Search

How many non repeating vtrac strings?Reply
Funny you should mention this one, T. I do the same thing, only using Emma to get P4 vtracs.... works pretty well there too. Still backtesting this...... thanks again.
Aug 7, 2006, 9:30 am - calabs - Lottery Discussion Forum

15 Hits / 26 DaysReply
With over 950 views of this thread, there does seem to be a bit of interest.....I'm just wondering if others are having any success with their backtesting and the kind of results they are getting with the LIST......anyone?
Jul 30, 2006, 1:11 pm - Karnac - Pick 3 Forum

Pencil and Paper Jackpot CalculationsReply
I'm not sure just how much value there is in backtesting. While I wouldn't totally dismiss it, I don't think that lottery draws are predictable to the degree that backtesting will prove or disprove the value of any system. While I see the number draw methods of most jackpot games as being random, I think there are certain streaks, trends, and averages that manifest along the way. With a certain measure of luck and some insight into these phenomena, I think that most any system will yield some po
Jul 29, 2006, 4:06 am - ayenowitall - Jackpot Games Forum

Spawn Origins of Pick 3 numbers that produce hits for many systems.Reply
Quote: Originally posted by tntea on June 27, 2006 Quote: Originally posted by Badger on June 27, 2006 Quote: Originally posted by Kola on June 27, 2006 Quote: Originally posted by Badger on June 27, 2006 Quote: Originally posted by tntea on June 27, 2006 Quote: Originally posted by paurths on June 27, 2006 I have not counted them yet, but one can create pretty much every possible combination, give or take a few. The winning number will almost be always there. (almost, because i found some draw
Jun 28, 2006, 12:33 am - Kola - Lottery Systems Forum

No delusion-100% winning methodReply
Backtesting? Oh cps10 that's work. You know what, I believe the way to the pointer is very simple very easy. Divine inspiration will have to deliver. I mean the pointer will have to be all of that a bag of chips, because it will have to prove itself through the pre-test draws conducted by the states.
Jun 4, 2006, 10:52 pm - LAVERNE MALONEY - Lottery Systems Forum

Duke v1.0 Predictions and Method TestingReply
Thanks to sfillipo and everyone who has contributed to an awesome program.May we all reap the profits!I have been backtesting florida and illinois using the last drawn number and the missing digits with little success and wondered if anyone found a pattern.Thanks for the help
Jun 4, 2006, 2:10 pm - lessy - Lottery Systems Forum

Emma Lou v1.0 (Pick 4)Reply
I think it can work very well in all states actually. I am going to work on a progression table for this and start backtesting some states.
May 31, 2006, 8:32 am - cps10 - Lottery Systems Forum

Testing Another Method (FADS)Reply
BA, I will do that. Maybe I am a bit too eager. Will work on it still while testing for another week or more....worked well in backtesting...
May 30, 2006, 8:28 pm - Fibonacci - Pick 3 Forum

The HAT Method 5/25 EveningReply
I guess you cats didn't understand me, it looks as if JD did. That is what I am talking about...there are various ways to inspect on that tool, however, they are pre-set, aren't they? I mean you couldn't just abitrarily choose July 17, 2005 to Dec. 1, 2005, can you? I think if that were the case, then you could do the backtesting that JD wants to do.
May 26, 2006, 12:53 pm - cps10 - Pick 3 Forum

Oklahoma #'s for MayReply
trying for one week is a good idea. do backtesting on whatever criteria you would use to get a week and see how the number fair. like if you wanted to play 5/7 - 5/13 what would you use from the previous week and act like you really played. see how the numbers did. i'm thinking of only playing one set of numbers (if i really like no repeater from the day b4 and singles, then that's what i'll play).
May 20, 2006, 3:45 pm - Best Picks - Pick 3 Forum