United States
Member #1,826
July 11, 2003
2,645 Posts
Offline
I was thinking Lucky For Life's sales were starting to level off, and I will reserve judgement of whether it's starting to drop again until the next draw. Keep in mind that unpopular numbers may have been drawn.
United States
Member #16,611
June 2, 2005
3,493 Posts
Offline
It's strange that two second prize winners for Unlucky for Life occurred. Good for them in PA. When was it the last time there was a first prize Unlucky for Life?
PA United States
Member #22,982
October 6, 2005
2,229 Posts
Offline
Had 3 of 6 as usual. Damn. Rest assured though I will be the next #1 for the jackpot win when there is a winner. QP was pretty good for such bad numbers. Had 6, 25, 29, 35, 36, 38. Soooo close. I can barely take this anymore.
PA United States
Member #22,982
October 6, 2005
2,229 Posts
Offline
I have no idea if PA is happy with sales of this game. Neither do I know if they are looking to replace it.
For some reason I see that you conveniently left out a few other dates.
Thurs, March 2, 2006
Lucky For Life Lotto: 2, 8, 19, 24, 32, 38
0 players matched 6 of 6, each receiving $3,000.00 a month for life
11 players matched 5 of 6, each receiving $2,000.00
Mon, February 27, 2006
Lucky For Life Lotto: 13, 18, 28, 29, 34, 37
0 players matched 6 of 6, each receiving $3,000.00 a month for life
10 players matched 5 of 6, each receiving $2,000.00
Thurs, February 23, 2006
Lucky For Life Lotto: 2, 5, 10, 12, 19, 28
0 players matched 6 of 6, each receiving $3,000.00 a month for life
14 players matched 5 of 6, each receiving $2,000.00
Lucky For Life Lotto: 3, 22, 29, 32, 33, 38
0 players matched 6 of 6, each receiving $3,000.00 a month for life
8 players matched 5 of 6, each receiving $2,000.00
Thurs, February 16, 2006
Lucky For Life Lotto: 4, 8, 12, 24, 28, 29
0 players matched 6 of 6, each receiving $3,000.00 a month for life
18 players matched 5 of 6, each receiving $2,000.00
Nothing like waiting until only 1 or 2 people have won to trash a game eh? Probably made your day, but unfortunately your ONE draw does not paint an accurate depiction. But it is always convenient to only include your side of the story, albeit a very small portion.
United States
Member #379
June 5, 2002
11,296 Posts
Offline
I have no idea if PA is happy with sales of this game. Neither do I know if they are looking to replace it.
For some reason I see that you conveniently left out a few other dates.
Thurs, March 2, 2006
Lucky For Life Lotto: 2, 8, 19, 24, 32, 38
0 players matched 6 of 6, each receiving $3,000.00 a month for life
11 players matched 5 of 6, each receiving $2,000.00
Mon, February 27, 2006
Lucky For Life Lotto: 13, 18, 28, 29, 34, 37
0 players matched 6 of 6, each receiving $3,000.00 a month for life
10 players matched 5 of 6, each receiving $2,000.00
Thurs, February 23, 2006
Lucky For Life Lotto: 2, 5, 10, 12, 19, 28
0 players matched 6 of 6, each receiving $3,000.00 a month for life
14 players matched 5 of 6, each receiving $2,000.00
Lucky For Life Lotto: 3, 22, 29, 32, 33, 38
0 players matched 6 of 6, each receiving $3,000.00 a month for life
8 players matched 5 of 6, each receiving $2,000.00
Thurs, February 16, 2006
Lucky For Life Lotto: 4, 8, 12, 24, 28, 29
0 players matched 6 of 6, each receiving $3,000.00 a month for life
18 players matched 5 of 6, each receiving $2,000.00
Nothing like waiting until only 1 or 2 people have won to trash a game eh? Probably made your day, but unfortunately your ONE draw does not paint an accurate depiction. But it is always convenient to only include your side of the story, albeit a very small portion.
And in those five drawings, how many "won" the booby prize? Add 'em up!
PA United States
Member #22,982
October 6, 2005
2,229 Posts
Offline
"Jackpot games" are not supposed to be won often, hence the lack of winners just as it is supposed to be. If there was a winner every week the game would either be gone quickly, or more numbers added. All those losses are going to fund a new lifetime winner again sooner or later. Hopefully me, and sooner. Also you are the one who brought up "second prize" not me. So I simply added some facts.
United States
Member #379
June 5, 2002
11,296 Posts
Offline
"Jackpot games" are not supposed to be won often, hence the lack of winners just as it is supposed to be. If there was a winner every week the game would either be gone quickly, or more numbers added. All those losses are going to fund a new lifetime winner again sooner or later. Hopefully me, and sooner. Also you are the one who brought up "second prize" not me. So I simply added some facts.
OK, but did PA ever expect a drawing with only ONE second prize?