Search

Tennessee 7/1 thru 7/31Reply
Computerized drawings, unlike real drawings that use numbered balls selected from a tumbling drum, do not take place in the real world. They are a computer program, which cannot be seen, heard, or televised. For this reason, lottery players have shunned the technique as untrustworthy and prone to unseen errors. Such was the case with California's Daily Derby game, which uses a computerized drawing system. For many months in 2005 certain combinations of numbers that were bought by playe
Jul 28, 2007, 2:42 pm - Blackapple - Pick 3 Forum

privatizing lotteries and your stateReply
The problem with state lotteries is that the state projects proceeds and spend before they get it. Should be spend after you get it. A lot of the infrastructure in this country is up for sale or has been sold. Politicans are afraid to raise taxes to pay for their use. They may loose votes DUHHHHHH. Also the the states are having difficulty funding these systems with low interest bond sales. No one is buying these bonds like they use too. So if they are sold the private companies will
May 11, 2007, 5:56 pm - JAP69 - Lottery Discussion Forum

The State should get sued: how i feel..Reply
In my opinion, I believe that this viewpoint is the inherit problem associated with lotteries to begin with. Why, because all said and done, Lotteries is just another form of gambling. And with any form of gambling, it is designed to make the House wealthy. Not the players. Sure, you will get a few random big winners . But the House wins every single time. And if you believe anything else, your bubble is going to be busted. State run lotteries exist for the sole reason of generating revenue. An
Mar 5, 2007, 11:51 pm - SirMetro - Lottery Discussion Forum

Match 6 $4,950,000 CASH!Reply
Lay in a course for Pennsylvania!!! The only thing on MATCH 6 that puzzles me is that you can match 10 numbers in a 6 number drawing. That means that either some tickets cannot win that way OR the QP generator deliberately repeats some of the numbers to make sure a match of 10 is possible. The 2nd and 3rd line are not extra plays for 66 cents each as those do not count for the jackpot but only for lower prizes. It is NOT like the old Super 6 game where all 3 lines were separate games. The MAT
Mar 3, 2007, 12:33 am - LckyLary - Jackpot Games Forum

Am I A Dreamer?Reply
Raven62 Actually, no - he's trying to win a Pick 3 on any given one day, which by his own admission hasn't happened yet. More importantly, if he's betting $600 per month on an income of $1432 and has not had a winner, trying to win $15,000 is not his biggest problem. Since he said he has not had a winner let's say he's trying to win $500 (or $600 or whatever the payoff for that particular Pick 3) once, and if he's indeed stuck $600 a month, every month, he could hit and not 'get out'.
Nov 2, 2006, 9:53 am - Coin Toss - Pick 3 Forum

US House votes to kill Internet gamblingReply
Yep, that would be correct. Getting Rid of Republicans would not solve the problem. Yes. there's corruptness on both sides. Systems was built on corruptness and is inherently corrupt. American was in the early years a country based on God's law. America was prosperous and rich. Land of Beauty. Then on the other spectrum you had the cunning and brilliant European scam artist whose name was Rothchild who was determined to get his clutches on this American God loving country. He had suckered o
Jul 17, 2006, 3:54 pm - Jimiam - Lottery News

code breaking and the LOtto...Reply
I've come to learn something over the past few months. Wheeling resembles a process in mathematics, called linear interpolation in a Cartesian Plane in which you try and construct a function/graph connecting [plotting] it to Coordinates points in the plane (assuming the function goes up and down). The coordinates represent the directions that the numbers/wheel must take..now the key is you don't have to connect the coordinates to all the points. In this case the wheel doesn't have to foll
Jun 10, 2006, 4:09 am - pumpi76 - Lottery Discussion Forum

No delusion-100% winning methodReply
Quote: Originally posted by SMB1988 on May 21, 2006 Hello everyone, With respects to KOLA for starting such a promising thread, Paruths, Laverne, Califdude, CPS10, TNTEA and all others who have been impatient with this thread need to remember that if you have been playing this game (Pick 3) that is for as along as many of you have been memebers here you must understand that we will not have the answer in 15 minutes or 15 hours if that matter. What does matter is that we become a cohesiv
May 21, 2006, 10:15 pm - LAVERNE MALONEY - Lottery Systems Forum

Litmus Test: vtracsReply
Wow, Ion used a quote from little old me... that's kind of like an entry level programmer being quoted by Bill Gates. In the big picture tho, my post was me playing devil's advocate because you can't develop systems with blind faith... someone has to ask the tough questions. I went on and developed and shared a v-trac work sheet after that post. I also stayed along with the classes until the mirror states came into play. I can't swallow that concept, but I didn't bash Tea for putting it o
Mar 12, 2006, 11:25 am - hypersoniq - Lottery Systems Forum

What does a Winning formula require?Reply
Hello, Many systems could be considered Winning formulas as most of them can consistently beat the odds.The problem is these systems have not yet beaten the odds to the point where they would be profitable or pratical. Current systems that are publicly available seem to elimiate too many possible comblinations therefore they eliminate the winner,or they generate so may possible combinations its is not profitable or pratical to play them all. One system I have been testing is MDI
Feb 25, 2006, 11:55 am - Butters - Mathematics Forum