Welcome Guest
Log In | Register )
You last visited December 4, 2016, 9:15 am
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)

mega millions picks

Topic closed. 4 replies. Last post 11 years ago by Just6ntlc.

Page 1 of 1
PrintE-mailLink
Avatar
New Member
Gate City, Virginia
United States
Member #33898
February 25, 2006
6 Posts
Offline
Posted: February 27, 2006, 2:04 pm - IP Logged

this is what lotto architect picked when i ran it, tell me what you think

 

37+38+46+47+55 (34)-257 (sum)

23+26+42+49+55 (42)-237 (sum)

 

and i heard that the sum is supposed to  mean something not sure yet what it is.

    fja's avatar - gnome1

    United States
    Member #91
    January 19, 2002
    11924 Posts
    Online
    Posted: February 27, 2006, 4:37 pm - IP Logged

    this is what lotto architect picked when i ran it, tell me what you think

     

    37+38+46+47+55 (34)-257 (sum)

    23+26+42+49+55 (42)-237 (sum)

     

    and i heard that the sum is supposed to  mean something not sure yet what it is.

    I think that if anything near those numbers come out, then it wilkl roll over again!

      lottoarchitect's avatar - waveform

      Greece
      Member #2815
      November 18, 2003
      502 Posts
      Offline
      Posted: February 27, 2006, 9:56 pm - IP Logged

      this is what lotto architect picked when i ran it, tell me what you think

       

      37+38+46+47+55 (34)-257 (sum)

      23+26+42+49+55 (42)-237 (sum)

       

      and i heard that the sum is supposed to mean something not sure yet what it is.

      Did you perform the search test described in the help file or you simply clicked "generate" with the default parameters? Before commenting on something, please read the help file to understand what you are doing and how to use it efficiently (also a deep explanation of the algorithms and settings can be found at the forums about the HCD system). And yes, the numbers do mean something to me; you have set a very low test range/hot cutoff/cold cutoff or your data are very few (or restricted by a draw filter). To your knowledge, this is a strategy you can apply in the program but surely you have never heard about it/tried it before Lotto Architect first implemented it. It is different to expect from a program to pick all the 6 correct numbers from a set of 6 numbers (if you know one let me know) and different to know how to use that information presented to you supported with backtesting. Also have a look at the "intelligent filtering" concept and see how you can use these picked numbers along with backtesting. This is the real power of the system, to let you remove combinations smartly, since everyone agrees that it is impossible to have 6 correct numbers when picking 6 by any software. As for the "look and feel" of the numbers, even I don't know the lottery game you play neither the settings and backtesting report generated, I still feel 1-2 of these numbers will come out. Don't be surprised if they do. I have seen such "irregular" patterns in the past that do hit numbers.

       

      lottoarchitect

      If you have something to do, at least do it well...

        lottoarchitect's avatar - waveform

        Greece
        Member #2815
        November 18, 2003
        502 Posts
        Offline
        Posted: March 1, 2006, 10:41 am - IP Logged

        this is what lotto architect picked when i ran it, tell me what you think

         

        37+38+46+47+55 (34)-257 (sum)

        23+26+42+49+55 (42)-237 (sum)

         

        and i heard that the sum is supposed to  mean something not sure yet what it is.

        MM 2,4,35,36,48 Megaball 22 came out.

         

        Quite close don't you think? Now imagine what you could hit if you learn exactly how to use the HCD system with backtesting. 

         

        lottoarchitect

        If you have something to do, at least do it well...


          United States
          Member #16612
          June 2, 2005
          3493 Posts
          Offline
          Posted: March 1, 2006, 1:54 pm - IP Logged

          Your numbers were close, but not enough to win anything. To add insult to injury, Ohio won MM.