Search

North Carolina: 2/1 - 2/28/2011Reply
Technically speaking 821 is not a follower of 775. Here is why: the last pre-drawn number was unknown. NCEL uses hidden data to disrupt everyone's statistical analysis .Because there is an absence of data any form of number crunching with pick 3 software is innacurate. There are no missing digits,missing pairs,missing combinations..etc NCEL knows that a vast majority of serious players use pick 3 software to seek an advantage and by them using pre-draws it puts the odds waaaaay in th
Feb 9, 2011, 12:51 pm - crow - Pick 3 Forum

LOA For Lottery A no no
I don't want to offend LOA faithful practioners, but i'm a remote viewer and number analysis and i can telll you that you willl be waisting your time and energy on this LOA money making scheme.I studied the LOA very deeply and was really dedicated to see changes, well i saw more positive changes doing other things.LOA promoters say that succesful people in the past unconciously used the LOA, so that means that you also have to be unconscious about it in such a way that if you hit the lottery you
Oct 29, 2010, 9:11 pm - basil19 - Mystical Forum

Statistically Speaking - QP's and PP'sReply
VISIONDUDE i was asking you in a common sense fashion, to explain exactly HOW you do it, so that others watching our debate can grasp relateable ideals, instead of just random terminologies used by each individual. (Total misunderstanding I WAS explaining how the method worked I didn't realise you were asking me how I put it too use SPECIFICALY anayway in my method I follow these patterns for Pos 1-2 |( LL,HL,LH,HH ) based on draw history analysis I choose one of these pattern pairs
Jul 17, 2010, 12:35 pm - LotteryTechInc - Lottery Discussion Forum

Windows Lotto Pro softwareReply
I feel like a fan of Lotto pro since it is the only program that I thought was worth spending my money on. I purchased my about 3 years ago. It is a good program for analyzing numbers like Rjoh said. You could do the same exact analysis on your own. The program generates numbers by combinations of hot, cold, due filters. It has some other features for your input for filter and wheeling key numbers. I never relied on their numbers because it was basic. The problems I had were that is I h
Apr 4, 2009, 9:07 pm - Editgap - Lottery Discussion Forum

lottery truths
ok this should spark a little interest, i am a keen lottery player i have studied patterns and developed every chart possible over a period of 5 years with not very good results, by that i mean im not a millionaire yet! after showing someone my research he pointed out something very simple but very important that i have seemed to overlook and is rarely ever mentioned. now we both agreed that certain numbers come up more often than others and there must be a reason for this and he used the term '
Aug 20, 2005, 7:09 am - daveyctvr - Lottery Systems Forum

GAP Analysis experts/expertise needed.
Thanks in advance for any ideas/theories we may come with to help us beat this thing(pick-3).My theory consists of 3 parts.1. GAP Analysis(foundation)2. Filters(need to be able to filter out 200-300 combinations)????3. Randomness(can be our friend if properly applied)Dws g1 g2 g3 g4 g5 g6 g7 g8 g9 g10 g11 g12 g13 g14 g15189 314 886 761 232 604 142 203 146 363 963 036 494 868 966 906875 572 457 928 390 838 999 832 059 659 722 180 554 652 692 687303 985 456 828 366 427 360 587 187 250 618
Jul 7, 2005, 2:22 pm - bowldog - Pick 3 Forum

Working on a new systemReply
I'm using the bell curve with Pick 3 combinations that were drawn from the last nine drawings. Why nine drawings? Because there are just ten numbers and the next drawing is the tenth drawing. I try to keep everything tightly related and consistent.That ninth Pick 3 number will be deducted from each of its numbers respective positions in the bell curve chart after the upcoming drawing occurs. You then add the numbers from the new drawing onto their present positions. A number will move up, one
Dec 21, 2004, 6:14 pm - Texasman - Lottery Systems Forum

Lottery Books For Sale on LPReply
Quote: Originally posted by Todd on November 12, 2004How can you say The Lottery Book is anti-lottery? Here's the description:Ok, maybe not anti-lottery per se, but anti-prediction. The kind of writer who thinks there is nothing what-so-ever you can do to help yourself beyond a tiny bit by leaning a certain way. I've read numerous reviews of this book and Don's quotes and it is clear he is a casino tout not a lottery player.Product Description: The Lottery Book: The Truth Behind the Numbers sh
Nov 12, 2004, 10:24 pm - BobP - Lottery Discussion Forum

Lottery programsReply
Colin F,Dang, I had a reply all worked up and somehow it never posted...Anyway. What I had said, was that a test was run last year during the month of March. Several users posted predictions from the software, along with Random numbers generated by Random.ORG. I myself only participated in the trial for the first week.The results brought out two distinct issues.Random numbers out performed the user designed stacks in that test example.That the user designed stacks was only a small set of poss
Feb 13, 2004, 9:27 am - Andrew - Lottery Systems Forum

Hey Visiondude, my main man.... :)
Hey Visiondude...sorry for being M.I.A. I have been just so busy with work, I only have time to look the lottery over on the weekends and that too if my boss lets me off easy. I have decided that I have 2 options with regard to approching this 'problem' as a sort of side experiment.(1) To go the way of analysis and work on the established Physical theory of Chaos and Randomization, which basically states that nothing is ever random. This would mean a dreadfully LARGE amount of input and work for
Aug 14, 2002, 12:13 pm - savant - Lottery Discussion Forum