There is a mathematical order to everything in existence……math is involved in the makeup of the very material you are wearing. Math is involved in taking man to the moon…..and math is also an integral part of the principle of Chaos.
The random behavior of numbers drawn in an honest lottery should fall under the principle of chaos. Chaos is simplly the unpredictability of a set of events for one specific moment in time. When that “moment” in time is repeated several times a week, left undisturbed by the interference of external forces, there will be a mathematical predictability over a series of those “moments” to lead one to accurately predict what will occur in the next few series of “moments”. When external actors purposefully interfere, that is when you start having frequent repetitive appearances of a singular aspect within that chaotic behavior(ie particular number or numbers repeating more frequently than naturally done under the principle of chaos)
A couple months ago when someone here, I don’t remember who, suggested that it was impossible for one player to dictate the behavior of the lottery because it is an honest game, I set about devising a system that would allow a player to wager a limited amount of funds over a series of draw that should be able to predict a set of numbers appearing within that time frame of 2 months…..and thus demonstrate that the game is not as honest as it seems. Actually, I was hoping I was wrong and that my system would provide me with a winning draw. So for the last 2 months I have been walking around with a chip on my shoulder, confident that if the lottery was honest….I would be retiring soon……and if it was not, then all I would end up doing would be to bring a chaotic behavior to MM.
During this experiment of my system which is all based upon the arrangement of numbers and its adaptation to what was recently drawn….on each occasion that I wagered a group of 55 numbers there has been a MM winner the last 6 times. What that is telling me is that my arrangement is backing the MM game in a corner to select a winner……and it is not going to be profitable if you have a winning number and 60 other people with 2nd place prizes, or for there to be no winner and on a consistent basis have 20 or more people winning 2nd place prize.
The above maybe all mumbojumbo of a spoilt brat who may not be getting his retirement soon but within the last two months those several times I got 4 of 5’s or the multiple appearance of 3 of 5’s for single drawing tells me….. that using modest funds a “true random drawing” can be beaten over time.
I am just waiting to see what this inside Whistle blower is going to be saying to the media in October…..if it will be anything close to my assumptions.
Whoaaaa…..I am now sooo tempted to take my system on a tour of Powerball…..but it’s a bit harder for me to get to DC.
If I do…I’ll let you know so that you can know when outside chaos is brought to the high flying PB.