglady - Pick 4 Forum

Missouri midday missing sums pick 3Reply
It's not the season for their BS. On erthang. I went on their blog, my comment is deleted. I was asking about, the quick picks being gimmicks, because, I know I have a least 100 mfkn quick picks, that read, 658 in some form. I had a memorial service for that set right there. Anyway, they went with a repeat again midday, 512, Where the H** is 314? 689, 828? Their funk stanking real strong, not even Apple cider vinegar can cool this mess down. 720 right out the pick 4, now, 51
May 6, 2017, 6:29 pm - MzDuffleBaglady - Pick 3 Forum

Missouri Pick 4 Quick PicksReply
If I hold a quick pick, I might be the only one to hit it big. What a low payout on my quick pick I got twice. Monday, Jan 23, 2017 Evening 8-6-9-0 Numbers Matched Number of Prizes $$ Won Straight 3 $3,000 Box 39 $125 Front 3 1 $300 Back 3 0 $300 Front 2 10 $30 Mid 2 0 $30 Back 2 0 $30 1-Off One Digit 0 $152 1-Off Two Digits 3 $27 1-Off Three Digits 5 $17 1-Off Four Digits 3 $37 (Based on $.50 Plays) Total Winners:
Jan 29, 2017, 8:33 pm - MzDuffleBaglady - Pick 4 Forum

Pick 3 Missouri back pairReply
O.k. This back pair x97. Yet, I see, Molottery going to play around and let it hit, split, front, side to side, before x97. Now , I did this homework this morning, before I went to work this morning. I did some homework on all odd. I see my favorite vtrac hitting. 534. Got a quick pick: 487, which would normally lead me to my trac. Long story short. The 97x, 79x, 7x9, been running all year. Come to the back end, show some face time. Today, 8:18 amThe overdue x97 pai
Jul 8, 2016, 11:24 pm - MzDuffleBaglady - Pick 3 Forum