Welcome Guest
Log In | Register )
You last visited December 8, 2016, 3:03 pm
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)

KY: Lotto South v 'Lose for Life'

Topic closed. 4 replies. Last post 11 years ago by Tnplayer805.

Page 1 of 1
PrintE-mailLink

Which is better for Kentucky?

Lotto South [ 5 ]  [55.56%]
Online 'Lose for Life' [ 4 ]  [44.44%]
Total Valid Votes [ 9 ]  
Discarded Votes [ 1 ]  

United States
Member #379
June 5, 2002
11296 Posts
Offline
Posted: October 23, 2005, 8:50 pm - IP Logged

The future of Lotto South is in jeopardy.

    Avatar

    United States
    Member #1826
    July 11, 2003
    2645 Posts
    Offline
    Posted: October 23, 2005, 10:13 pm - IP Logged

    It depends on the game. If the WfL is a really fun game, I'll choose that. Otherwise, LS will get my vote.

    (insert signature here)

      Tnplayer805's avatar - G 14_v78828750_Small.JPG
      North Dakota
      United States
      Member #13397
      April 5, 2005
      1623 Posts
      Offline
      Posted: October 24, 2005, 1:50 am - IP Logged

      I love LS but I think it's a lost cause now. 

      How are you going to win if you don't play?


        United States
        Member #16612
        June 2, 2005
        3493 Posts
        Offline
        Posted: October 24, 2005, 3:05 pm - IP Logged

        KY should stay with Lotto South. Lose for Life isn't probably suitable for KY.

          Tnplayer805's avatar - G 14_v78828750_Small.JPG
          North Dakota
          United States
          Member #13397
          April 5, 2005
          1623 Posts
          Offline
          Posted: October 25, 2005, 12:24 am - IP Logged

          Well that wouldn't be the first time KY made a mistake...  Remember double up cash???

          How are you going to win if you don't play?