In response to the NC/SC joint game.Prev TopicNext Topic

• JimmySand9

  

  United States
  Member #1,826
  July 11, 2003
  2,645 Posts
  Offline
  Jun 14, 2006, 8:17 pm

  ▲▼

  What do you think? I'll create some sample prize structures for the most popular matrix or matrices.
  

  (insert signature here)
• LOTTOMIKE

  

  Tennessee
  United States
  Member #7,853
  October 15, 2004
  11,352 Posts
  Offline
  Jun 15, 2006, 8:51 pm

  ▲▼

  6/42 would be nice.....

  
• Tnplayer805

  

  North Dakota
  United States
  Member #13,397
  April 5, 2005
  1,623 Posts
  Offline
  Jun 16, 2006, 12:47 am

  ▲▼

  I like the 6/49.  I think that would be right size for a <$30 million game

  How are you going to win if you don't play?
• Just6ntlc

  United States
  Member #16,611
  June 2, 2005
  3,493 Posts
  Offline
  Jun 16, 2006, 2:22 am

  ▲▼

  I think the right size will be 6/52 (my vote) JimmySand9. When Lotto South launched in GA, KY, and VA, their matrix was 6/49. I rather think that NC/SC should have 6/52.
• CASH Only

  United States
  Member #379
  June 5, 2002
  11,296 Posts
  Offline
  Jun 16, 2006, 9:38 am

  ▲▼
  Quote: Originally posted by Just6ntlc on June 16, 2006

  I think the right size will be 6/52 (my vote) JimmySand9. When Lotto South launched in GA, KY, and VA, their matrix was 6/49. I rather think that NC/SC should have 6/52.

  The 6/49 matrix in LS was too small, which had something to do with the game being replaced. I voted for 6/53.
• Tnplayer805

  

  North Dakota
  United States
  Member #13,397
  April 5, 2005
  1,623 Posts
  Offline
  Jun 16, 2006, 12:26 pm

  ▲▼

  I think if Lotto South would have had a lower matrix they would have stayed around longer.  True the JP's wouldn't have been high but if there had been more $2-5 Million winners, more people would have tried since it is easier to become a millionaire by playing that game rather than MM or PB. 

  How are you going to win if you don't play?
• LOTTOMIKE

  

  Tennessee
  United States
  Member #7,853
  October 15, 2004
  11,352 Posts
  Offline
  Jun 16, 2006, 1:00 pm

  ▲▼

  some of these games could be brought back and some could very well do good if they are given the proper promotion and chance to grow.....

  
• LOTTOMIKE

  

  Tennessee
  United States
  Member #7,853
  October 15, 2004
  11,352 Posts
  Offline
  Jun 16, 2006, 1:01 pm

  ▲▼

  i'd love a low matrix 6 number game where you could win a couple million.

  
• Tnplayer805

  

  North Dakota
  United States
  Member #13,397
  April 5, 2005
  1,623 Posts
  Offline
  Jun 16, 2006, 8:11 pm

  ▲▼

  The game would do well if you hear in the news...  Another $2 million winner last night.  If you heard that on everyother newscast more people would stop and think...  HMM...  Someone is always winning that game.  Why not give it a try.  Of course when PB or MM goes over $100 million forget it.  lol.  But it would be something to shoot for while those games are building up to that mark.  Just a thought...

  How are you going to win if you don't play?
• CASH Only

  United States
  Member #379
  June 5, 2002
  11,296 Posts
  Offline
  Jun 19, 2006, 3:28 pm

  ▲▼
  Quote: Originally posted by Tnplayer805 on June 16, 2006

  I think if Lotto South would have had a lower matrix they would have stayed around longer.  True the JP's wouldn't have been high but if there had been more $2-5 Million winners, more people would have tried since it is easier to become a millionaire by playing that game rather than MM or PB. 

  LS was too low at 6/49. LS had the same matrix as Lotto VA, one of the three games it replaced.