Welcome Guest
Log In | Register )
You last visited January 17, 2017, 2:51 am
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)

This isnt suppossed to happen

Topic closed. 11 replies. Last post 11 years ago by BobP.

Page 1 of 1
PrintE-mailLink
Coin Toss's avatar - shape barbed.jpg
Zeta Reticuli Star System
United States
Member #30470
January 17, 2006
10389 Posts
Offline
Posted: March 8, 2006, 11:38 pm - IP Logged

Or so say the "experts"

Illinois Lotto 3-8-06

06-33-41-42-43-44

"Don't ever play four numbers in sequence" or so say those who write lottery books. 

 

    Raven62's avatar - binary
    New Jersey
    United States
    Member #17843
    June 28, 2005
    50995 Posts
    Offline
    Posted: March 8, 2006, 11:58 pm - IP Logged

    What is an "expert" anyway?

    A person who knows more and more about less and less!

      RJOh's avatar - chipmunk
      mid-Ohio
      United States
      Member #9
      March 24, 2001
      19893 Posts
      Offline
      Posted: March 9, 2006, 12:21 am - IP Logged

      Experts say there are a lot fewer combinations with 4-6 sequential numbers than there are combinations without them therefore the winning combinations are less likely to be one of them, they neglect to mention the chances of matching any combination is the same regardless of the numbers in it. 

      They also say never play birthday numbers because winners will likely have to share the jackpot, concluding it's better to win nothing than share a jackpot.  Fact is most jackpots won with low numbers usually have only one winner and many time low numbers drawings have no winners at all.

      There is a lot of such worthless information about lotteries floating around out there.

       * you don't need to buy more tickets, just buy a winning ticket * 
         
                   Evil Looking       

        Avatar

        United States
        Member #21574
        September 11, 2005
        138 Posts
        Offline
        Posted: March 9, 2006, 12:29 am - IP Logged

        RJOh

        you must have just modified your post.

        something about dribble in a book and selling it...

        I say that's where the REAL jackpot is !!!

          four4me's avatar - gate1
          MD
          United States
          Member #1701
          June 18, 2003
          8391 Posts
          Offline
          Posted: March 9, 2006, 12:44 am - IP Logged
          read and weep i think 16 people had this that night.

          Wed, Oct 20, 2004 Maryland Bonus Match 5 ---- 33-34-35-36-37, Bonus: 27

           

            BobP's avatar - bobp avatar.png
            Dump Water Florida
            United States
            Member #380
            June 5, 2002
            3112 Posts
            Offline
            Posted: March 9, 2006, 1:28 am - IP Logged

            Or so say the "experts"

            Illinois Lotto 3-8-06

            06-33-41-42-43-44

            "Don't ever play four numbers in sequence" or so say those who write lottery books. 

             

            Four sequential numbers are drawn roughly 2% of the time, so the advice not to make up tickets with 4 or more consecutive numbers is sound.  It all comes down to how often you want a chance to win vs. how good a chance you want of winning when it comes around.  If you are willing to wait out 50 draws for a chance to play all sets of 4 consecutive numbers plus all the remaining number pairs, that could be an effective jackpot strategy if only 4 consecutive numbers could be counted on to appear once every 50 draws and not just twice in a hundred or four times in two hundred or whatever it takes. 

            I don't believe in playing something that only comes around once every 50 or 100 draws. I'd rather have a chance of winning in every draw. BobP


              Coin Toss's avatar - shape barbed.jpg
              Zeta Reticuli Star System
              United States
              Member #30470
              January 17, 2006
              10389 Posts
              Offline
              Posted: March 9, 2006, 2:32 am - IP Logged

              RJOH

              There's a diference between saying never play birthday numbers and never play all birthday numbers. Theorhetically, if you hit and all the numbers were under 31 there's less chance of that being a solo hit. 

                truecritic's avatar - PirateTreasure
                Michigan
                United States
                Member #22395
                September 24, 2005
                1583 Posts
                Offline
                Posted: March 9, 2006, 5:12 am - IP Logged

                Coin Toss

                One day someone will see these numbers too:

                1 2 3 4 5 6

                LOL

                 

                I think what RJ is saying is this...if you think all birthday numbers are going to come out winning, who cares if the jackpot is shared.  Why pass up the once in your lifetime that you will win it?

                 

                  barbos's avatar - gold bar-and-cash1.jpg
                  California
                  United States
                  Member #23908
                  October 17, 2005
                  122 Posts
                  Offline
                  Posted: March 9, 2006, 6:31 am - IP Logged

                  Just look at  here

                  Here

                  two winners in computerized draw. Isn't it beautiful?

                    Badger's avatar - adu50016 NorthAmericanBadger.jpg
                    Wisconsin
                    United States
                    Member #1303
                    March 27, 2003
                    1508 Posts
                    Offline
                    Posted: March 9, 2006, 7:23 am - IP Logged

                    Or so say the "experts"

                    Illinois Lotto 3-8-06

                    06-33-41-42-43-44

                    "Don't ever play four numbers in sequence" or so say those who write lottery books. 

                     

                    They also say "never bet two numbers ending in the same digit on the same draw". As per your example, it shows again that they don't know what they are talking about.  Even three numbers ending in the same digit will show often enough. Throw out most of what the "experts" who write the books say. I've seen too much proof that they don't have a clue.

                    I guess if they did, they would have won the lottery by now and not have to write books to make their money. LOL

                    ============

                    How can you tell if a politician is lying?

                    Answer: His lips are moving.

                      RJOh's avatar - chipmunk
                      mid-Ohio
                      United States
                      Member #9
                      March 24, 2001
                      19893 Posts
                      Offline
                      Posted: March 9, 2006, 12:25 pm - IP Logged

                      Or so say the "experts"

                      Illinois Lotto 3-8-06

                      06-33-41-42-43-44

                      "Don't ever play four numbers in sequence" or so say those who write lottery books. 

                       

                      Four sequential numbers are drawn roughly 2% of the time, so the advice not to make up tickets with 4 or more consecutive numbers is sound.  It all comes down to how often you want a chance to win vs. how good a chance you want of winning when it comes around.  If you are willing to wait out 50 draws for a chance to play all sets of 4 consecutive numbers plus all the remaining number pairs, that could be an effective jackpot strategy if only 4 consecutive numbers could be counted on to appear once every 50 draws and not just twice in a hundred or four times in two hundred or whatever it takes. 

                      I don't believe in playing something that only comes around once every 50 or 100 draws. I'd rather have a chance of winning in every draw. BobP


                      BobP,

                      The Ohio Buckeye5 game ended in October 2004 after almost an eleven years run.  During its run only 0.6% of the possible combinations were ever drawn so how does avoiding 2% of the possible combinations improves ones chances of winning?  The numbers 01 02 03 04 05 and 06 in a pick6 has never come up all together, but in most cases they have done as well as any other set of numbers that has never won the big prize when you compare small wins.  These are just MegaMillions results.

                      11/15/05  02 04 05 40 48    +07
                      06/20/03  01 02 03 12 37    +35
                      09/20/02  01 02 04 05 46    +08

                       * you don't need to buy more tickets, just buy a winning ticket * 
                         
                                   Evil Looking       

                        BobP's avatar - bobp avatar.png
                        Dump Water Florida
                        United States
                        Member #380
                        June 5, 2002
                        3112 Posts
                        Offline
                        Posted: March 10, 2006, 12:35 am - IP Logged

                        Or so say the "experts"

                        Illinois Lotto 3-8-06

                        06-33-41-42-43-44

                        "Don't ever play four numbers in sequence" or so say those who write lottery books. 

                         

                        Four sequential numbers are drawn roughly 2% of the time, so the advice not to make up tickets with 4 or more consecutive numbers is sound.  It all comes down to how often you want a chance to win vs. how good a chance you want of winning when it comes around.  If you are willing to wait out 50 draws for a chance to play all sets of 4 consecutive numbers plus all the remaining number pairs, that could be an effective jackpot strategy if only 4 consecutive numbers could be counted on to appear once every 50 draws and not just twice in a hundred or four times in two hundred or whatever it takes. 

                        I don't believe in playing something that only comes around once every 50 or 100 draws. I'd rather have a chance of winning in every draw. BobP


                        BobP,

                        The Ohio Buckeye5 game ended in October 2004 after almost an eleven years run.  During its run only 0.6% of the possible combinations were ever drawn so how does avoiding 2% of the possible combinations improves ones chances of winning?  The numbers 01 02 03 04 05 and 06 in a pick6 has never come up all together, but in most cases they have done as well as any other set of numbers that has never won the big prize when you compare small wins.  These are just MegaMillions results.

                        11/15/05  02 04 05 40 48    +07
                        06/20/03  01 02 03 12 37    +35
                        09/20/02  01 02 04 05 46    +08

                        The 2% figure I gave is for the Illinois 6/52 and the reason you want to avoid playing 2% of the combinations is because they may be 100% of your combinations.  Even if you only play 5 lines, one bad line is 20% of your playing power, why waste 20% of your playing budget on a gross line type that comes up one time in roughly 50 draws meaning 49 draws it's impossible for this line to win a jackpot.  There is a big difference between slim and none.

                        "Spock, what are the odds of the away team encountering hostile aliens?"

                        "Captain, I estimate the odds to be 1 in 13,983,816.

                        "Say again, I can't hear you over all the screaming!"

                        Badger: I've never seen an "expert" say not to play a combination where two numbers end in the same last digit, as the odds of that is 50% and the other 50% consists of everything else that can happen with last digits. The odds of no numbers with the same last digit is 20% and the odds of two sets of two with the same last digit (12, 22, 25, 35, 47, 49) is also 20%, talking IL 6/52 game again, other games may vary slightly.  If you can supply a source for the "expert" advice you saw I'd love to see it.  BobP