Forest Park, Georgia United States
Member #8,800
November 17, 2004
1,029 Posts
Offline
Thought GA doubles players might find the information below interesting...
I didn't have this GA Doubles Only database set up leading into the week of 7/17, but I can see now that this was the Missing 50 or More picture at that point in time:
Forest Park, Georgia United States
Member #8,800
November 17, 2004
1,029 Posts
Offline
Thanks Toney! Hope it can help someone (including me! lol) grab some of that doubles cash. I've had decent luck with a fair number of wins hitting singles, but rarely have I picked winning doubles. Maybe that'll change soon. Trying to integrate a few doubles plays in.
Here's the full list after Sunday night's 223.
And be sure to check out the long dry spell between the pair 26 doubles hits. A whopping 355 doubles skips without either a boxed 226 or boxed 266!
So..... it could still be quite a while before Georgia sees some order of 558 or 588.
Forest Park, Georgia United States
Member #8,800
November 17, 2004
1,029 Posts
Offline
I've been playing a couple of those doubles last week, and am about to go play tonight. Think I'll pick 588 and one of the sets of 35. Thanks Peach
You're very welcome, catspick, and great luck with your choices! Haven't decided yet what I'll put a little on tonight. Usually wind up waiting til the very last minute to choose ;)
Stone Mountain, GA United States
Member #3,189
January 1, 2004
38,281 Posts
Offline
Peach;
How did you do this?
"Thanks Toney! Hope it can help someone (including me! lol) grab some of that doubles cash. I've had decent luck with a fair number of wins hitting singles, but rarely have I picked winning doubles. Maybe that'll change soon. Trying to integrate a few doubles plays in.
Here's the full list after Sunday night's 223.
And be sure to check out the long dry spell between the pair 26 doubles hits. A whopping 355 doubles skips without either a boxed 226 or boxed 266!
So..... it could still be quite a while before Georgia sees some order of 558 or 588."
Since it was after 5pm, I missed it, but WTG even if by accident.
Forest Park, Georgia United States
Member #8,800
November 17, 2004
1,029 Posts
Offline
LOL Toney, that's funny. Y'kow, I had not noticed that "match" until you just brought it to my attention.
Guess it was simply one of those straaange coincidences you see happen sometimes messin' with all the numbers. Does seem uncanny though, doesn't it? lol
So thank you... but yes it was totally an accident, and actually I'd been kicking myself a little for not boxing 355 and 335 last night. But that was only because catspick had mentioned that she was going to play that pair doubled, not because of what you pointed out.
Really needed a good reason to smile today, and you've provided it. Thanks again Toney!
and Hope your own luck takes a big upturn starting tonight!
Poway CA (San Diego County) United States
Member #3,489
January 25, 2004
14,120 Posts
Offline
Peach, your chart proves my point that I'm making in my signature. Sir Isaac Newton didn't play the lottery, but if he had, I'm sure he would have said, "What is hot tends to stay hot and what is cold tends to stay cold". I also used to try to find what was "past due" and play that, but guess what ...... it stayed past due!
That's just my 2 cents worth. I know a lot of people chase the over due digits or pairs or root sums, etc. But for me, I like to play the winners not the losers.
Before I get a bunch of "flames", please understand that I am NOT condemning anyone. Just pointing out my way of doing it!
Forest Park, Georgia United States
Member #8,800
November 17, 2004
1,029 Posts
Offline
Peach, your chart proves my point that I'm making in my signature. Sir Isaac Newton didn't play the lottery, but if he had, I'm sure he would have said, "What is hot tends to stay hot and what is cold tends to stay cold". I also used to try to find what was "past due" and play that, but guess what ...... it stayed past due!
That's just my 2 cents worth. I know a lot of people chase the over due digits or pairs or root sums, etc. But for me, I like to play the winners not the losers.
Before I get a bunch of "flames", please understand that I am NOT condemning anyone. Just pointing out my way of doing it!
Always appreciate your input, CD. I've learned a lot from you, and I can see a lot of wisdom in what you're saying. You've been studying this game a lot longer than I have.
Today's 131 was a very recent hit, and maybe it would be a good strategy to play for a repeat from the last say, 10 or 15 drawn doubles.
But last night's 355 was after 29 doubles skips for the 35 pair, which was approaching the 34.1 skip average for the 35 pair.
So maybe that would be a valid area to consider selecting from? That is, playing some pairs that were approaching or had recently passed their skip average. I dunno, I'm still learning, and open to any and all suggestions. :)
Here's the same chart, btw, updated and reshuffled this time in order to rank skip average (after today's 131). Then its easy to compare a pair's skip average with its current skips:
(Sorry it looks so terribly scattered as posted this time. Soon I'll learn how to use Todd's stuff for posting tables. This was copied and pasted from my versabet files, as transferred to notepad.)
Later......
Have to try to select what, if anything, I'm going to play tonight. I like the chances of a single showing this Eve. (after two consecutive doubles, tracking Combined)