- Home
- Premium Memberships
- Lottery Results
- Forums
- Predictions
- Lottery Post Videos
- News
- Search Drawings
- Search Lottery Post
- Lottery Systems
- Lottery Charts
- Lottery Wheels
- Worldwide Jackpots
- Quick Picks
- On This Day in History
- Blogs
- Online Games
- Premium Features
- Contact Us
- Whitelist Lottery Post
- Rules
- Lottery Book Store
- Lottery Post Gift Shop
The time is now 4:48 am
You last visited
June 7, 2026, 2:27 am
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)
Search
Search the Lottery Post forums for the keyword(s) you specify
Pickled Pairs
New System Tryout For Everyone :)
Simple recipe...Shelf life--a couple of weeks at least.
Start with your last draw,preferably Eve.
728
Add together the first pair with lottery math for the first digit.
7+2 = 9
Add +9, +0 and +1 to your second digit.
728
2 + 9 = 1 2+0 = 2 2+1 = 3
Put them all together now--
91
92
93
Do your Backtesting and see how well it works for you. Might work for Pick 4 also...haven't tried it mysel
Dec 16, 2011, 9:42 pm - lottolaughs - Lottery Systems Forum
A different look at Pick 3 and pick 4
I've been backtesting with subtracting totals and projecting pairs for the next draws. From the draws for NM a couple of weeks ago. I make a chart of the # drawn, mirrors and totals. This can be used for pick 3 and pick 4.
# drawn mirror total
842 397 157
686 131 313
386 831 613
411 966 588
344 899 655
255 700 744
I've been subtracing totals to see what falls in the next 2 or 3 draws and I found some positive results. The 3rd and fourth sets of numbers from the to
Aug 16, 2011, 2:50 pm - lakerben - Lottery Systems Forum
A Wheel Question...
The majority of your threads are you posting links to articles mostly from people that lottery players never heard of. From your poll, it looked like several people were interesting in backtesting systems using your simulation, but you failed to deliver. The best you could come up with was a semi structured raffle game and you gave no explanation of the total prize payoff.
It looks like 1.65% of the players made a profit collecting about $5 million out of a total prize pool of $125 million an
Jul 29, 2011, 6:33 pm - Stack47 - Lottery Systems Forum
A Wheel Question...
Stack47,
The issue here is not the journalistic credentials of mathematicians and gaming consultants, it's whether their experience allows them to assert mathematical principals that refute your claims regarding the chances of winning lotteries. Above you said,
With Bluejay it's only necessary to read his lopsided rules to know why the high priced 'get rich quick' systems ignore him and since even the simple playing strategies are for SHORT TERM PLAY, only a fool would give his 200,000 ro
Jul 24, 2011, 3:27 pm - jimmy4164 - Lottery Systems Forum
A Wheel Question...
Stack47,
You are absolutely right about me being off topic in this thread. Against my better judgement I purposely took a swipe at you shortly after you sideswiped me in another thread. When you've finished reading what I have to say here, then click this to see why. I posted a serious reply to Wooddrive; you replied with an insult.
https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/233671/2137774
You are a master of the obfuscation technique of false narrative. You want to childishly argue about what
Jul 21, 2011, 10:03 pm - jimmy4164 - Lottery Systems Forum
North Carolina: 5/1 - 5/31/2011
Not at all, I had thought that since it's such an old strategy, everyone would already know of it. When I first started playing around with the pick3, it was the first system I came across.
If you hit the lotto-logix (BobP's) site, there's an article called Power Trails written about 10 years ago. It gives the full instructions, so pardon my abbreviated instructions.
Take the Sun Mid to Sat Mid Draws (mid-day only) and rank the occurrence of the numbers. I've found that mid draws tend to w
May 26, 2011, 3:44 pm - swngnblues - Pick 3 Forum
Interest In Backtesting and Simulating Lottery Systems
Stack47,
Your description of this old system raises more questions than it answers. If you refer to the code I posted in the Backtesting Thread recently, you will be in a much better position to program a simulation of it than me, since you seem to be familiar with it. Besides, you're asking the wrong questions.
When you make a request like, Show us if this system can't beat chance with 6 hits or can't show a profit by with 11 hits., it's not clear what you're asking for. This system
May 10, 2011, 12:57 am - jimmy4164 - Mathematics Forum
Interest In Backtesting and Simulating Lottery Systems
Since this is a Poll Thread on Interest in Backtesting and Simulation, perhaps it would make sense to start a new thread for this discussion. How about Markov Chains and the Lottery in the Mathematics Forum?
Here is some information to get you started...
Here you can find multiple sources on Markov Chains and their applications:
http://www.mat.ucsb.edu/~g.legrady/academic/courses/04s102/markov.html
Markov Chains
A Markov chain is a sequence of random values whose probabiliti
Apr 29, 2011, 10:08 pm - jimmy4164 - Mathematics Forum
What is a lottery system? What distinguishes a lottery system from guesses, dreams and quick picks?
point us to one example of useful information that actually facillitates a player into............ for-sure-profit-land
I don't recall anyone saying a guaranteed profit distingushes systems from QPs or any of the other methods of play. The odds of charts tell us what payoffs we can expect to get. In 5/39 pick-5 games, players can expect to match 2 number for every $10 they wager so if matching 2 numbers pays a buck, SP and QP players can expect to get a buck back. For the same $10, PB playe
Apr 13, 2011, 9:12 pm - Stack47 - Lottery Discussion Forum
What is a lottery system? What distinguishes a lottery system from guesses, dreams and quick picks?
ok, we will play the game your way for uno momento.
go ahead and jettison everything i pontificated on, just in this thread, and then point us to one example of useful information that actually facillitates a player into............ for-sure-profit-land
no theories. not maybe's. no formulations leading to a someday scenario. no pontifications of feigned certainties
real hard copy examples of someone who actually does. * consistently *
not to be rude, but to be straight up, what's us
Apr 13, 2011, 4:22 pm - visiondude - Lottery Discussion Forum
