Search

Some new results on some old techniques.Reply
Some recent play results real quick. From the 7-17 day draw. (I kinda cheated on this one and bought two sets). Right below this one is the other. Pick 4 this day was 3292. And my cheater set. 7-15 day draw. 370 hit. 7-17 eve was 805. Pick 4 was 9245. These mirrored would be 957. Or 954 to see the 945 from the pick 4. 7-18 eve draw. 568 was the pick 3 and 4956 was the 4 draw. Theres the 4 nd 6 of it. (Yeah, I cheated and bought two sets here to.) Bought two
Jul 22, 2013, 4:57 pm - Greenfox - Mathematics Forum

What's next?Reply
Greenfox Impressive! I'm not sure I understand your charts. I'm going to answer your questions by providing more information on how the 'base string' was generated. However, this is going to take some time that is in short supply at the moment. Please stand-by. Hopefully, I'll have a better reply Sunday. What I can say now is that my workout doesn't involve any mathematics, per se. The digits are 'objects' having no quantitative values. No roots, no sums, no mirrors.
Jul 6, 2013, 12:37 pm - bobby623 - Mathematics Forum

Some new results on some old techniques.Reply
And one more before a nap. I've seen enough little green squares jumping around for a night. July 1, 2013 day draws 5-2-6 and 1-2-4-0 0 and 1 totals gave 5-9 and 1-9. Positive and negative mirrors would be 6 for 9 and 2 for 1 there. Even in the maroonish cells to the left under J thru AC you have 1's, 9's and 5's on this one. And there's a shot of that 9 I was just talking about above in cell AV2 and it's connection with 0. To further explain what I'm talking about with that, which I'm
Jul 6, 2013, 6:01 am - Greenfox - Mathematics Forum

Some basic math formulas applied to pick3/pick4Reply
I understand the idea behind this and if the trend you said later about the k digit being USUALLY 0-4 could be beneficial. However I'm curious if you have tried this theory by moving the mirror so to speak. Technically a mirror is assigned arbitrarily. Perhaps there is a universal idea of what a mirror is and how its constituted, in reality a mirror is just a form of a cypher and moving the digits from one place to another since the numbers still run consecutively. In which case you could move t
May 29, 2013, 6:42 am - AlgorithmGuru - Mathematics Forum

Some new results on some old techniques.Reply
Mirrors are just numbers from 0 - 9 you write it down as such... 0 5 1 6 2 7 3 8 4 9 0 could be a 5 1 could be a 6 2 could be a 7 3 could be a 8 4 could be a 9 and always remember to flip 6's to 9's
Jan 4, 2013, 3:29 am - shoptoudrp - Mathematics Forum

Combinatorics & Modus TollensReply
Ok, I will have to look at it more closely. From what I gather Vtracs is a fancy way of saying mirrors. (Vtracs just means VARIABLE TRACKING ) Out of convenience and preference, I will be focusing on the 7/2 pair. I extricated data for the last 372 draws combined. This is a small sample. When doing pick 3 I prefer a sample size of two years. That is roughly 720 drawings. At twice per day it is only one year of time. In playing my other state I went back to Jan 1 2016. That is 720 drawings x 4 ye
Jul 18, 2020, 5:43 am - JeetKuneDoLotto - Mathematics Forum

Cashman87 the key to winning the lottery (2007)Reply
i would suggest that you eliminate combos using skips... then also try to find the true straight by using hot pairs... and you should use a good drawing since hit chart....if you know how to use one...that is if you know what it is... i tried to make one for lots of wins...but the texas website...doesnot allow for easy analysis... does anybody know how to fix this quickly so i can input the data into excel?? you should also bet one straight heavier than others to make more money..
Apr 10, 2012, 4:19 am - LottoBoner - Mathematics Forum

Can math and logic improve chances of winning a jackpot?Reply
Apparently, many lottery players believe with all their money that basic mathematics has a role in lottery play. Adding, using so-called lottery math, current draw results to past results is really popular here. Computing roots, using mirrors, sums, adding/subtracting 1, and other methods abound. Those who are pushing such ideas swear they are winning big and frequently. For what it's worth, I don't think that kind of math is very useful over the long haul. A recent claim by a
Jul 23, 2013, 6:54 pm - bobby623 - Mathematics Forum