Search

Why Do Mathematicians Consider The Lottery RandomReply
I don't know it all, in fact, I've stated that I have a rudementary understanding of Statistics, there are far more knowledgable people on this subject - and I'd trust them more than somebody, even my own, subjective experience. I don't disagree with what you're saying - as my opinions have changed plenty throughout my life's experiences, and not everybody takes 20 extra years to reach a solid conclusion on EVERYTHING, and this is just one of the things I've come to believe through study
Aug 26, 2011, 7:28 pm - Boney526 - Lottery Discussion Forum

Looking at a few things Pick 3.
I am not sure, but the Pick 3 Sums and Roots chart might have been first made by AmuzingP3s And it is posted here: http://www.lotto-logix.com/txthouse/pick3sums.html While looking at this post you might want to have that page open. As you can see there on the full regular pick 3 there are 28 Sums from 0 up to 27 and most of the boxed combinations there are on the Middle sums the sums that have most boxed combinations are 13 and 14. Now let us take a look at some Tx past draws:
Feb 27, 2011, 12:34 am - LANTERN - Lottery Systems Forum

What Does It Take To Win (Mathematically Speaking?)Reply
Maybe the abstract to the study will ring some bells! (If you see something here in the abstract or above in the excerpt that strikes you as even remotely connected to the kinds of thought processes you engage in to design or critique a number selection system, it might be a starting point for a question. I would hope it at least prompts you to click on the link above and READ more of the study.) ABSTRACT Ecologists working in conservation and resource management are discovering the imp
Feb 3, 2011, 2:00 am - jimmy4164 - Mathematics Forum

What Does It Take To Win (Mathematically Speaking?)Reply
RJOh, You said, What discussion? Good question. Since my opening post, all that's been posted here are inane remarks, and that includes yours. The attacks on the 1975 study as out of date don't even confirm that the article was read, since it was merely a reference that was mentioned in the paragraph I included as an excerpt. If you aren't careful, it won't be long before the slowest people here figure out what your real purpose is in these Forums. --Jimmy4164 P.S. No need to bot
Feb 1, 2011, 12:11 am - jimmy4164 - Mathematics Forum

Thank Heaven For Seven System :)Reply
Hi, your lottolaughs study is good, but we don't have to forget that one types of the Previous draw repeats, (almost always) he/she needs to see as the pairs are fit in in this study Because, maintaining the central criterion or the base of an I type repeats of the previous draw We cannot discard this, you ally would be to see criteria in 80% approved, (success tests) For the studies to follow the base, for not giving conflito,ou that this giving good results to Maintain as
Nov 22, 2010, 6:50 pm - dr san - Lottery Systems Forum

Pick 3 Missouri-MayReply
wow, 959 Sometimes, you try so hard to win, and the game is made it look so easy. Evening, 499 5/20/2010 Evening, 959 5/21/2010 The two 99's came back in the game, from evening to evening. I played, 549 because, that's the number my grandson gave me. tis, tis, tis, Study long, study wrong.
May 21, 2010, 8:33 pm - MzDuffleBaglady - Pick 3 Forum

Not enough thoroughbred players around here...Reply
First off, saying that you have knowledge blows your credibility right off the bat. To be honest, not only does it sound like you are not sharing anything, it sounds like you have nothing to share and you're whining about others not sharing anything you deem useful. Why would anyone trust you when you've shared nothing at all. Hitting a number off by one means absolutely nothing at all, they are symbols on ping pong balls, they might as well be squares, circles, triangles and wavy lines not n
Apr 17, 2010, 9:54 am - jwhou - Lottery Discussion Forum

Vtrac search engine on Lottery PostReply
V134 did hit in two states on this day of the 8th. I myself played the V455. in WA using several new methods. Anything longer than two months of history is a waste of time. Dates of past occurrences have no significant correlation for repeats. Everything one needs for vtrac results in a win from LP is available now. As Laverne points out, is up to you to make your own conclusions as you study vtracs. That is about as much as you need to know, the rest is up to you. I will share some pointers
Feb 9, 2010, 1:08 am - Delta Draw - Lottery Discussion Forum

There is No Information on the Net about scratchoffs everything is ball lotteriesReply
Also if there was only a university like this...Want to know what i was thinking? Math majors take math for like 2 hours on monday wednesday and friday for 2 hours the rest of the week they take other courses, but this particular scratchoff mathematician he is only interested in MATHEMATICS he doesnt need to study psychology or history or writing his job is to try and crack scratchoff for the rest of his life he is not going to work in a workplace...And you know something studying math with othe
Nov 26, 2009, 6:52 am - pumpi76 - Instant ("Scratch-Off") Games Forum

New York: 9/1 - 9/30/2009Reply
Congrats ...Poorman That list is 190 numbers ..thee is only 220 numbers in number history The trick I guess is one have to study and do follow-ups..in order to see if your ball is in there base on your list one of those will hit every day...NY FLA and ILL or Cal.......cause most of the numbers are there. Guys.....the hard work is to study and look for a way ........... today ny was 628 .two numbers came back 258.. and so on. Poor man has found his way and it working......so con
Sep 22, 2009, 8:06 pm - AngelEyes - Pick 3 Forum