Welcome Guest
Log In | Register )
You last visited December 4, 2016, 1:02 am
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)

Pcnut gave me a doubles Idea

Topic closed. 78 replies. Last post 11 years ago by cps10.

Page 4 of 6
PrintE-mailLink
tntea's avatar - Lottery-059.jpg

United States
Member #5344
June 30, 2004
23641 Posts
Offline
Posted: April 24, 2006, 7:46 pm - IP Logged

Thanks Pac. It worked in Maryland mid-day 188. Last evenings number was 081.

Tried it and caught it for $80.00.  Had a $66.50 profit.

litebets

I use the combos with 0 in it as a double warning.. If I dont play all possible 88 11.. I at least put the two together and play 188 118...

Caught a box too.. $75..  worth 50cent after the warning..  sometimes it is a few days later

     OLD/Vtrac   Lottery Bible         Double Warnings      Thumbs Up TN F34/F44

    tntea's avatar - Lottery-059.jpg

    United States
    Member #5344
    June 30, 2004
    23641 Posts
    Offline
    Posted: April 24, 2006, 7:48 pm - IP Logged

    A narrow down would be seeing the doubles that show up in the OLD string after a draw..

     

         OLD/Vtrac   Lottery Bible         Double Warnings      Thumbs Up TN F34/F44


      United States
      Member #17555
      June 22, 2005
      5582 Posts
      Offline
      Posted: April 24, 2006, 7:56 pm - IP Logged

      Hey Pac,

      Nice finding you got there!

       

      I just did a backtest on Florida as well, a few differences;

      Out of the 365 days, 106 were days with a double being drawn the day before, thus lowering the cost...

      Total cost: 106 x 54 + 259 x 81 = 5724 + 20979 = 26703

      I only found a total of 36 winning days though...

      Total winnings: 36 x 900 = 32400

      Profit: 32400 - 26703 = 5697

      Weekly profit: 5697 / 52 = 109.56

       

      Backtesting entire history (1573 draws) produced the following result:

      Total cost: 1144 x 81 + 429 x 54 = 115830

      Total winnings: 140 x 900 = 126000

      Profit: 126000 - 115830 = 10170

      Weekly profit: 10170 / (1573 / 7) = 45.26

       

      I ran these through an Excel sheet, so the numbers should be correct, how did you get yours?

      I'll try to test some more states tonight...

      Good luck with your system, and thanks for sharing!

      When you back tested the entire history, did you also take in account the reduction cost in the doubles?

      I don't even know how to use Exxxon, I mean Excel...

      I did it manually, starting a year back and working my way to the present. It didn't take as long as I thought it would. But I seriously have to learn all that excel stuff and the sorts. It would make life alot easier..LOL

      Thanx.


        United States
        Member #17555
        June 22, 2005
        5582 Posts
        Offline
        Posted: April 24, 2006, 8:00 pm - IP Logged

        WOW pacattack05, I guess I got those doubles wheels grinding. So far, what I have put into motion is having a bad start, but the night is not over yet. I do like your concept and I'm going to look into it a little further. I will be following this thread as you go along and I may throw a bone in there now and then.

        Good luckI Agree!

        pcnut

         

        I'm embarrased for not thanking you for this. If it wasn't for your post, I would not even be thinking about the doubles.

        Still needs some tweaking, but not much.


          United States
          Member #17555
          June 22, 2005
          5582 Posts
          Offline
          Posted: April 24, 2006, 8:03 pm - IP Logged

          A narrow down would be seeing the doubles that show up in the OLD string after a draw..

           

          At what percent is that selection process successful?

          Sounds like if people put their heads together here, we can have many profitable days to come....

          Thanx tntea....

            Avatar
            New Member

            Denmark
            Member #38171
            April 24, 2006
            7 Posts
            Offline
            Posted: April 24, 2006, 8:04 pm - IP Logged

            Hey Pac,

            Nice finding you got there!

             

            I just did a backtest on Florida as well, a few differences;

            Out of the 365 days, 106 were days with a double being drawn the day before, thus lowering the cost...

            Total cost: 106 x 54 + 259 x 81 = 5724 + 20979 = 26703

            I only found a total of 36 winning days though...

            Total winnings: 36 x 900 = 32400

            Profit: 32400 - 26703 = 5697

            Weekly profit: 5697 / 52 = 109.56

             

            Backtesting entire history (1573 draws) produced the following result:

            Total cost: 1144 x 81 + 429 x 54 = 115830

            Total winnings: 140 x 900 = 126000

            Profit: 126000 - 115830 = 10170

            Weekly profit: 10170 / (1573 / 7) = 45.26

             

            I ran these through an Excel sheet, so the numbers should be correct, how did you get yours?

            I'll try to test some more states tonight...

            Good luck with your system, and thanks for sharing!

            When you back tested the entire history, did you also take in account the reduction cost in the doubles?

            I don't even know how to use Exxxon, I mean Excel...

            I did it manually, starting a year back and working my way to the present. It didn't ake as long as I thought it would. But I seriously have to learn all that excel stuff and the sorts. It would make life alot easier..LOL

            Thanx.

            Yup...

            Non mihi, non tibi, sed nobis

            - Sodalis de Apollon

              tntea's avatar - Lottery-059.jpg

              United States
              Member #5344
              June 30, 2004
              23641 Posts
              Offline
              Posted: April 24, 2006, 8:12 pm - IP Logged

              A narrow down would be seeing the doubles that show up in the OLD string after a draw..

               

              At what percent is that selection process successful?

              Sounds like if people put their heads together here, we can have many profitable days to come....

              Thanx tntea....

              let's try it out..

              Will start a test post

                   OLD/Vtrac   Lottery Bible         Double Warnings      Thumbs Up TN F34/F44


                United States
                Member #17555
                June 22, 2005
                5582 Posts
                Offline
                Posted: April 24, 2006, 8:13 pm - IP Logged

                Hey Pac,

                Nice finding you got there!

                 

                I just did a backtest on Florida as well, a few differences;

                Out of the 365 days, 106 were days with a double being drawn the day before, thus lowering the cost...

                Total cost: 106 x 54 + 259 x 81 = 5724 + 20979 = 26703

                I only found a total of 36 winning days though...

                Total winnings: 36 x 900 = 32400

                Profit: 32400 - 26703 = 5697

                Weekly profit: 5697 / 52 = 109.56

                 

                Backtesting entire history (1573 draws) produced the following result:

                Total cost: 1144 x 81 + 429 x 54 = 115830

                Total winnings: 140 x 900 = 126000

                Profit: 126000 - 115830 = 10170

                Weekly profit: 10170 / (1573 / 7) = 45.26

                 

                I ran these through an Excel sheet, so the numbers should be correct, how did you get yours?

                I'll try to test some more states tonight...

                Good luck with your system, and thanks for sharing!

                When you back tested the entire history, did you also take in account the reduction cost in the doubles?

                I don't even know how to use Exxxon, I mean Excel...

                I did it manually, starting a year back and working my way to the present. It didn't ake as long as I thought it would. But I seriously have to learn all that excel stuff and the sorts. It would make life alot easier..LOL

                Thanx.

                Yup...

                Thanx, I just saw it in your workout, sorry. I've had 4 Heinekens now.....LOL

                It's still a positive cash flow. And that's what really counts anyway, right?


                  United States
                  Member #17555
                  June 22, 2005
                  5582 Posts
                  Offline
                  Posted: April 24, 2006, 8:23 pm - IP Logged

                  A narrow down would be seeing the doubles that show up in the OLD string after a draw..

                   

                  At what percent is that selection process successful?

                  Sounds like if people put their heads together here, we can have many profitable days to come....

                  Thanx tntea....

                  let's try it out..

                  Will start a test post

                  I would like to lessen the days being played with your selection process and test it to see if it is profitable. The scientific method is the only way to determine what works and what doesen't. I need all the help I can get....LOL

                  We need a think tank on this one....

                    Thoth's avatar - binary
                    Findlay, Ohio
                    United States
                    Member #4855
                    May 28, 2004
                    400 Posts
                    Offline
                    Posted: April 24, 2006, 8:24 pm - IP Logged

                    Pac - It would have hit 6 times in the last 90 games in Ohio

                    ~Probability=Odds in Motion~

                      Thoth's avatar - binary
                      Findlay, Ohio
                      United States
                      Member #4855
                      May 28, 2004
                      400 Posts
                      Offline
                      Posted: April 24, 2006, 8:30 pm - IP Logged

                      The chance for the event to occur is 8.1% (from a no-match to a double) or 5.4% for a double to a double. 

                      ~Probability=Odds in Motion~


                        United States
                        Member #17555
                        June 22, 2005
                        5582 Posts
                        Offline
                        Posted: April 24, 2006, 8:35 pm - IP Logged

                        Pac - It would have hit 6 times in the last 90 games in Ohio

                        That is exactly the reason why I wanted to do a long term study.


                          United States
                          Member #17555
                          June 22, 2005
                          5582 Posts
                          Offline
                          Posted: April 24, 2006, 8:39 pm - IP Logged

                          Oh well, I guess I'll ring my hands and throw in the towel.....NOT...LOL

                          This one might be a bust, but I can gaurantee that I will never stop learning from the lessons I impose on myself.

                          Failure is not an option.

                            Thoth's avatar - binary
                            Findlay, Ohio
                            United States
                            Member #4855
                            May 28, 2004
                            400 Posts
                            Offline
                            Posted: April 24, 2006, 9:17 pm - IP Logged

                            Florida is probably clustering with hits right now (as all rondom things tend to cluster off and on) ...it will most likely stretch back out to an unprofitable system if you played it every draw.  Most likely it will only hit an overall percent of the time according to its probability percentage.  Lol I always run into things like that - things that work great for a short time then stop. Bash

                            ~Probability=Odds in Motion~


                              United States
                              Member #17555
                              June 22, 2005
                              5582 Posts
                              Offline
                              Posted: April 24, 2006, 9:21 pm - IP Logged

                              Florida is probably clustering with hits right now (as all rondom things tend to cluster off and on) ...it will most likely stretch back out to an unprofitable system if you played it every draw.  Most likely it will only hit an overall percent of the time according to its probability percentage.  Lol I always run into things like that - things that work great for a short time then stop. Bash

                              I know exactly what you mean. It's just a short term trend. And that ruins my day....LOL

                              But the numbers have been in the green and not in the red yet.

                              So, there is some hope based on the positive cash flow here. Don't ya think?