Search

+ - revisitedReply
I did an extensive analysis on this and tried to find a consistent combination that worked. I think there are as many combinations of +/- needed as you would need to just pick actual numbers and do away with the +/- thing all togeher. Tracking day by day(in a number of ways) it was always +1/-4/+3, -1/+3/-2, -4/+5/-2 etc, etc....... I tried adding combinations to previous numbers selected in a number of ways. I'd be happy to elaborate all my applications. Despite this, I still search fo
Dec 26, 2008, 12:02 am - DownandDirty - Mathematics Forum

South Carolina: 10/1 - 10/31/2008Reply
Hello everyone, I've been asked how I pick my numbers from this list. I use the previous draw to determine that. For instance, if I believe a digit will return, I will key off that digit anywhere on the list. If I do not think a digit will return, then I will pick from combinations that are close in proximity to the last draws. I do consider root sums and sums, but they are only used as filters. Most of the time the winning number is just there, no matter what I may think. Therefore I try to pr
Nov 1, 2008, 6:43 am - soothsayer - Pick 3 Forum

Pick-5 Number Strategy
After playing the lottery games for the past 8 yrs off and on and winning mostly in the cash-3 straight from 2001-2003 using lottery software,i have finally discovered in my opinion the best way at possibly HITTING a PICK-5 jackpot.Currently after much trial and error i am using a method that selects 22 numbers and generates 5 combos for 3/4 number hits and 15 combos for 4/5 number hits.The 22 number selection strategy is an idea i got from one of Steve Players Systems called the PICK-5 CASHFLEX
Oct 25, 2008, 1:47 pm - Pick-5Player - Lottery Systems Forum

The so silly its stupid systemReply
If there are 1990184 possibilities comprising all numbers in those ranges, representing 21.25% of the 9366819 total possibilities and more than 22% of the winners are in those 1990184 combinations then codmander might have discovered a winning edge. If his prediction statistics improve then I'll will do a frequency analysis on the games I play to see if that might work for me also.
May 20, 2007, 9:01 pm - RJOh - Lottery Systems Forum

Promising system..just boughtReply
I've come to the conclusion that it would be too expensive to play all the number combinations out of the 18 numbers I have come down to(as suggested in the Lottery Techniques/Picking Numbers chapter), even if only 3 numbers(1,2 and 6) will be used as first numbers in the combinations. I will probably end up with 150-300 combinations to play. It's actually worse. I've done some checking. You will need to play over 750 combinations. Even when using the frequency chart in the Lottery Techniqu
Jun 4, 2006, 11:33 am - MillionsWanted - Lottery Systems Forum

Somebody crack the champagneReply
BA Thanks for that...do you think that a skip analysis should be used for these 68 combinations?
Mar 31, 2006, 9:49 am - cps10 - Pick 3 Forum

4 out of 5...SOO CLOSE!!Reply
calabs said: I've found that Gail's balanced wheels give a nice distribution of each of the numbers selected... Depending on where you place the number in the wheel will determine the cominations. That's one thing I like about Gail's wheels. You can put the numbers anywhere in the wheel, so what you think are your strongest numbers, you put in the wheel where that number occurs most frequently. The Lottery Post Wheels work exactly the same way. You get a nice distribution of each of the num
Jan 19, 2006, 12:30 am - MrBobb - Pick 5 Forum

Draw history, does it matter?Reply
There isn't a more important piece of information other than WHEN. The WHEN should be the #1 priority and focus of any lottery system. Straight numerical analysis isn't going to cut it. Look athe recent posts on Pick 3 games. The 2 out of 3 and 3 out of 3 systems require an investment basically greater than the payoff. Numerically, the Lottery Official know they have you beat, and their right. If you want to reduce the amount of numerical combinations, you need to know WHEN numbers are going to
Nov 18, 2005, 8:53 am - JKING - Lottery Discussion Forum

Lotto BusterReply
Most lotteries are WON from quick-picks because most of your average lottery players use quick-picks the players that use systems,software and strategies are the minority therefore there wins won't account for most of the jackpots won.Don't knock LottoBuster just because you haven't won with it it's a VERY good program when used properly.If your using the automatic picks then your wasting your time but if you use the wealth of information obtained from the various analysis charts and f
Aug 28, 2005, 10:05 pm - Pick-4_Master - Lottery Systems Forum

PICK 3 Vtrac Movement ...Somebody HELP!Reply
winsumloosesum,That was an excellent description! Now I have LOTS of questions:After you track the movements, do you then take that info to generate all the combos? For example, if after calculating the historical movement trands, you come up with VTRAC 1-2-1 to play, do you then wheel the numbers 0, 5 - 1, 6 - 0, 5? Do you keep them in their respective positions, or do you create all possible combinations?The reason I ask is that because you were so specific as to positional analysis, it see
Aug 26, 2005, 11:17 am - Todd - Pick 3 Forum