NO 5+1 prizes in Lose for Life 3/18!!Prev TopicNext Topic

• CASH Only

  United States
  Member #379
  June 5, 2002
  11,296 Posts
  Offline
  Mar 19, 2006, 1:09 pm

  ▲▼

  What an embarrassment! Six drawings and still no booby prize, and now a drawing without a $52,000 winner. The novelty of this game is wearing off quickly.
• Jake649

  

  Canada
  Member #2,673
  November 2, 2003
  497 Posts
  Offline
  Mar 19, 2006, 1:45 pm

  ▲▼

  There are no winners because the game does not exist.

  Good luck,
  Jake
• CASH Only

  United States
  Member #379
  June 5, 2002
  11,296 Posts
  Offline
  Mar 19, 2006, 1:47 pm

  ▲▼
  Quote: Originally posted by Jake649 on March 19, 2006

  There are no winners because the game does not exist.

   Hopefully soon it really won't exist.
• Just6ntlc

  United States
  Member #16,611
  June 2, 2005
  3,493 Posts
  Offline
  Mar 19, 2006, 9:56 pm

  ▲▼

  Is Lose For Life computerized or ball drawn? I hope nobody wins the booby prize anytime soon.
• atl1

  

  atlanta
  United States
  Member #33,558
  February 22, 2006
  65 Posts
  Offline
  Mar 19, 2006, 10:12 pm

  ▲▼

  ball drawn
• dvdiva

  

  United States
  Member #2,338
  September 17, 2003
  2,063 Posts
  Offline
  Mar 20, 2006, 1:05 pm

  ▲▼

  I think the lucky for life game in WA state died from low sales for two reasons. People finally realized that 52k pre-tax isn't a lot for a lottery prize. The game is really not worth it to older players or those worried about their health.
  
• Just6ntlc

  United States
  Member #16,611
  June 2, 2005
  3,493 Posts
  Offline
  Mar 20, 2006, 1:36 pm

  ▲▼

  I agree dvdiva. When people win lots of money, they get taxed by Uncle Sam. It's not worth it.
  
• CASH Only

  United States
  Member #379
  June 5, 2002
  11,296 Posts
  Offline
  Mar 20, 2006, 2:24 pm

  ▲▼
  Quote: Originally posted by dvdiva on March 20, 2006

  I think the lucky for life game in WA state died from low sales for two reasons. People finally realized that 52k pre-tax isn't a lot for a lottery prize. The game is really not worth it to older players or those worried about their health.
  

  The WA Unlucky for Life online game, which did not have a cash option, was replaced last year by the Lucky for Life scratch, which gives winners a CHOICE of $1000-a-week or $750,000 lump sum. The lack of a cash option obviously hurt the online version, something OR and other states need to learn.
• Korean Redneck

  United States
  Member #23,805
  October 16, 2005
  188 Posts
  Offline
  Mar 22, 2006, 3:40 pm

  ▲▼

  what a stupid game.  They should of sticked with Lotto South.
• CASH Only

  United States
  Member #379
  June 5, 2002
  11,296 Posts
  Offline
  Mar 24, 2006, 4:16 pm

  ▲▼
  Quote: Originally posted by Korean Redneck on March 22, 2006

  what a stupid game.  They should of sticked with Lotto South.

  Everybody can agree on that.

  Seven drawings and still no booby prize!
• lchoro

  United States
  Member #5,565
  July 11, 2004
  260 Posts
  Offline
  Mar 26, 2006, 9:51 am

  ▲▼

  Somebody won last night.  It looks like they're selling about 1.2 to 1.5 million dollars worth per last night's drawing, probably much less in the middle of the week.
  
• CASH Only

  United States
  Member #379
  June 5, 2002
  11,296 Posts
  Offline
  Mar 26, 2006, 1:17 pm

  ▲▼
  Quote: Originally posted by lchoro on March 26, 2006

  Somebody won last night.  It looks like they're selling about 1.2 to 1.5 million dollars worth per last night's drawing, probably much less in the middle of the week.
  

  I was hoping there would NEVER be a 6/6 ticket in this game. But that was a nice streak of seven drawings without a booby prize.
• sirbrad

  

  PA
  United States
  Member #22,982
  October 6, 2005
  2,229 Posts
  Offline
  Mar 26, 2006, 2:51 pm

  ▲▼

  Yeah we all know that jackpots games are won ALL the time.
  
  *sarcasm* Glad to see a winner, why no post announcing it cash?
• CASH Only

  United States
  Member #379
  June 5, 2002
  11,296 Posts
  Offline
  Apr 6, 2006, 11:44 am

  ▲▼

  Wednesday, April 5: No booby prize or second place tickets. You can ask GA, KY, and/or VA about this game, but they won't admit it's terrible.
• Just6ntlc

  United States
  Member #16,611
  June 2, 2005
  3,493 Posts
  Offline
  Apr 6, 2006, 2:22 pm

  ▲▼

  I think they should have kept Lotto South. This game is terrible and not interesting to people CASH Only. I hope there are no more 1st prize booby prizes in the future. I rather see people win 5 numbers or less.