Search

Ain't no stopping nowReply
When I don't use computer lottery programs, 2 to about 30 to 40 last draws are enough for either straight or boxed predictions.2 to 10 last draws are good enough for boxed predictions.10 to 40 last draws are best for straight order predictions.When using some computer programs for straight order predictions it is best to have from at least 40 last draws to up to no more than 1, 000 to 2, 000 last draws, about 1, 500 are plenty enough.Seeing patterns on lottery numbers is not so hard, it is easy
Oct 21, 2005, 4:20 pm - LANTERN - Pick 3 Forum

Second-largest lottery jackpot in US history wonReply
I never considered buying a house next to water and not realizing three things can happen. It can stay pretty, water can recede and I now own a mud hole, or the water can rise, and I now own a useless houseboat. My outlook is to know the possibilities and prepare for them. In almost every single case in life, when there are three choices, two are not good ones. Burying my head in the sand and igoring reality was never an option. That makes me a realist. Neither a pessimist nor an optimist. Poll
Oct 20, 2005, 2:34 pm - Chewie - Lottery News

Dynamic or flexible system(s).Reply
HypersoniqI have no experience with any jackpot kind of games so I can't say too much about them.From what very little and I mean very little that I have very briefly studied and I mean I just glanced at the past draws very very quickly I have seen some general patterns, but because of the number of combinations on those games I don't think that they are of much use, but I don't know, because I haven't yet tried to get winning numbers for those games.As to the pick 3, I can say without a shadow
Oct 17, 2005, 10:43 pm - LANTERN - Lottery Discussion Forum

Keno System that really worksReply
Al,In your first post you implied you had a finished working systems that had made you rich that you were going to sell. Now you say you just started working on it on paper and looking for some ideas and some e-mail addresses. What kind of scam are you trying to run?RJOhto RJOH:You just proved that you don't even read my postings in full, and you reply based on a rapid scan of my posting , rushing to post your negative ideas about me. If you read my latest posting well, you'd have realized that
Sep 21, 2005, 11:56 am - alNafa - Lottery Systems Forum

Gap?Reply
I agree more with Jag331 than with Jake649, I would not have myself said Extremely usefull , but from what little I have so far studied them, I say that they can be usefull or as usefull as anything else can be for the lottery if used just right.I know enough about range gaps to say that they are one of the big keys to winning.I also know of many different kinds of gaps there are so many different kinds of them, I study them a little at a time on and off, to me, filters are almost legion and ra
Sep 7, 2005, 1:13 pm - LANTERN - Lottery Discussion Forum

Powerball lottery changes go into effect SundayReply
I agree with a lot of what you say. But I don't think there's any evidence to support the statement, They couldn't stand the fact that players were able to pick winning numbers as frequently as they did. The conventional wisdom that the games were won mostly with QPs appears to be more accurate than any conventional wisdom has a right to be. LP members probably have the best informational tools, databases, and lottery information exchange in existence. There's probably nowhere in the world whe
Aug 27, 2005, 9:18 am - Rip Snorter - Lottery News

Best Automatic P3 system in the worldReply
Hey there Lantern. Good to hear from you. I like your filters post. A lucky person can take a Bad system and make money with it. We can't learn anything from thatl. If another Quarters type place comes along and lets us bet just a nickel... we still couldn't study the system itself as far as how often it hits. Sure.... eventually it will always come down to money. ...but Systems that can hit more often than others is what we are after right now. Talking about the quarters plays is really n
Aug 24, 2005, 12:33 pm - WIN D - Lottery Systems Forum

Banking Large WinningsReply
Your post carries a lot of baggage. Maybe I'm reading you wrong, or reading too much into what you're saying.First, is it clearly established as fact that 1) most lotto winners lose there money , and 2) they don't have a clue in what to do ? Somehow this sounds more like the conventional wisdom theater. The same one where most lottery players are poor and under-educated (which, of course, you and I are).Second, was, My suggestion is to go to college and study business before you spend any
Aug 6, 2005, 9:08 pm - Rip Snorter - Lottery Discussion Forum

Thanxs all for tx pick 3 and adiosReply
I think that that is very wise of you, if many more people would quit playing, the pick 3 games would not be as messed-up as they are right now.They do as they want, because way too many people play the lottery.Have you seen the boxed repeats and the pair repeats and also so many doubles coming out one after the other, this is not random as I know random to be, this is TLC being rotten as I know them to be.My study of filter patterns tells me that TLC and also all the other state lotteries are r
Aug 6, 2005, 2:58 pm - LANTERN - Pick 3 Forum

Man let lottery winner go firstReply
One of his pals said, It's typical for Larry to have let a woman go in front of him. Live and learn. Last time I let a woman with a couple of items ahead of me in a grocery line her husband and kids joined her before she got to the register. 16 cases of beer and sundry items necessary for an evening of relaxation. Then she tried to write a check, which took a while, followed by a study of the receipt and a long argument over the price of an item she'd bought..... a call for a gopher to go ba
Aug 1, 2005, 1:06 pm - Rip Snorter - Lottery News