Welcome Guest
You last visited December 10, 2016, 5:39 am
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)

# Crazy General, yet BASIC Idea

Topic closed. 4 replies. Last post 11 years ago by ayenowitall.

 Page 1 of 1
East of Atlanta
United States
Member #6191
August 11, 2004
1389 Posts
Offline
 Posted: August 5, 2005, 11:47 pm - IP Logged

On Pick 5 & 6 type games, has anyone considered something that is ruther rudimentary and extrodinarily simple?

For example, say a pick 6 game has a matrix of 49 numbers.

Take the last 6 draws (or 10, something worth testing) and then simply subtract 50 from each of the numbers in each draw.

Example:

02-04-10-15-20-30 <----(subtract 50 from each yeilds)--->20-30-35-40-46-48 (remember to reverse the outcome so that it appears correctly)

Now above is part 1

Part 2 gets a bit more complex, but simply put, take the results and average them

02-04-10-15-20-30 <--(less 50)-->20-30-35-40-46-48 <--(average)-->11-17-23-28-33-39

Dump Water Florida
United States
Member #380
June 5, 2002
3104 Posts
Offline
 Posted: August 6, 2005, 2:24 am - IP Logged

On Pick 5 & 6 type games, has anyone considered something that is ruther rudimentary and extrodinarily simple?

For example, say a pick 6 game has a matrix of 49 numbers.

Take the last 6 draws (or 10, something worth testing) and then simply subtract 50 from each of the numbers in each draw.

Example:

02-04-10-15-20-30 <----(subtract 50 from each yeilds)--->20-30-35-40-46-48 (remember to reverse the outcome so that it appears correctly)

Now above is part 1

Part 2 gets a bit more complex, but simply put, take the results and average them

02-04-10-15-20-30 <--(less 50)-->20-30-35-40-46-48 <--(average)-->11-17-23-28-33-39

Add two more steps and sell it to Steve Player.

mid-Ohio
United States
Member #9
March 24, 2001
19831 Posts
Offline
 Posted: August 6, 2005, 1:09 pm - IP Logged

I looked at the last 400 drawings of the Ohio 649 lottery and found that the numbers in the winning combinations had appeared in the previous 35 drawings 22-29 times 50% of the time and that those number had appeared 25-27 times 25% of the time. 50% of the time their sums equaled 120-170 and  25% of the time they were 130-160.  50% of the gaps (different between adjacent numbers after they are sorted) were less than 7 and 75% were less than 11.  The range (the different between the lowest and highest numbers) of these combinations equaled 38-43 twenty-five percent of the time and 32-46 fifty percent of the time.  29 was the most popular number and it had come up with 32,18,22 and 44 the most matching 3 eleven times and matched 4 once.  All the data and more and I've never picked all six winning numbers together in 25 lines.

RJOh

* you don't need to buy more tickets, just buy a winning ticket *

Norway
Member #9517
December 10, 2004
1272 Posts
Online
 Posted: August 6, 2005, 2:04 pm - IP Logged

Have you tested your idea?

United States
Member #4416
April 22, 2004
1075 Posts
Offline
 Posted: August 10, 2005, 3:25 am - IP Logged

SirMetro,

I've been following this thread with the hope that it might develop to a point where I can better understand your method. That hasn't happened yet, so I thought I might just ask a few questions.

• Why do you subtract 50 from each number? Why not 49, 48, 51, or any other number?
• What is the reason for reversing the outcome so it "appears correctly".
• Why do you average the two sets of numbers?
• What is the theory behind this method? Why would these derived numbers presumably be advantageous to play? How would they be more likely to hit than any other number selections?
• Is this simply a method of re-randomizing draw numbers?

I hope you can offer some further explanation about your system. Please understand that I am not knocking your idea. I just don't understand exactly what your idea is.

Thanks,

aye'

 Page 1 of 1